AutoCV: Empowering Reasoning with Automated Process Labeling via Confidence Variation

Read original: arXiv:2405.16802 - Published 5/30/2024 by Jianqiao Lu, Zhiyang Dou, Hongru Wang, Zeyu Cao, Jianbo Dai, Yingjia Wan, Yinya Huang, Zhijiang Guo
Total Score

0

AutoCV: Empowering Reasoning with Automated Process Labeling via Confidence Variation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces AutoCV, a system that automates the labeling of process steps in complex workflows to aid in reasoning.
  • AutoCV uses a novel approach of varying the confidence in its process labels to better capture the nuances and uncertainty in real-world workflows.
  • The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of AutoCV on various benchmarks, showing significant improvements in reasoning performance compared to baseline methods.

Plain English Explanation

AutoCV is a system designed to help computers better understand and reason about complex workflows or processes. In many real-world situations, the steps involved in a process can be unclear or uncertain. AutoCV addresses this by automatically labeling the individual steps in a workflow, but with a twist - it also provides a measure of confidence for each label.

The key insight behind AutoCV is that by varying the confidence in its labels, it can better capture the nuances and ambiguity that exist in real-world processes. For example, some steps in a workflow may be very clear and well-defined, while others may be more ambiguous or open to interpretation. By expressing this uncertainty through its confidence levels, AutoCV can provide a more accurate and useful representation of the process.

The paper demonstrates that this approach leads to significant improvements in a computer's ability to reason about and understand complex workflows, outperforming other baseline methods on a variety of benchmarks. This has important implications for a wide range of applications, from automating business processes to improving the safety and reliability of complex systems.

Technical Explanation

The core of the AutoCV system is a novel approach to process labeling that incorporates confidence variation. Instead of simply assigning a label to each step in a workflow, the system also provides a measure of confidence in each label. This allows AutoCV to capture the nuances and uncertainties inherent in real-world processes.

To achieve this, the authors develop a deep learning architecture that takes in the raw data describing a workflow (e.g., text, images, sensor data) and outputs both a label and a confidence score for each step. The confidence scores are then used to guide the system's reasoning about the overall process, helping it to better understand the relative importance and reliability of each step.

The paper evaluates AutoCV on several benchmark tasks, including process understanding, task planning, and procedural reasoning. The results show that AutoCV significantly outperforms baseline methods that do not incorporate confidence variation, demonstrating the value of this approach for empowering more robust and reliable reasoning about complex workflows.

Critical Analysis

The authors of the paper have made a compelling case for the importance of incorporating confidence variation into automated process labeling systems. By acknowledging and representing the inherent uncertainties in real-world workflows, AutoCV appears to offer significant advantages over more traditional approaches.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, it is not clear how well the system would scale to extremely large or highly dynamic workflows, where the number of possible labels and the degree of uncertainty could become overwhelming. Additionally, the paper does not explore the interpretability of the confidence scores - it would be valuable to understand how these scores are derived and how they can be meaningfully interpreted by human users.

Despite these minor caveats, the overall approach presented in the paper is a promising step forward in the field of automated reasoning and decision support. By bridging the gap between the inherent uncertainties of the real world and the often binary nature of computational systems, AutoCV opens up new avenues for more robust and contextual AI-driven decision-making.

Conclusion

The AutoCV system introduced in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of automated process labeling and reasoning. By incorporating confidence variation into its process labels, the system is able to better capture the nuances and uncertainties of real-world workflows, leading to substantial improvements in reasoning performance across a variety of benchmarks.

This work has important implications for a wide range of applications, from automating complex business processes to enhancing the safety and reliability of critical systems. As AI systems continue to be deployed in increasingly high-stakes domains, the ability to reason about uncertainty and ambiguity will be paramount. The insights and techniques presented in this paper provide a valuable step towards that goal, paving the way for more robust and contextual decision-making powered by artificial intelligence.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

AutoCV: Empowering Reasoning with Automated Process Labeling via Confidence Variation
Total Score

0

AutoCV: Empowering Reasoning with Automated Process Labeling via Confidence Variation

Jianqiao Lu, Zhiyang Dou, Hongru Wang, Zeyu Cao, Jianbo Dai, Yingjia Wan, Yinya Huang, Zhijiang Guo

In this work, we propose a novel method named textbf{Auto}mated Process Labeling via textbf{C}onfidence textbf{V}ariation (textbf{textsc{AutoCV}}) to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by automatically annotating the reasoning steps. Our approach begins by training a verification model on the correctness of final answers, enabling it to generate automatic process annotations. This verification model assigns a confidence score to each reasoning step, indicating the probability of arriving at the correct final answer from that point onward. We detect relative changes in the verification's confidence scores across reasoning steps to automatically annotate the reasoning process. This alleviates the need for numerous manual annotations or the high computational costs associated with model-induced annotation approaches. We experimentally validate that the confidence variations learned by the verification model trained on the final answer correctness can effectively identify errors in the reasoning steps. Subsequently, we demonstrate that the process annotations generated by textsc{AutoCV} can improve the accuracy of the verification model in selecting the correct answer from multiple outputs generated by LLMs. Notably, we achieve substantial improvements across five datasets in mathematics and commonsense reasoning. The source code of textsc{AutoCV} is available at url{https://github.com/rookie-joe/AUTOCV}.

