The Evolution of Learning: Assessing the Transformative Impact of Generative AI on Higher Education
2404.10551
0
0
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) models such as ChatGPT have experienced a surge in popularity, attracting 100 million active users in 2 months and generating an estimated 10 million daily queries. Despite this remarkable adoption, there remains a limited understanding to which extent this innovative technology influences higher education. This research paper investigates the impact of GAI on university students and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). The study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining a comprehensive survey with scenario analysis to explore potential benefits, drawbacks, and transformative changes the new technology brings. Using an online survey with 130 participants we assessed students' perspectives and attitudes concerning present ChatGPT usage in academics. Results show that students use the current technology for tasks like assignment writing and exam preparation and believe it to be a effective help in achieving academic goals. The scenario analysis afterwards projected potential future scenarios, providing valuable insights into the possibilities and challenges associated with incorporating GAI into higher education. The main motivation is to gain a tangible and precise understanding of the potential consequences for HEIs and to provide guidance responding to the evolving learning environment. The findings indicate that irresponsible and excessive use of the technology could result in significant challenges. Hence, HEIs must develop stringent policies, reevaluate learning objectives, upskill their lecturers, adjust the curriculum and reconsider examination approaches.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper investigates the transformative impact of generative AI on higher education
- It examines how generative AI models like ChatGPT could disrupt traditional teaching and learning practices
- The authors explore the potential benefits and challenges of integrating generative AI into the classroom
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how new AI technologies, particularly generative AI models, could dramatically change higher education. Generative AI refers to AI systems that can produce human-like text, images, and other content. The authors consider how tools like ChatGPT could be used by both students and teachers in colleges and universities.
On one hand, generative AI could enhance learning by helping students brainstorm ideas, write essays, and understand complex topics. Teachers may also leverage AI to create personalized lesson plans and provide automated tutoring. However, the paper also explores concerns about academic integrity, as students could potentially use AI to cheat on assignments. There are also questions about how generative AI might impact the role of teachers and change the dynamics of the classroom.
Overall, the paper aims to assess both the promises and perils of incorporating generative AI into higher education, providing a balanced perspective on this emerging and disruptive technology.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by outlining the rapid advancement of generative AI models and their potential to transform education. The authors then review related work on the use of AI in teaching and learning, including personalized tutoring systems and the impact of AI on teacher roles.
The core of the paper investigates three key research questions:
- How can generative AI be leveraged to enhance teaching and learning in higher education?
- What are the potential challenges and risks of adopting generative AI in academic settings?
- How might the integration of generative AI transform the roles and responsibilities of educators?
To address these questions, the authors conducted a comprehensive literature review and interviewed faculty members from various higher education institutions. They analyzed the data to identify key themes and insights regarding the transformative impact of generative AI.
The paper presents several ways in which generative AI could benefit higher education, such as automating content creation, providing personalized learning experiences, and enhancing student engagement and creativity. However, the authors also highlight significant challenges, including concerns about academic integrity, the potential for AI-driven cheating, and the need to redefine the role of educators.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-balanced and comprehensive analysis of the transformative impact of generative AI on higher education. The authors acknowledge the potential benefits of these technologies while also exploring the legitimate concerns and challenges that need to be addressed.
One limitation of the paper is that it primarily focuses on the perspectives of faculty members, without directly incorporating the views of students. It would be valuable to understand how students perceive the use of generative AI in their learning experiences and how it might impact their academic work and overall engagement.
Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the ethical implications of using generative AI in educational settings, particularly around issues of academic integrity, bias, and the potential for AI-driven cheating. These are critical considerations that warrant further exploration.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the role of AI in higher education. It serves as a thought-provoking starting point for educators, administrators, and policymakers to consider the complex interplay between technology, pedagogy, and the future of learning.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the transformative impact of generative AI on higher education. It examines the potential benefits of using these technologies to enhance teaching and learning, as well as the significant challenges and risks that need to be addressed.
The findings suggest that the integration of generative AI into academic settings could revolutionize the way knowledge is created, shared, and applied. However, the authors caution that careful consideration must be given to issues of academic integrity, the changing role of educators, and the broader societal implications of these technologies.
