Automated Red Teaming with GOAT: the Generative Offensive Agent Tester
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces GOAT, an automated red teaming system that uses a generative adversarial network (GAN) to test the security of large language models (LLMs).
- GOAT generates adversarial prompts that attempt to elicit harmful or undesirable responses from the target LLM, helping identify potential vulnerabilities.
- The paper describes the GOAT architecture, training process, and evaluation on several popular LLMs, including GPT-3 and InstructGPT.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a tool called GOAT (the Generative Offensive Agent Tester) that can automatically test the security of large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and InstructGPT. LLMs are AI systems that can generate human-like text, and they are becoming increasingly powerful and widely used.
However, these LLMs can also potentially be misused to generate harmful or undesirable content. GOAT is designed to find vulnerabilities in LLMs by generating "adversarial prompts" - prompts that are specifically crafted to try to elicit harmful responses from the LLM.
GOAT uses a type of AI called a generative adversarial network (GAN) to generate these adversarial prompts. The GAN system "competes" with the LLM, trying to find prompts that will fool the LLM into producing unsafe or unintended outputs. By testing LLMs with these adversarial prompts, the researchers can identify potential security issues and vulnerabilities.
The paper describes how GOAT was built and evaluated on several popular LLMs. The results show that GOAT can effectively find vulnerabilities that could be exploited by bad actors. This type of automated "red teaming" (security testing) is an important step in ensuring the responsible development and deployment of powerful AI language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces GOAT, a system for automating the red teaming (security testing) of large language models (LLMs). GOAT uses a generative adversarial network (GAN) architecture to generate adversarial prompts that attempt to elicit harmful or undesirable responses from the target LLM.
The GOAT system consists of two main components: a prompt generator (the "adversary") and a language model (the "defender"). The prompt generator is trained on a dataset of benign and malicious prompts to learn how to craft adversarial inputs that can fool the target LLM. The language model represents the LLM being tested, and GOAT optimizes the prompt generator to find vulnerabilities in the LLM's behavior.
The training process involves the prompt generator and language model playing a repeated "game" where the prompt generator tries to find prompts that cause the language model to produce undesirable outputs, and the language model tries to resist these adversarial inputs. Through this adversarial training, GOAT learns to generate prompts that are effective at exposing potential security issues in the target LLM.
The paper evaluates GOAT on several popular LLMs, including GPT-3 and InstructGPT. The results show that GOAT can successfully identify a range of vulnerabilities, such as the generation of toxic or biased content, hallucination of false information, and failure to follow instructions. These findings highlight the importance of rigorous security testing for powerful AI language models to ensure their safe and responsible deployment.
Critical Analysis
The GOAT paper presents a novel and important approach to automated red teaming of large language models. By using a GAN-based system to generate adversarial prompts, the researchers have developed a scalable way to test LLM security that goes beyond simple rule-based or human-curated attacks.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations of the GOAT system. First, the adversarial prompts generated by GOAT may not fully capture the range of real-world threats that LLMs could face. The training data and adversarial objective function used by GOAT may miss certain types of vulnerabilities or fail to generalize to novel attack vectors.
Additionally, the paper notes that GOAT's effectiveness is dependent on the quality and coverage of the training data used to build the prompt generator. If the dataset does not include a sufficiently diverse set of malicious prompts, GOAT may struggle to find certain types of vulnerabilities.
Further research could explore ways to make GOAT more robust, such as incorporating additional data sources, developing more sophisticated adversarial objectives, or combining GOAT with other security testing approaches. Investigating the transferability of GOAT's discoveries across different LLM architectures would also be an important area for future work.
Overall, the GOAT system represents a valuable contribution to the field of AI safety and security. As LLMs become more powerful and ubiquitous, tools like GOAT will be essential for ensuring these systems are developed and deployed responsibly.
Conclusion
The GOAT paper introduces an automated red teaming system for testing the security of large language models. By using a generative adversarial network to craft adversarial prompts, GOAT can effectively identify vulnerabilities in LLMs that could be exploited to generate harmful or undesirable outputs.
The technical evaluation of GOAT on popular LLMs like GPT-3 and InstructGPT demonstrates the system's ability to uncover a range of security issues, including the generation of toxic content, hallucination of false information, and failure to follow instructions.
While GOAT has some limitations, the paper highlights the critical importance of rigorous security testing for powerful AI language models. As LLMs become more widely adopted, tools like GOAT will be essential for ensuring these systems are developed and used responsibly, with proper safeguards against potential misuse.