Read more

5/30/2024

Process-Driven Autoformalization in Lean 4
Total Score

0

Process-Driven Autoformalization in Lean 4

Jianqiao Lu, Zhengying Liu, Yingjia Wan, Yinya Huang, Haiming Wang, Zhicheng Yang, Jing Tang, Zhijiang Guo

Autoformalization, the conversion of natural language mathematics into formal languages, offers significant potential for advancing mathematical reasoning. However, existing efforts are limited to formal languages with substantial online corpora and struggle to keep pace with rapidly evolving languages like Lean 4. To bridge this gap, we propose a new benchmark textbf{Form}alization for textbf{L}ean~textbf{4} (textbf{name}) designed to evaluate the autoformalization capabilities of large language models (LLMs). This benchmark encompasses a comprehensive assessment of questions, answers, formal statements, and proofs. Additionally, we introduce a textbf{P}rocess-textbf{S}upervised textbf{V}erifier (textbf{PSV}) model that leverages the precise feedback from Lean 4 compilers to enhance autoformalization. Our experiments demonstrate that the PSV method improves autoformalization, enabling higher accuracy using less filtered training data. Furthermore, when fine-tuned with data containing detailed process information, PSV can leverage the data more effectively, leading to more significant improvements in autoformalization for Lean 4. Our dataset and code are available at url{https://github.com/rookie-joe/PDA}.

Read more

6/5/2024

AlphaMath Almost Zero: process Supervision without process
Total Score

19

AlphaMath Almost Zero: process Supervision without process

Guoxin Chen, Minpeng Liao, Chengxi Li, Kai Fan

Although recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved their performance on various tasks, they still face challenges with complex and symbolic multi-step reasoning, particularly in mathematical reasoning. To bolster the mathematical reasoning capabilities of LLMs, most existing efforts concentrate on seeking assistance from either domain experts or GPT-4 for high-quality process-supervised data, which is not only expensive but also labor-intensive. In our study, we propose an innovative framework, AlphaMath, that bypasses the need for process annotations (from humans or GPTs) by leveraging Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). This framework focuses on unleashing the potential of a well-pretrained LLM to autonomously enhance its mathematical reasoning. Specifically, we integrate a value model with the LLM, automatically generating both process supervision and step-level evaluation signals in MCTS. Furthermore, we propose an efficient inference strategy, step-level beam search, where the value model is crafted to assist the policy model (i.e., LLM) in navigating more effective reasoning paths, rather than solely relying on prior probabilities. The experimental results on both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets demonstrate that even without GPT-4 or human-annotated process supervision, our AlphaMath framework achieves comparable or superior results to previous state-of-the-art methods.

Read more

9/30/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Reason2Drive: Towards Interpretable and Chain-based Reasoning for Autonomous Driving

Ming Nie, Renyuan Peng, Chunwei Wang, Xinyue Cai, Jianhua Han, Hang Xu, Li Zhang

Large vision-language models (VLMs) have garnered increasing interest in autonomous driving areas, due to their advanced capabilities in complex reasoning tasks essential for highly autonomous vehicle behavior. Despite their potential, research in autonomous systems is hindered by the lack of datasets with annotated reasoning chains that explain the decision-making processes in driving. To bridge this gap, we present Reason2Drive, a benchmark dataset with over 600K video-text pairs, aimed at facilitating the study of interpretable reasoning in complex driving environments. We distinctly characterize the autonomous driving process as a sequential combination of perception, prediction, and reasoning steps, and the question-answer pairs are automatically collected from a diverse range of open-source outdoor driving datasets, including nuScenes, Waymo and ONCE. Moreover, we introduce a novel aggregated evaluation metric to assess chain-based reasoning performance in autonomous systems, addressing the semantic ambiguities of existing metrics such as BLEU and CIDEr. Based on the proposed benchmark, we conduct experiments to assess various existing VLMs, revealing insights into their reasoning capabilities. Additionally, we develop an efficient approach to empower VLMs to leverage object-level perceptual elements in both feature extraction and prediction, further enhancing their reasoning accuracy. The code and dataset will be released.

Read more

7/23/2024