Augmenting the Author: Exploring the Potential of AI Collaboration in Academic Writing

Overview

• This workshop paper examines the use of Generative AI (Gen AI) as a collaborative tool in the academic writing process.
• It compares the performance and interaction of two AI models, Gemini and ChatGPT, through a collaborative inquiry approach where researchers design prompts to elicit specific AI responses for crafting research outlines.
• The case study highlights the importance of prompt design, output analysis, and recognizing the AI's limitations to ensure responsible and effective AI integration in scholarly work.

Plain English Explanation

This paper looks at how researchers can use Generative AI (Gen AI) models like Gemini and ChatGPT as tools to help with academic writing. The researchers had people work with these AI models and create different prompts or instructions to see what kinds of responses the models would give. This helped the researchers understand the strengths and weaknesses of each model and how to best use them when writing research papers or other academic work.

The key findings are that the way you ask the AI model questions (the "prompt design") has a big impact on the quality of the responses. The researchers also found that each model has its own unique capabilities and limitations. By understanding these, researchers can use the AI models more effectively and responsibly when writing academic papers or conducting research.

Technical Explanation

The paper describes a case study where researchers used a collaborative inquiry approach to explore the integration of Generative AI (Gen AI) models into the academic writing process. Specifically, they compared the performance and interaction of two AI models, Gemini and ChatGPT, by having researchers design prompts to elicit specific responses for crafting research outlines.

The experiment involved facilitated sessions where researchers worked together to create prompts that would produce certain types of AI-generated content. The researchers then analyzed the output of the two models to understand their respective capabilities and constraints. The findings suggest that prompt variation significantly affects output quality, revealing distinct abilities and limitations of each model.

The paper contributes to the field of Human-Computer Interaction by exploring effective prompt strategies and providing a comparative analysis of Gen AI models. This aims to enhance AI-assisted academic writing and promote deeper dialogue within the HCI community about the responsible integration of these technologies.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable case study on the use of Generative AI models in academic writing, but it also acknowledges some of the limitations and areas for further research. For example, the study focuses on a relatively small set of prompts and AI models, so the findings may not be fully generalizable to all Gen AI tools or writing scenarios.

Additionally, the paper notes that the researchers' prompt design and output analysis could be influenced by their own biases and perspectives. There may be a need for more diverse and inclusive teams to conduct this type of research to ensure a range of viewpoints are represented.

Further research could also explore the collective use and evaluation of Generative AI tools in academic settings, as well as the evolving impact of these technologies on learning and assessment. Additionally, studies on writers' attitudes toward co-creativity with AI could provide valuable insights.

Conclusion

This workshop paper presents a thoughtful exploration of using Generative AI models as collaborative tools in the academic writing process. The case study highlights the importance of prompt design, output analysis, and recognizing the strengths and limitations of AI models to ensure their responsible and effective integration in scholarly work.

The findings contribute to the ongoing dialogue within the HCI community about how these technologies can be leveraged to enhance academic writing and research, while also raising important considerations about bias, inclusivity, and the evolving impact of Generative AI on learning and assessment. As AI-assisted writing becomes more prevalent, this type of critical examination will be crucial for guiding the ethical and effective use of these powerful tools.