Assessing Image Inpainting via Re-Inpainting Self-Consistency Evaluation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new approach for evaluating the quality of image inpainting models, called "Re-Inpainting Self-Consistency Evaluation" (RISCE).
- Image inpainting is the task of filling in missing or corrupted regions in an image, which is important for applications like image restoration and editing.
- The authors argue that existing evaluation metrics do not fully capture the quality of inpainted regions, and they introduce RISCE as a more comprehensive assessment method.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about a new way to evaluate how well image inpainting models can fill in missing or damaged parts of an image. Image inpainting is an important task in computer vision and image processing, used for things like restoring old photos or editing images.
The key idea behind the new evaluation method, called RISCE, is to take the inpainted image and try to inpaint it again. If the model is truly consistent, the second inpainting should match the first. By measuring this consistency, RISCE can give a more complete picture of the inpainting quality compared to existing metrics. This is important because some inpainting models may produce plausible-looking results that are actually inconsistent and could be problematic for real-world applications.
The authors argue that RISCE provides a more rigorous and reliable way to assess how well inpainting models are performing, which can help drive progress in this important field of research.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new evaluation metric called "Re-Inpainting Self-Consistency Evaluation" (RISCE) for assessing the quality of image inpainting models. The key idea is to take an image with a missing region, inpaint it, and then try to inpaint the resulting image again. If the model is truly consistent, the second inpainting should match the first.
Specifically, the RISCE process involves:
- Corrupting an input image by removing a region.
- Using the inpainting model to fill in the missing region.
- Corrupting the inpainted image by removing the same region.
- Inpainting the corrupted inpainted image using the same model.
- Measuring the consistency between the first and second inpainted regions.
The authors propose several consistency metrics to quantify this, including pixel-wise differences, perceptual similarity, and semantic consistency. They evaluate RISCE on several state-of-the-art inpainting models and show that it provides a more comprehensive assessment of inpainting quality compared to traditional metrics like PSNR and SSIM.
The experiments demonstrate that RISCE can identify inconsistencies in inpainting results that other metrics miss, highlighting the importance of evaluating not just the final inpainted image, but also the model's ability to maintain coherence and plausibility across multiple rounds of inpainting.
Critical Analysis
The authors make a compelling case for the limitations of existing inpainting evaluation metrics and the need for a more rigorous approach like RISCE. By focusing on the consistency of the inpainting process, rather than just the final output, RISCE provides a more holistic assessment of inpainting quality.
That said, the paper does not address some potential concerns with RISCE. For example, the consistency metrics used (e.g., pixel-wise differences) may be sensitive to minor variations that don't significantly impact the overall quality of the inpainting. Exploring alternative consistency measures, potentially drawing insights from video inpainting, could be an area for future research.
Additionally, the paper tests RISCE on a limited set of inpainting models and datasets. [Evaluating the approach on a wider range of models and real-world applications, such as anti-forensic image inpainting, would help further validate its utility and generalizability.
Overall, the RISCE approach represents a promising step forward in inpainting evaluation, but there may be opportunities to refine and expand the technique to make it even more robust and applicable to a wider range of inpainting use cases.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new evaluation method called "Re-Inpainting Self-Consistency Evaluation" (RISCE) for assessing the quality of image inpainting models. RISCE goes beyond traditional metrics by focusing on the consistency of the inpainting process, rather than just the final inpainted output.
By repeatedly inpainting the same region and measuring the consistency of the results, RISCE can identify inconsistencies that other evaluation methods miss. This is important because some inpainting models may produce plausible-looking results that are actually incoherent or unstable, which could be problematic for real-world applications.
The experiments in the paper demonstrate the value of the RISCE approach and suggest it could be a useful tool for driving progress in the field of image inpainting. While there are opportunities to further refine and expand the technique, RISCE represents a significant advance in the way we evaluate the performance of inpainting models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Assessing Image Inpainting via Re-Inpainting Self-Consistency Evaluation
Tianyi Chen, Jianfu Zhang, Yan Hong, Yiyi Zhang, Liqing Zhang
Image inpainting, the task of reconstructing missing segments in corrupted images using available data, faces challenges in ensuring consistency and fidelity, especially under information-scarce conditions. Traditional evaluation methods, heavily dependent on the existence of unmasked reference images, inherently favor certain inpainting outcomes, introducing biases. Addressing this issue, we introduce an innovative evaluation paradigm that utilizes a self-supervised metric based on multiple re-inpainting passes. This approach, diverging from conventional reliance on direct comparisons in pixel or feature space with original images, emphasizes the principle of self-consistency to enable the exploration of various viable inpainting solutions, effectively reducing biases. Our extensive experiments across numerous benchmarks validate the alignment of our evaluation method with human judgment.
