Audio Transformers:Transformer Architectures For Large Scale Audio Understanding. Adieu Convolutions

Read original: arXiv:2105.00335 - Published 9/19/2024 by Prateek Verma, Jonathan Berger
Total Score

0

👨‍🏫

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Over the past two decades, convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures have produced compelling models of sound perception and cognition, learning hierarchical organizations of features.
  • Analogous to successes in computer vision, audio feature classification can be optimized for a particular task of interest, over a wide variety of datasets and labels.
  • Similar architectures designed for image understanding have proven effective for acoustic scene analysis.
  • This paper proposes applying Transformer-based architectures without convolutional layers to raw audio signals.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores the use of Transformer architectures for audio classification, rather than the more commonly used convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNNs have been successful in modeling sound perception and learning hierarchical audio features, similar to how they have been effective in computer vision.

The researchers hypothesized that Transformer architectures, which have shown promising results in natural language processing and computer vision, could also be applied effectively to raw audio signals for classification tasks.

The paper demonstrates that on a standard dataset of 200 audio categories (Free Sound 50K), the proposed Transformer-based model outperforms CNN-based models, achieving state-of-the-art results. This is significant because, unlike in other domains, the researchers did not perform any unsupervised pre-training to outperform the convolutional architectures.

The paper also explores techniques to further improve the performance of Transformer architectures for audio understanding, such as using pooling inspired by convolutional networks and incorporating multi-rate signal processing ideas from wavelet theory.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a Transformer-based architecture for audio classification that outperforms CNN-based models on the Free Sound 50K dataset, which contains 200 audio categories.

Unlike traditional approaches that rely on convolutional layers to extract audio features, the proposed model uses Transformer layers directly on the raw audio signals. The researchers hypothesized that Transformer architectures, which have shown success in natural language processing and computer vision, could also be effective for audio understanding tasks.

The results demonstrate that the Transformer-based model outperforms CNN-based models in terms of mean average precision, without any unsupervised pre-training, which is typically used to boost the performance of convolutional architectures in other domains.

The paper also explores techniques to further improve the Transformer-based model's performance, such as:

  • Incorporating pooling inspired by convolutional networks
  • Applying multi-rate signal processing ideas from wavelet theory to the Transformer embeddings

The authors show that these techniques can lead to additional improvements in the model's performance on the audio classification task.

Furthermore, the paper analyzes the learned representations of the Transformer-based model, revealing that it learns a non-linear, non-constant bandwidth filterbank. This suggests that the model is able to adaptively learn a time-frequency front-end representation that is well-suited for the task of audio understanding, in contrast to other tasks like pitch estimation.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to audio classification by leveraging Transformer architectures, which have shown success in other domains but have not been extensively explored for audio understanding tasks.

One potential limitation of the research is that it is evaluated on a single dataset (Free Sound 50K) and may not generalize as well to other audio datasets or real-world scenarios. Further testing on a wider variety of datasets would help validate the model's performance and robustness.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the model's interpretability or the learned representations beyond the observation of the non-linear, non-constant bandwidth filterbank. A deeper exploration of the model's internal workings and the insights it can provide into audio perception and cognition would further strengthen the paper's contributions.

It would also be interesting to see how the proposed Transformer-based approach compares to other recent advancements in audio classification, such as the use of diverse neural audio embeddings or lightweight single-stream architectures for efficient audio processing.

Overall, the paper presents a novel and promising direction for audio classification by leveraging Transformer architectures, and the findings could have significant implications for the field of audio understanding.

Conclusion

This paper explores the use of Transformer-based architectures for audio classification, a departure from the more commonly used convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The results demonstrate that the proposed Transformer-based model outperforms CNN-based models on a standard audio classification dataset (Free Sound 50K) without any unsupervised pre-training, which is typically required to boost the performance of convolutional architectures in other domains.

The paper also introduces techniques to further improve the Transformer-based model's performance, such as incorporating pooling inspired by convolutional networks and applying multi-rate signal processing ideas from wavelet theory. Additionally, the analysis of the learned representations reveals that the model adaptively learns a time-frequency front-end that is well-suited for audio understanding tasks.