The GOAT approach represents a significant advance in the field of AI safety and security, and the insights from this research can help guide the continued development of robust and trustworthy large language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
New!Automated Red Teaming with GOAT: the Generative Offensive Agent Tester
Maya Pavlova, Erik Brinkman, Krithika Iyer, Vitor Albiero, Joanna Bitton, Hailey Nguyen, Joe Li, Cristian Canton Ferrer, Ivan Evtimov, Aaron Grattafiori
Red teaming assesses how large language models (LLMs) can produce content that violates norms, policies, and rules set during their safety training. However, most existing automated methods in the literature are not representative of the way humans tend to interact with AI models. Common users of AI models may not have advanced knowledge of adversarial machine learning methods or access to model internals, and they do not spend a lot of time crafting a single highly effective adversarial prompt. Instead, they are likely to make use of techniques commonly shared online and exploit the multiturn conversational nature of LLMs. While manual testing addresses this gap, it is an inefficient and often expensive process. To address these limitations, we introduce the Generative Offensive Agent Tester (GOAT), an automated agentic red teaming system that simulates plain language adversarial conversations while leveraging multiple adversarial prompting techniques to identify vulnerabilities in LLMs. We instantiate GOAT with 7 red teaming attacks by prompting a general-purpose model in a way that encourages reasoning through the choices of methods available, the current target model's response, and the next steps. Our approach is designed to be extensible and efficient, allowing human testers to focus on exploring new areas of risk while automation covers the scaled adversarial stress-testing of known risk territory. We present the design and evaluation of GOAT, demonstrating its effectiveness in identifying vulnerabilities in state-of-the-art LLMs, with an ASR@10 of 97% against Llama 3.1 and 88% against GPT-4 on the JailbreakBench dataset.
Read more10/3/2024
0
Holistic Automated Red Teaming for Large Language Models through Top-Down Test Case Generation and Multi-turn Interaction
Jinchuan Zhang, Yan Zhou, Yaxin Liu, Ziming Li, Songlin Hu
Automated red teaming is an effective method for identifying misaligned behaviors in large language models (LLMs). Existing approaches, however, often focus primarily on improving attack success rates while overlooking the need for comprehensive test case coverage. Additionally, most of these methods are limited to single-turn red teaming, failing to capture the multi-turn dynamics of real-world human-machine interactions. To overcome these limitations, we propose HARM (Holistic Automated Red teaMing), which scales up the diversity of test cases using a top-down approach based on an extensible, fine-grained risk taxonomy. Our method also leverages a novel fine-tuning strategy and reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate multi-turn adversarial probing in a human-like manner. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework enables a more systematic understanding of model vulnerabilities and offers more targeted guidance for the alignment process.
Read more9/26/2024
0
RedAgent: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Context-aware Autonomous Language Agent
Huiyu Xu, Wenhui Zhang, Zhibo Wang, Feng Xiao, Rui Zheng, Yunhe Feng, Zhongjie Ba, Kui Ren
Recently, advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 have been integrated into many real-world applications like Code Copilot. These applications have significantly expanded the attack surface of LLMs, exposing them to a variety of threats. Among them, jailbreak attacks that induce toxic responses through jailbreak prompts have raised critical safety concerns. To identify these threats, a growing number of red teaming approaches simulate potential adversarial scenarios by crafting jailbreak prompts to test the target LLM. However, existing red teaming methods do not consider the unique vulnerabilities of LLM in different scenarios, making it difficult to adjust the jailbreak prompts to find context-specific vulnerabilities. Meanwhile, these methods are limited to refining jailbreak templates using a few mutation operations, lacking the automation and scalability to adapt to different scenarios. To enable context-aware and efficient red teaming, we abstract and model existing attacks into a coherent concept called jailbreak strategy and propose a multi-agent LLM system named RedAgent that leverages these strategies to generate context-aware jailbreak prompts. By self-reflecting on contextual feedback in an additional memory buffer, RedAgent continuously learns how to leverage these strategies to achieve effective jailbreaks in specific contexts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our system can jailbreak most black-box LLMs in just five queries, improving the efficiency of existing red teaming methods by two times. Additionally, RedAgent can jailbreak customized LLM applications more efficiently. By generating context-aware jailbreak prompts towards applications on GPTs, we discover 60 severe vulnerabilities of these real-world applications with only two queries per vulnerability. We have reported all found issues and communicated with OpenAI and Meta for bug fixes.
Read more7/24/2024
0
Exploring Straightforward Conversational Red-Teaming
George Kour, Naama Zwerdling, Marcel Zalmanovici, Ateret Anaby-Tavor, Ora Nova Fandina, Eitan Farchi
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in business dialogue systems but they pose security and ethical risks. Multi-turn conversations, where context influences the model's behavior, can be exploited to produce undesired responses. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of utilizing off-the-shelf LLMs in straightforward red-teaming approaches, where an attacker LLM aims to elicit undesired output from a target LLM, comparing both single-turn and conversational red-teaming tactics. Our experiments offer insights into various usage strategies that significantly affect their performance as red teamers. They suggest that off-the-shelf models can act as effective red teamers and even adjust their attack strategy based on past attempts, although their effectiveness decreases with greater alignment.
Read more9/10/2024