Follow-Up Questions Improve Documents Generated by Large Language Models
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This study investigates the impact of Large Language Models generating follow-up questions to clarify user requests for short text documents.
- Users provided prompts asking the AI to produce certain documents, and the AI then generated questions to better understand the user's needs before generating the requested documents.
- Users answered the questions, then indicated their preference between a document generated using both the initial prompt and the questions/answers, versus a document generated using only the initial prompt.
- Users also provided feedback on their experience with the question-answering process.
- The findings show clear benefits to the question-asking approach in terms of document preference and overall user experience.
Plain English Explanation
This study looked at how Large Language Models can be used to help users get better results when they ask for certain documents or information. Users would give the AI a short request for a document, and the AI would then ask some follow-up questions to better understand exactly what the user wanted.
The users would answer the AI's questions, and then they could choose between two versions of the document - one made using just their original request, and one made using both the original request and the questions/answers. The users also gave feedback on how they felt about the question-answering process.
The study found that users tended to prefer the documents made using both the original request and the follow-up questions. They also said they had a better overall experience when the AI asked questions to clarify what they wanted. This suggests there are real benefits to AI systems asking questions to better understand user needs before trying to fulfill them.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a user study where participants provided prompts requesting short text documents they wanted the AI to generate. The AI then generated a series of follow-up questions to clarify the user's needs before producing the requested documents.
Participants answered the AI's questions, and then indicated their preference between two versions of the requested document - one generated using only the initial prompt, and one generated using both the initial prompt and the questions/answers. Participants also provided qualitative feedback on their experience with the question-answering process.
The results showed that users overwhelmingly preferred the documents generated using the combined prompt and question/answer information. Participants also reported a more positive experience when the AI asked clarifying questions, citing benefits like feeling "heard" and receiving documents that better matched their needs.
These findings suggest that incorporating question-asking capabilities into large language models can significantly improve the quality and relevance of the content they generate, as well as enhance the overall user experience.
Critical Analysis
The study provides encouraging evidence for the value of AI systems asking clarifying questions to better understand user needs. However, the research was limited to a specific task of generating short text documents, and the sample size was relatively small.
Additional research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of question-asking across a wider range of AI applications and user populations. There may also be scenarios where excessive questioning could frustrate users or add unnecessary friction to the interaction.
Furthermore, the paper does not delve into the specific prompt engineering techniques or architectural choices that enabled the AI to generate thoughtful follow-up questions. Insights into these implementation details could help other researchers and developers build more effective question-asking capabilities.
Overall, this study offers a promising starting point for integrating interactive, FAQ-generating abilities into large language models. But further exploration and validation will be needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and best practices for this approach.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the value of large language models that can engage in a dialogue with users, asking clarifying questions to better understand their needs before generating requested content. The findings suggest this approach leads to improved user satisfaction and more relevant results compared to a one-shot request-response model.
As AI systems become more prevalent in our daily lives, the ability to engage in thoughtful, back-and-forth interactions will likely be a key differentiator. This research highlights the potential for AI to provide a more personalized, collaborative experience that truly meets users' unique requirements. Continued innovation in this area could have far-reaching implications across a variety of AI-powered applications and services.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
Follow-Up Questions Improve Documents Generated by Large Language Models
Bernadette J Tix
This study investigates the impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) generating follow-up questions in response to user requests for short (1-page) text documents. Users interacted with a novel web-based AI system designed to ask follow-up questions. Users requested documents they would like the AI to produce. The AI then generated follow-up questions to clarify the user's needs or offer additional insights before generating the requested documents. After answering the questions, users were shown a document generated using both the initial request and the questions and answers, and a document generated using only the initial request. Users indicated which document they preferred and gave feedback about their experience with the question-answering process. The findings of this study show clear benefits to question-asking both in document preference and in the qualitative user experience. This study further shows that users found more value in questions which were thought-provoking, open-ended, or offered unique insights into the user's request as opposed to simple information-gathering questions.
Read more8/16/2024
0
Using LLMs to Investigate Correlations of Conversational Follow-up Queries with User Satisfaction
Hyunwoo Kim, Yoonseo Choi, Taehyun Yang, Honggu Lee, Chaneon Park, Yongju Lee, Jin Young Kim, Juho Kim
With large language models (LLMs), conversational search engines shift how users retrieve information from the web by enabling natural conversations to express their search intents over multiple turns. Users' natural conversation embodies rich but implicit signals of users' search intents and evaluation of search results to understand user experience with the system. However, it is underexplored how and why users ask follow-up queries to continue conversations with conversational search engines and how the follow-up queries signal users' satisfaction. From qualitative analysis of 250 conversational turns from an in-lab user evaluation of Naver Cue:, a commercial conversational search engine, we propose a taxonomy of 18 users' follow-up query patterns from conversational search, comprising two major axes: (1) users' motivations behind continuing conversations (N = 7) and (2) actions of follow-up queries (N = 11). Compared to the existing literature on query reformulations, we uncovered a new set of motivations and actions behind follow-up queries, including asking for subjective opinions or providing natural language feedback on the engine's responses. To analyze conversational search logs with our taxonomy in a scalable and efficient manner, we built an LLM-powered classifier (73% accuracy). With our classifier, we analyzed 2,061 conversational tuples collected from real-world usage logs of Cue: and examined how the conversation patterns from our taxonomy correlates with satisfaction. Our initial findings suggest some signals of dissatisfactions, such as Clarifying Queries, Excluding Condition, and Substituting Condition with follow-up queries. We envision our approach could contribute to automated evaluation of conversation search experience by providing satisfaction signals and grounds for realistic user simulations.
Read more7/19/2024
0
Ask Again, Then Fail: Large Language Models' Vacillations in Judgment
Qiming Xie, Zengzhi Wang, Yi Feng, Rui Xia
We observe that current conversational language models often waver in their judgments when faced with follow-up questions, even if the original judgment was correct. This wavering presents a significant challenge for generating reliable responses and building user trust. To comprehensively assess this issue, we introduce a textsc{Follow-up Questioning Mechanism} along with two metrics to quantify this inconsistency, confirming its widespread presence in current language models. To mitigate this issue, we explore various prompting strategies for closed-source models; moreover, we develop a training-based framework textsc{Unwavering-FQ} that teaches language models to maintain their originally correct judgments through synthesized high-quality preference data. Our experimental results confirm the effectiveness of our framework and its ability to enhance the general capabilities of models.
Read more6/12/2024
💬
0
Comparison of Large Language Models for Generating Contextually Relevant Questions
Ivo Lodovico Molina, Valdemar v{S}v'abensk'y, Tsubasa Minematsu, Li Chen, Fumiya Okubo, Atsushi Shimada
This study explores the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Automatic Question Generation in educational settings. Three LLMs are compared in their ability to create questions from university slide text without fine-tuning. Questions were obtained in a two-step pipeline: first, answer phrases were extracted from slides using Llama 2-Chat 13B; then, the three models generated questions for each answer. To analyze whether the questions would be suitable in educational applications for students, a survey was conducted with 46 students who evaluated a total of 246 questions across five metrics: clarity, relevance, difficulty, slide relation, and question-answer alignment. Results indicate that GPT-3.5 and Llama 2-Chat 13B outperform Flan T5 XXL by a small margin, particularly in terms of clarity and question-answer alignment. GPT-3.5 especially excels at tailoring questions to match the input answers. The contribution of this research is the analysis of the capacity of LLMs for Automatic Question Generation in education.
Read more7/31/2024