Attention Mechanisms Don't Learn Additive Models: Rethinking Feature Importance for Transformers

Overview

• The paper tackles the challenge of applying feature attribution methods to the transformer architecture, which is widely used in natural language processing and beyond.
• Traditional attribution methods rely on linear or additive surrogate models, but the paper formally proves that transformers are structurally incompatible with these models, undermining the foundations of these explanation methodologies.
• To address this issue, the authors introduce the Softmax-Linked Additive Log-Odds Model (SLALOM), a novel surrogate model designed specifically to align with the transformer framework.
• SLALOM is shown to provide faithful and insightful explanations across synthetic and real-world datasets, outperforming common surrogate explanations on various tasks.
• The paper highlights the need for task-specific feature attributions rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.

Plain English Explanation

Transformers are a type of deep learning model that have become very popular in natural language processing and other areas. These models are good at understanding the relationships between words and generating human-like text. However, it's often difficult to understand how these models make their decisions and which parts of the input are most important.

Traditional methods for explaining model decisions, like feature attribution, rely on simplified, linear models that approximate the behavior of the original, more complex model. But the authors of this paper show that transformers are fundamentally different from these linear models, so the traditional explanation methods don't work well.

To address this problem, the researchers developed a new type of surrogate model called SLALOM that is specifically designed to work with transformers. SLALOM can provide more accurate and insightful explanations of how transformers make their decisions, especially on real-world tasks. The paper suggests that instead of a one-size-fits-all approach, we need explanation methods that are tailored to the specific model and task at hand.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on the challenge of applying feature attribution methods to the transformer architecture, which has become dominant in natural language processing and other domains. Traditional attribution methods, such as SHAP and LIME, rely on linear or additive surrogate models to quantify the impact of input features on a model's output.

However, the authors formally prove that transformers are structurally incapable of aligning with these popular surrogate models. This fundamental incompatibility undermines the grounding of conventional explanation methodologies when applied to transformers.

To address this discrepancy, the researchers introduce the Softmax-Linked Additive Log-Odds Model (SLALOM), a novel surrogate model specifically designed to align with the transformer framework. Unlike existing methods, SLALOM demonstrates the capacity to deliver a range of faithful and insightful explanations across both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Through extensive experiments, the authors show that diverse explanations computed from SLALOM outperform common surrogate explanations on different tasks. This highlights the need for task-specific feature attributions rather than a one-size-fits-all approach, as different explanation methods may be better suited for different applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a strong theoretical and empirical case for the shortcomings of traditional feature attribution methods when applied to transformer models. The formal proof of the fundamental incompatibility between transformers and linear/additive surrogate models is a significant contribution, as it challenges the foundations of many existing XAI techniques.

However, the paper does not address the potential limitations or edge cases of the proposed SLALOM model. While SLALOM is shown to outperform common surrogate explanations, it would be valuable to understand its performance boundaries, sensitivity to hyperparameters, and any potential biases or artifacts introduced by the model.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the explanations produced by the models, but does not delve into how these explanations might be interpreted and used by human users. Further research is needed to understand the cognitive and practical implications of the different explanation methods, and how they can be effectively integrated into real-world applications.

Lastly, the paper's scope is limited to transformers, but the insights and lessons learned may be applicable to other complex, non-linear models beyond natural language processing. Exploring the generalizability of the findings to other domains could broaden the impact and significance of this work.

Conclusion

This paper tackles a critical challenge in the field of explainable AI: providing faithful and insightful explanations for the increasingly popular transformer architecture. By formally proving the fundamental incompatibility between transformers and traditional surrogate models, the authors highlight the need for a more targeted approach to feature attribution.

The introduction of SLALOM, a novel surrogate model designed specifically for transformers, represents a significant step forward in addressing this challenge. The empirical results demonstrate SLALOM's ability to generate diverse and informative explanations that outperform common methods, underscoring the importance of task-specific explanation strategies.

As transformer models continue to dominate a wide range of applications, this research provides valuable insights and a promising direction for developing more effective and trustworthy explanation techniques. By bridging the gap between the mathematical structure of transformers and the capabilities of feature attribution methods, this work paves the way for more transparent and accountable AI systems.