At the edge of a generative cultural precipice
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explores the cultural and ethical implications of generative AI models in the context of artistic creation and intellectual property
- Examines the challenges and opportunities presented by these emerging technologies
- Emphasizes the need for transparent, collaborative, and ethically-grounded approaches to the development and deployment of generative AI
Plain English Explanation
This paper delves into the complex and rapidly evolving landscape of generative AI models and their impact on the world of art and culture. As these powerful technologies become increasingly accessible, they are challenging long-held assumptions about artistic creation, ownership, and the boundaries of intellectual property.
The paper highlights the need for a nuanced, multifaceted approach that considers the perspectives of artists, industry stakeholders, and regulatory authorities. It underscores the importance of fostering transparency, open dialogue, and collaborative efforts to ensure that the benefits of generative AI are realized while mitigating the potential risks and ethical concerns.
Key areas of focus include the opportunities and risks of generative AI in the industry, the ethical questions surrounding the use of AI-generated art, and the potential impact on the rights and livelihoods of artists. The paper also explores the curse of recursion – the complex feedback loop that can arise when generative models are trained on their own outputs.
Throughout the discussion, the authors emphasize the need to foreground the opinions and concerns of artists and to develop a more nuanced understanding of the evolving relationship between human creativity and machine-generated art.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a multifaceted exploration of the cultural and ethical implications of generative AI models in the context of artistic creation and intellectual property. The authors conduct a comprehensive literature review and synthesis of key themes, drawing on relevant research from fields such as computer science, media studies, and law.
The data collection process involves a detailed examination of existing scholarly publications, industry reports, and regulatory frameworks related to the intersection of generative AI and the creative arts. The authors also incorporate insights from a survey of artists, exploring their perspectives on issues of transparency, ownership, and the potential impact of these technologies on their work and livelihoods.
The discussion section delves into the complex and often competing considerations surrounding the use of generative AI in artistic production. The authors highlight the opportunities for democratizing creativity and expanding artistic expression, while also addressing the ethical concerns around the potential for labor exploitation and the infringement of artists' intellectual property rights.
The paper also examines the curse of recursion – the feedback loop that can arise when generative models are trained on their own outputs, potentially leading to the perpetuation of biases and the erosion of artistic authenticity.
Throughout the technical explanation, the authors emphasize the need for transparent, collaborative, and ethically-grounded approaches to the development and deployment of generative AI in the creative arts.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and nuanced analysis of the complex issues surrounding the use of generative AI in the creative arts. The authors have done an admirable job of synthesizing a diverse range of perspectives and considerations, highlighting the challenges and opportunities that these technologies present.
One potential limitation of the research is the reliance on a relatively small sample of artist respondents in the survey component. While the qualitative insights gained from this approach are valuable, a broader and more representative sample could have strengthened the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the potential long-term societal implications of the widespread adoption of generative AI in the arts, such as the impact on traditional educational and training models for creative professionals, or the potential shifts in the perceived value and authenticity of human-created art.
That said, the authors have raised important questions and considerations that deserve ongoing attention and further research. As the field of generative AI continues to evolve rapidly, it will be crucial for artists, industry stakeholders, and regulatory authorities to collaborate and develop ethical frameworks that can effectively navigate the complex interplay of creativity, technology, and intellectual property.
Conclusion
This paper serves as a valuable contribution to the ongoing dialogue surrounding the cultural and ethical implications of generative AI in the creative arts. By highlighting the opportunities and risks presented by these emerging technologies, the authors have laid the groundwork for a more nuanced and collaborative approach to their development and deployment.
The paper's emphasis on the need for transparent, ethically-grounded strategies, as well as its foregrounding of artists' perspectives, underscores the importance of empowering creative professionals and ensuring that the benefits of generative AI are realized in a manner that respects and supports human artistic expression.