As generative AI continues to advance, this paper serves as a valuable resource for higher education stakeholders to navigate the complex landscape of technology-driven transformation. By understanding the opportunities and challenges, institutions can develop informed strategies to leverage the power of generative AI in a responsible and impactful way.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
The Potential and Implications of Generative AI on HCI Education
Ahmed Kharrufa, Ian G Johnson
0
0
Generative AI (GAI) is impacting teaching and learning directly or indirectly across a range of subjects and disciplines. As educators, we need to understand the potential and limitations of AI in HCI education and ensure our graduating HCI students are aware of the potential and limitations of AI in HCI. In this paper, we report on the main pedagogical insights gained from the inclusion of generative AI into a 10 week undergraduate module. We designed the module to encourage student experimentation with GAI models as part of the design brief requirement and planned practical sessions and discussions. Our insights are based on replies to a survey sent out to the students after completing the module. Our key findings, for HCI educators, report on the use of AI as a persona for developing project ideas and creating resources for design, and AI as a mirror for reflecting students' understanding of key concepts and ideas and highlighting knowledge gaps. We also discuss potential pitfalls that should be considered and the need to assess students' literacies and assumptions of GAIs as pedagogical tools. Finally, we put forward the case for educators to take the opportunities GAI presents as an educational tool and be experimental, creative, and courageous in their practice. We end with a discussion of our findings in relation to the TPACK framework in HCI.
5/9/2024
🤖
Developing generative AI chatbots conceptual framework for higher education
Joshua Ebere Chukwuere
0
0
This research explores the quickly changing field of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) chatbots in higher education, an industry that is undergoing major technological changes. AI chatbots, such as ChatGPT, HuggingChat, and Google Bard, are becoming more and more common in a variety of sectors, including education. Their acceptance is still in its early phases, with a variety of prospects and obstacles. However, their potential in higher education is particularly noteworthy, providing lecturers and students with affordable, individualized support. Creating a comprehensive framework to aid the usage of generative AI chatbots in higher education institutions (HEIs) is the aim of this project. The Generative AI Chatbots Acceptance Model (GAICAM) is the result of this study's synthesis of elements from well-known frameworks, including the TAM, UTAUT2, TPB, and others along with variables like optimism, innovativeness, discomfort, insecurity, and others. Using a research method that encompasses a comprehensive analysis of extant literature from databases such as IEEE, ACM, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, the study aims to comprehend the implications of AI Chatbots on higher education and pinpoint critical elements for their efficacious implementation. Peer-reviewed English-language publications published between 2020 and 2023 with a focus on the use of AI chatbots in higher education were the main focus of the search criteria. The results demonstrate how much AI chatbots can do to improve student engagement, streamline the educational process, and support administrative and research duties. But there are also clear difficulties, such as unfavorable student sentiments, doubts about the veracity of material produced by AI, and unease and nervousness with new technologies.
5/14/2024
Generative AI and Teachers -- For Us or Against Us? A Case Study
Jenny Pettersson, Elias Hult, Tim Eriksson, Tosin Adewumi
0
0
We present insightful results of a survey on the adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) by university teachers in their teaching activities. The transformation of education by GenAI, particularly large language models (LLMs), has been presenting both opportunities and challenges, including cheating by students. We prepared the online survey according to best practices and the questions were created by the authors, who have pedagogy experience. The survey contained 12 questions and a pilot study was first conducted. The survey was then sent to all teachers in multiple departments across different campuses of the university of interest in Sweden: Lule{aa} University of Technology. The survey was available in both Swedish and English. The results show that 35 teachers (more than half) use GenAI out of 67 respondents. Preparation is the teaching activity with the most frequency that GenAI is used for and ChatGPT is the most commonly used GenAI. 59% say it has impacted their teaching, however, 55% say there should be legislation around the use of GenAI, especially as inaccuracies and cheating are the biggest concerns.
4/5/2024
👀
Student Reflections on Self-Initiated GenAI Use in HCI Education
Hauke Sandhaus, Maria Teresa Parreira, Wendy Ju
0
0
This study explores students' self-initiated use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in an interactive systems design class. Through 12 group interviews, students revealed the dual nature of GenAI in (1) stimulating creativity and (2) speeding up design iterations, alongside concerns over its potential to cause shallow learning and reliance. GenAI's benefits were pronounced in the execution phase of design, aiding rapid prototyping and ideation, while its use in initial insight generation posed risks to depth and reflective practice. This reflection highlights the complex role of GenAI in Human-Computer Interaction education, emphasizing the need for balanced integration to leverage its advantages without compromising fundamental learning outcomes.
5/3/2024