The findings of this research could have significant implications for the field of audio perception and cognition, as well as practical applications in areas like acoustic scene analysis and audio classification. The approach of leveraging Transformer architectures for audio understanding tasks opens up new avenues for exploration and could lead to further advancements in this domain.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👨‍🏫

Total Score

0

New!Audio Transformers:Transformer Architectures For Large Scale Audio Understanding. Adieu Convolutions

Prateek Verma, Jonathan Berger

Over the past two decades, CNN architectures have produced compelling models of sound perception and cognition, learning hierarchical organizations of features. Analogous to successes in computer vision, audio feature classification can be optimized for a particular task of interest, over a wide variety of datasets and labels. In fact similar architectures designed for image understanding have proven effective for acoustic scene analysis. Here we propose applying Transformer based architectures without convolutional layers to raw audio signals. On a standard dataset of Free Sound 50K,comprising of 200 categories, our model outperforms convolutional models to produce state of the art results. This is significant as unlike in natural language processing and computer vision, we do not perform unsupervised pre-training for outperforming convolutional architectures. On the same training set, with respect mean aver-age precision benchmarks, we show a significant improvement. We further improve the performance of Transformer architectures by using techniques such as pooling inspired from convolutional net-work designed in the past few years. In addition, we also show how multi-rate signal processing ideas inspired from wavelets, can be applied to the Transformer embeddings to improve the results. We also show how our models learns a non-linear non constant band-width filter-bank, which shows an adaptable time frequency front end representation for the task of audio understanding, different from other tasks e.g. pitch estimation.

Read more

9/19/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Tuning In: Analysis of Audio Classifier Performance in Clinical Settings with Limited Data

Hamza Mahdi, Eptehal Nashnoush, Rami Saab, Arjun Balachandar, Rishit Dagli, Lucas X. Perri, Houman Khosravani

This study assesses deep learning models for audio classification in a clinical setting with the constraint of small datasets reflecting real-world prospective data collection. We analyze CNNs, including DenseNet and ConvNeXt, alongside transformer models like ViT, SWIN, and AST, and compare them against pre-trained audio models such as YAMNet and VGGish. Our method highlights the benefits of pre-training on large datasets before fine-tuning on specific clinical data. We prospectively collected two first-of-their-kind patient audio datasets from stroke patients. We investigated various preprocessing techniques, finding that RGB and grayscale spectrogram transformations affect model performance differently based on the priors they learn from pre-training. Our findings indicate CNNs can match or exceed transformer models in small dataset contexts, with DenseNet-Contrastive and AST models showing notable performance. This study highlights the significance of incremental marginal gains through model selection, pre-training, and preprocessing in sound classification; this offers valuable insights for clinical diagnostics that rely on audio classification.

Read more

4/9/2024

AudioRepInceptionNeXt: A lightweight single-stream architecture for efficient audio recognition
Total Score

0

AudioRepInceptionNeXt: A lightweight single-stream architecture for efficient audio recognition

Kin Wai Lau, Yasar Abbas Ur Rehman, Lai-Man Po

Recent research has successfully adapted vision-based convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures for audio recognition tasks using Mel-Spectrograms. However, these CNNs have high computational costs and memory requirements, limiting their deployment on low-end edge devices. Motivated by the success of efficient vision models like InceptionNeXt and ConvNeXt, we propose AudioRepInceptionNeXt, a single-stream architecture. Its basic building block breaks down the parallel multi-branch depth-wise convolutions with descending scales of k x k kernels into a cascade of two multi-branch depth-wise convolutions. The first multi-branch consists of parallel multi-scale 1 x k depth-wise convolutional layers followed by a similar multi-branch employing parallel multi-scale k x 1 depth-wise convolutional layers. This reduces computational and memory footprint while separating time and frequency processing of Mel-Spectrograms. The large kernels capture global frequencies and long activities, while small kernels get local frequencies and short activities. We also reparameterize the multi-branch design during inference to further boost speed without losing accuracy. Experiments show that AudioRepInceptionNeXt reduces parameters and computations by 50%+ and improves inference speed 1.28x over state-of-the-art CNNs like the Slow-Fast while maintaining comparable accuracy. It also learns robustly across a variety of audio recognition tasks. Codes are available at https://github.com/StevenLauHKHK/AudioRepInceptionNeXt.

Read more

4/23/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

A Survey of Deep Learning Audio Generation Methods

Matej Bov{z}i'c, Marko Horvat

This article presents a review of typical techniques used in three distinct aspects of deep learning model development for audio generation. In the first part of the article, we provide an explanation of audio representations, beginning with the fundamental audio waveform. We then progress to the frequency domain, with an emphasis on the attributes of human hearing, and finally introduce a relatively recent development. The main part of the article focuses on explaining basic and extended deep learning architecture variants, along with their practical applications in the field of audio generation. The following architectures are addressed: 1) Autoencoders 2) Generative adversarial networks 3) Normalizing flows 4) Transformer networks 5) Diffusion models. Lastly, we will examine four distinct evaluation metrics that are commonly employed in audio generation. This article aims to offer novice readers and beginners in the field a comprehensive understanding of the current state of the art in audio generation methods as well as relevant studies that can be explored for future research.

Read more

6/4/2024