As the curse of recursion and other complex challenges continue to emerge, this paper serves as a valuable resource for scholars, policymakers, and industry leaders as they navigate the evolving landscape of generative AI and its impact on the cultural landscape.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
At the edge of a generative cultural precipice
Diego Porres, Alex Gomez-Villa
Since NFTs and large generative models (such as DALLE2 and Stable Diffusion) have been publicly available, artists have seen their jobs threatened and stolen. While artists depend on sharing their art on online platforms such as Deviantart, Pixiv, and Artstation, many slowed down sharing their work or downright removed their past work therein, especially if these platforms fail to provide certain guarantees regarding the copyright of their uploaded work. Text-to-image (T2I) generative models are trained using human-produced content to better guide the style and themes they can produce. Still, if the trend continues where data found online is generated by a machine instead of a human, this will have vast repercussions in culture. Inspired by recent work in generative models, we wish to tell a cautionary tale and ask what will happen to the visual arts if generative models continue on the path to be (eventually) trained solely on generated content.
Read more6/14/2024
0
Rethinking Artistic Copyright Infringements in the Era of Text-to-Image Generative Models
Mazda Moayeri, Samyadeep Basu, Sriram Balasubramanian, Priyatham Kattakinda, Atoosa Chengini, Robert Brauneis, Soheil Feizi
Recent text-to-image generative models such as Stable Diffusion are extremely adept at mimicking and generating copyrighted content, raising concerns amongst artists that their unique styles may be improperly copied. Understanding how generative models copy artistic style is more complex than duplicating a single image, as style is comprised by a set of elements (or signature) that frequently co-occurs across a body of work, where each individual work may vary significantly. In our paper, we first reformulate the problem of artistic copyright infringement to a classification problem over image sets, instead of probing image-wise similarities. We then introduce ArtSavant, a practical (i.e., efficient and easy to understand) tool to (i) determine the unique style of an artist by comparing it to a reference dataset of works from 372 artists curated from WikiArt, and (ii) recognize if the identified style reappears in generated images. We leverage two complementary methods to perform artistic style classification over image sets, includingTagMatch, which is a novel inherently interpretable and attributable method, making it more suitable for broader use by non-technical stake holders (artists, lawyers, judges, etc). Leveraging ArtSavant, we then perform a large-scale empirical study to provide quantitative insight on the prevalence of artistic style copying across 3 popular text-to-image generative models. Namely, amongst a dataset of prolific artists (including many famous ones), only 20% of them appear to have their styles be at a risk of copying via simple prompting of today's popular text-to-image generative models.
Read more4/15/2024
🛸
0
The Cultivated Practices of Text-to-Image Generation
Jonas Oppenlaender
Humankind is entering a novel creative era in which anybody can synthesize digital information using generative artificial intelligence (AI). Text-to-image generation, in particular, has become vastly popular and millions of practitioners produce AI-generated images and AI art online. This chapter first gives an overview of the key developments that enabled a healthy co-creative online ecosystem around text-to-image generation to rapidly emerge, followed by a high-level description of key elements in this ecosystem. A particular focus is placed on prompt engineering, a creative practice that has been embraced by the AI art community. It is then argued that the emerging co-creative ecosystem constitutes an intelligent system on its own - a system that both supports human creativity, but also potentially entraps future generations and limits future development efforts in AI. The chapter discusses the potential risks and dangers of cultivating this co-creative ecosystem, such as the bias inherent in today's training data, potential quality degradation in future image generation systems due to synthetic data becoming common place, and the potential long-term effects of text-to-image generation on people's imagination, ambitions, and development.
Read more9/4/2024
📊
0
U Can't Gen This? A Survey of Intellectual Property Protection Methods for Data in Generative AI
Tanja v{S}arv{c}evi'c (SBA Research), Alicja Karlowicz (SBA Research), Rudolf Mayer (SBA Research), Ricardo Baeza-Yates (EAI, Northeastern University), Andreas Rauber (TU Wien)
Large Generative AI (GAI) models have the unparalleled ability to generate text, images, audio, and other forms of media that are increasingly indistinguishable from human-generated content. As these models often train on publicly available data, including copyrighted materials, art and other creative works, they inadvertently risk violating copyright and misappropriation of intellectual property (IP). Due to the rapid development of generative AI technology and pressing ethical considerations from stakeholders, protective mechanisms and techniques are emerging at a high pace but lack systematisation. In this paper, we study the concerns regarding the intellectual property rights of training data and specifically focus on the properties of generative models that enable misuse leading to potential IP violations. Then we propose a taxonomy that leads to a systematic review of technical solutions for safeguarding the data from intellectual property violations in GAI.
Read more6/26/2024