Holistic Automated Red Teaming for Large Language Models through Top-Down Test Case Generation and Multi-turn Interaction
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper proposes a holistic approach to automated red teaming for large language models.
- The method uses top-down test case generation and multi-turn interaction to comprehensively evaluate the models.
- Key components include generating diverse test cases, conducting multi-turn dialogues, and identifying potential vulnerabilities.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a way to thoroughly test and assess large language models, which are AI systems that can engage in human-like conversations. The researchers developed an automated red teaming approach that generates a wide range of test scenarios to probe the language model's capabilities and limitations.
Instead of just asking the model simple questions, the method involves conducting multi-turn dialogues where the test cases become more complex over the course of the conversation. This allows the researchers to uncover potential vulnerabilities or problematic behaviors that might not be apparent from single-turn interactions.
The key innovations are the use of top-down test case generation to create diverse and comprehensive test scenarios, and the multi-turn interaction to deeply explore the language model's responses. This holistic approach aims to provide a more rigorous and thorough evaluation of large language models compared to traditional testing methods.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel automated red teaming approach for evaluating large language models. The core components are:
-
Test Case Generation: The researchers use a top-down approach to generate a diverse set of test cases that cover a wide range of potential inputs and conversational scenarios. This involves defining high-level test objectives and then iteratively refining them into more specific test cases.
-
Multi-turn Interaction: Rather than just evaluating the language model's responses to individual prompts, the system conducts multi-turn dialogues. This allows for the exploration of the model's capabilities and limitations over the course of an extended interaction.
-
Vulnerability Identification: By analyzing the language model's responses across the test cases and multi-turn dialogues, the system aims to identify potential vulnerabilities, biases, or problematic behaviors that may not be evident from standalone prompts.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through extensive experiments on large language models. Their results show that the holistic red teaming method can uncover a broader range of issues compared to traditional testing techniques.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous approach to automated red teaming of large language models. The key strengths are the use of top-down test case generation to ensure broad coverage, and the multi-turn interaction to deeply probe the models' capabilities.
However, the paper acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research. For example, the test case generation is still largely manual, and automating this process could further improve the scalability of the approach. Additionally, the researchers note that their current method may not fully capture all possible real-world usage scenarios and interactions.
Another potential limitation is the focus on identifying vulnerabilities and problematic behaviors. While this is certainly an important aspect of model evaluation, it may be valuable to also explore the models' strengths and positive capabilities in a more balanced manner.
Conclusion
This research presents a significant advance in the field of large language model evaluation by introducing a holistic automated red teaming approach. By combining top-down test case generation and multi-turn interaction, the method provides a more comprehensive and rigorous assessment of these AI systems.
The insights gained from this work can help improve the development and deployment of large language models, ensuring they are more robust, reliable, and aligned with societal needs. As language models continue to play an increasingly important role in various applications, the ability to thoroughly test and validate their behavior becomes crucial.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Holistic Automated Red Teaming for Large Language Models through Top-Down Test Case Generation and Multi-turn Interaction
Jinchuan Zhang, Yan Zhou, Yaxin Liu, Ziming Li, Songlin Hu
Automated red teaming is an effective method for identifying misaligned behaviors in large language models (LLMs). Existing approaches, however, often focus primarily on improving attack success rates while overlooking the need for comprehensive test case coverage. Additionally, most of these methods are limited to single-turn red teaming, failing to capture the multi-turn dynamics of real-world human-machine interactions. To overcome these limitations, we propose HARM (Holistic Automated Red teaMing), which scales up the diversity of test cases using a top-down approach based on an extensible, fine-grained risk taxonomy. Our method also leverages a novel fine-tuning strategy and reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate multi-turn adversarial probing in a human-like manner. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework enables a more systematic understanding of model vulnerabilities and offers more targeted guidance for the alignment process.
Read more9/26/2024
🤿
0
DART: Deep Adversarial Automated Red Teaming for LLM Safety
Bojian Jiang, Yi Jing, Tianhao Shen, Qing Yang, Deyi Xiong
Manual Red teaming is a commonly-used method to identify vulnerabilities in large language models (LLMs), which, is costly and unscalable. In contrast, automated red teaming uses a Red LLM to automatically generate adversarial prompts to the Target LLM, offering a scalable way for safety vulnerability detection. However, the difficulty of building a powerful automated Red LLM lies in the fact that the safety vulnerabilities of the Target LLM are dynamically changing with the evolution of the Target LLM. To mitigate this issue, we propose a Deep Adversarial Automated Red Teaming (DART) framework in which the Red LLM and Target LLM are deeply and dynamically interacting with each other in an iterative manner. In each iteration, in order to generate successful attacks as many as possible, the Red LLM not only takes into account the responses from the Target LLM, but also adversarially adjust its attacking directions by monitoring the global diversity of generated attacks across multiple iterations. Simultaneously, to explore dynamically changing safety vulnerabilities of the Target LLM, we allow the Target LLM to enhance its safety via an active learning based data selection mechanism. Experimential results demonstrate that DART significantly reduces the safety risk of the target LLM. For human evaluation on Anthropic Harmless dataset, compared to the instruction-tuning target LLM, DART eliminates the violation risks by 53.4%. We will release the datasets and codes of DART soon.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Exploring Straightforward Conversational Red-Teaming
George Kour, Naama Zwerdling, Marcel Zalmanovici, Ateret Anaby-Tavor, Ora Nova Fandina, Eitan Farchi
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in business dialogue systems but they pose security and ethical risks. Multi-turn conversations, where context influences the model's behavior, can be exploited to produce undesired responses. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of utilizing off-the-shelf LLMs in straightforward red-teaming approaches, where an attacker LLM aims to elicit undesired output from a target LLM, comparing both single-turn and conversational red-teaming tactics. Our experiments offer insights into various usage strategies that significantly affect their performance as red teamers. They suggest that off-the-shelf models can act as effective red teamers and even adjust their attack strategy based on past attempts, although their effectiveness decreases with greater alignment.
Read more9/10/2024
0
New!Automated Red Teaming with GOAT: the Generative Offensive Agent Tester
Maya Pavlova, Erik Brinkman, Krithika Iyer, Vitor Albiero, Joanna Bitton, Hailey Nguyen, Joe Li, Cristian Canton Ferrer, Ivan Evtimov, Aaron Grattafiori
Red teaming assesses how large language models (LLMs) can produce content that violates norms, policies, and rules set during their safety training. However, most existing automated methods in the literature are not representative of the way humans tend to interact with AI models. Common users of AI models may not have advanced knowledge of adversarial machine learning methods or access to model internals, and they do not spend a lot of time crafting a single highly effective adversarial prompt. Instead, they are likely to make use of techniques commonly shared online and exploit the multiturn conversational nature of LLMs. While manual testing addresses this gap, it is an inefficient and often expensive process. To address these limitations, we introduce the Generative Offensive Agent Tester (GOAT), an automated agentic red teaming system that simulates plain language adversarial conversations while leveraging multiple adversarial prompting techniques to identify vulnerabilities in LLMs. We instantiate GOAT with 7 red teaming attacks by prompting a general-purpose model in a way that encourages reasoning through the choices of methods available, the current target model's response, and the next steps. Our approach is designed to be extensible and efficient, allowing human testers to focus on exploring new areas of risk while automation covers the scaled adversarial stress-testing of known risk territory. We present the design and evaluation of GOAT, demonstrating its effectiveness in identifying vulnerabilities in state-of-the-art LLMs, with an ASR@10 of 97% against Llama 3.1 and 88% against GPT-4 on the JailbreakBench dataset.
Read more10/3/2024