Read more5/28/2024
📶
0
Semantically Consistent Video Inpainting with Conditional Diffusion Models
Dylan Green, William Harvey, Saeid Naderiparizi, Matthew Niedoba, Yunpeng Liu, Xiaoxuan Liang, Jonathan Lavington, Ke Zhang, Vasileios Lioutas, Setareh Dabiri, Adam Scibior, Berend Zwartsenberg, Frank Wood
Current state-of-the-art methods for video inpainting typically rely on optical flow or attention-based approaches to inpaint masked regions by propagating visual information across frames. While such approaches have led to significant progress on standard benchmarks, they struggle with tasks that require the synthesis of novel content that is not present in other frames. In this paper we reframe video inpainting as a conditional generative modeling problem and present a framework for solving such problems with conditional video diffusion models. We highlight the advantages of using a generative approach for this task, showing that our method is capable of generating diverse, high-quality inpaintings and synthesizing new content that is spatially, temporally, and semantically consistent with the provided context.
Read more5/2/2024
0
SafePaint: Anti-forensic Image Inpainting with Domain Adaptation
Dunyun Chen, Xin Liao, Xiaoshuai Wu, Shiwei Chen
Existing image inpainting methods have achieved remarkable accomplishments in generating visually appealing results, often accompanied by a trend toward creating more intricate structural textures. However, while these models excel at creating more realistic image content, they often leave noticeable traces of tampering, posing a significant threat to security. In this work, we take the anti-forensic capabilities into consideration, firstly proposing an end-to-end training framework for anti-forensic image inpainting named SafePaint. Specifically, we innovatively formulated image inpainting as two major tasks: semantically plausible content completion and region-wise optimization. The former is similar to current inpainting methods that aim to restore the missing regions of corrupted images. The latter, through domain adaptation, endeavors to reconcile the discrepancies between the inpainted region and the unaltered area to achieve anti-forensic goals. Through comprehensive theoretical analysis, we validate the effectiveness of domain adaptation for anti-forensic performance. Furthermore, we meticulously crafted a region-wise separated attention (RWSA) module, which not only aligns with our objective of anti-forensics but also enhances the performance of the model. Extensive qualitative and quantitative evaluations show our approach achieves comparable results to existing image inpainting methods while offering anti-forensic capabilities not available in other methods.
Read more8/7/2024
0
RefFusion: Reference Adapted Diffusion Models for 3D Scene Inpainting
Ashkan Mirzaei, Riccardo De Lutio, Seung Wook Kim, David Acuna, Jonathan Kelly, Sanja Fidler, Igor Gilitschenski, Zan Gojcic
Neural reconstruction approaches are rapidly emerging as the preferred representation for 3D scenes, but their limited editability is still posing a challenge. In this work, we propose an approach for 3D scene inpainting -- the task of coherently replacing parts of the reconstructed scene with desired content. Scene inpainting is an inherently ill-posed task as there exist many solutions that plausibly replace the missing content. A good inpainting method should therefore not only enable high-quality synthesis but also a high degree of control. Based on this observation, we focus on enabling explicit control over the inpainted content and leverage a reference image as an efficient means to achieve this goal. Specifically, we introduce RefFusion, a novel 3D inpainting method based on a multi-scale personalization of an image inpainting diffusion model to the given reference view. The personalization effectively adapts the prior distribution to the target scene, resulting in a lower variance of score distillation objective and hence significantly sharper details. Our framework achieves state-of-the-art results for object removal while maintaining high controllability. We further demonstrate the generality of our formulation on other downstream tasks such as object insertion, scene outpainting, and sparse view reconstruction.
Read more4/17/2024