Automated Detection of Label Errors in Semantic Segmentation Datasets via Deep Learning and Uncertainty Quantification

Overview

• This research paper presents a method for detecting label errors in image datasets used for semantic segmentation.
• Semantic segmentation datasets require extensive human labor to annotate, and label errors can easily be overlooked during review.
• Label errors can lead to biased benchmarks and performance degradation of deep neural networks trained on these datasets.
• The authors propose a novel approach that leverages the pixel-wise predictions of semantic segmentation models and component-level uncertainty quantification to identify label errors.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a new way to detect label errors in image datasets used for semantic segmentation. Semantic segmentation is the task of assigning a category label to each pixel in an image, such as "road," "building," or "person." Creating these types of datasets requires a lot of manual effort from human annotators, and it's easy for mistakes to slip through during the review process.

These label errors can cause problems when the datasets are used to train deep neural networks for semantic segmentation. The networks may learn the wrong associations and end up performing poorly, even on images without label errors. To address this, the researchers have come up with a way to use the networks' own uncertainty estimates to detect label errors.

The key insight is that the networks tend to be more uncertain about pixels at the boundaries between different objects or regions in the image. By looking at the patterns of uncertainty across entire connected components (groups of neighboring pixels) in the segmentation, the researchers can identify which labels are likely to be wrong. This allows them to catch and fix errors in the dataset without having to manually review every single pixel.

Technical Explanation

The researchers present a novel approach for detecting label errors in semantic segmentation datasets. Semantic segmentation models produce pixel-wise predictions, which makes identifying label errors through uncertainty quantification a complex task. The authors propose lifting the consideration of uncertainty to the level of predicted components (connected regions of pixels) rather than individual pixels.

They benchmark their approach by intentionally introducing label errors into the Cityscapes and CARLA driving simulator datasets. Their experiments show that the method is able to detect the majority of label errors while maintaining a low false positive rate. This is a significant improvement over previous uncertainty-based approaches, which were hampered by the high uncertainty at object boundaries.

Additionally, the researchers apply their method to widely-used semantic segmentation datasets and provide a collection of identified label errors, along with sample statistics. This serves as a valuable resource for the computer vision community to improve the quality of these important benchmarks.

The key technical contribution is the insight that component-level uncertainty quantification is more effective than pixel-level for detecting label errors in semantic segmentation. By focusing on the uncertainty patterns of entire connected regions rather than individual pixels, the method is able to more reliably identify mislabeled areas.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have presented a well-designed and thorough approach to the important problem of label error detection in semantic segmentation datasets. The use of component-level uncertainty quantification is a clever and effective solution to the challenges posed by the high uncertainty at object boundaries.

One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on manually curated datasets (Cityscapes and CARLA) for benchmarking. While these provide a controlled environment to assess the method's performance, it would be valuable to see how the approach scales and performs on larger, real-world datasets collected in the wild.

Additionally, the paper does not address the issue of how to prioritize the detected label errors for human review and correction. In a large-scale dataset, the method may identify thousands of potential errors, and providing guidance on which ones to focus on first would be a helpful next step.

Despite these minor concerns, the research represents a significant contribution to the field of computer vision. By improving the quality of semantic segmentation datasets, the work has the potential to lead to more robust and reliable deep learning models for a wide range of applications, from autonomous driving to medical image analysis.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a novel approach for detecting label errors in semantic segmentation datasets. The key innovation is the use of component-level uncertainty quantification, which allows the method to reliably identify mislabeled regions in the data.

The authors have demonstrated the effectiveness of their approach through extensive experiments on curated datasets, and they have also applied it to widely-used benchmarks, providing a valuable collection of identified label errors. This work has important implications for improving the quality of semantic segmentation datasets and, by extension, the performance of deep learning models trained on them.

Overall, this research represents a significant advancement in the field of computer vision, and it lays the groundwork for further improvements in dataset curation and model robustness.