Auto FAQ Generation

Overview

• This paper proposes a system for automatically generating FAQ documents from large text documents.
• The system uses text summarization, sentence ranking, and question generation tools to extract salient questions and answers.
• Human evaluation found that 71% of the generated questions were considered meaningful by participants.

Plain English Explanation

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) documents are commonly used with text documents and websites to provide important information in a question-and-answer format. This can help readers quickly find answers to common questions or aid in comprehension of the main content.

The researchers in this paper [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/faq-gen-automated-system-to-generate-domain] hypothesize that the most important or "salient" sentences from a given document can serve as good answers to frequently asked questions about that document. To test this, they developed a system to automatically generate FAQ documents from large text documents, such as those found in the [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/improving-health-question-answering-reliable-time-aware] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

The system works by first using text summarization and sentence ranking techniques, like the TextRank algorithm, to identify the most important sentences in the document. It then applies question generation tools to create questions that correspond to those key sentences. Finally, the system applies some heuristics to filter out any invalid or nonsensical questions.

To evaluate the quality of the generated FAQs, the researchers had human participants review the questions and rate them on factors like grammar, meaningfulness, and whether the answer was present in the summarized text. On average, the participants thought 71% of the questions were meaningful, suggesting the system was able to produce a useful set of FAQs from the original documents.

This automated FAQ generation system could be helpful for quickly summarizing the main ideas in large text documents or providing readers with a shortcut to the key information, similar to approaches used in [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/retrieval-augmented-generation-domain-specific-question-answering] and [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/expertqa-expert-curated-questions-attributed-answers]. It could also be applied to [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/aspect-oriented-consumer-health-answer-summarization] health information or other domains where concise, question-based summaries would be useful.

Technical Explanation

The researchers in this paper propose an automated system for generating FAQ documents from large text corpora. The system uses a multi-step approach:

1. Text Summarization: The researchers first apply text summarization techniques to identify the most salient sentences in the original text documents.

2. Sentence Ranking: They then use the TextRank algorithm, a graph-based sentence ranking method, to further prioritize the most important sentences.

3. Question Generation: With the key sentences identified, the system applies question generation tools to create questions that correspond to those sentences.

4. Heuristic Filtering: Finally, the researchers apply some heuristics to filter out any invalid or nonsensical questions, such as those that are too short or do not have a clear answer in the summarized text.

To evaluate the quality of the generated FAQs, the researchers conducted a human evaluation study. Participants were asked to review the questions and rate them on factors like grammar, whether the question was meaningful, and whether the answer was present in the summarized context. On average, the participants thought 71% of the questions were meaningful.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations in their approach. First, the quality of the generated questions is still not high enough for real-world deployment, with only 71% of questions considered meaningful by participants. There is clearly room for improvement in the question generation and filtering components of the system.

Additionally, the researchers only evaluated the questions themselves, not the full FAQ document format. It's possible that the context and presentation of the FAQ could impact its usefulness to readers, which was not explored in this study.

Further research could also investigate applying this approach to different domains beyond philosophy, such as [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/aspect-oriented-consumer-health-answer-summarization] consumer health information, to see how the results may vary.

Overall, while the proposed system shows promise, more work is needed to refine the techniques and fully validate the usefulness of the automatically generated FAQ documents in real-world settings.

Conclusion

This paper presents an automated system for generating FAQ documents from large text corpora. By using text summarization, sentence ranking, and question generation tools, the system is able to extract salient questions and answers that can provide readers with a concise summary of the key ideas in the original documents.

While the human evaluation found room for improvement in the quality of the generated questions, the 71% meaningfulness rating suggests the system is on the right track. Further refinement of the techniques and testing in different domains could lead to a useful tool for quickly summarizing and surfacing the most important information in lengthy text-based resources.