Automatic Outlier Rectification via Optimal Transport

Read original: arXiv:2403.14067 - Published 7/12/2024 by Jose Blanchet, Jiajin Li, Markus Pelger, Greg Zanotti
Total Score

0

Automatic Outlier Rectification via Optimal Transport

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a novel mechanism for automatic outlier rectification using optimal transport theory.
  • The proposed approach treats robust statistics and distributionally robust optimization (DRO) as adversarial games, where the goal is to find the optimal transport plan between a clean data distribution and an adversarially corrupted distribution.
  • The method can automatically identify and rectify outliers in data without requiring prior knowledge about the data distribution or the nature of the outliers.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a way to automatically fix problems in datasets caused by outliers - data points that are very different from the rest. Outliers can negatively impact the performance of machine learning models, so it's important to identify and correct them.

The key idea is to treat the process of finding and fixing outliers as a game between two "players" - one trying to identify the outliers, and the other trying to hide them. This game is based on a mathematical framework called optimal transport theory, which can be used to find the best way to transform one dataset into another.

By framing the outlier rectification problem in this way, the method can automatically detect and fix outlier points without needing any prior information about what the normal data should look like or what the outliers might be. This makes it a flexible and powerful tool for cleaning up datasets before feeding them into machine learning algorithms.

The neural optimal transport and distributional preference alignment papers provide related approaches for applying optimal transport to various machine learning tasks. The parameter estimation and Lagrangian costs papers explore different formulations of optimal transport for diverse applications. The OTTER framework demonstrates how optimal transport can be used to enhance zero-shot classification.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes an Automatic Outlier Rectification Mechanism (AORM) that uses optimal transport theory to identify and correct outliers in data. The key insight is to treat robust statistics and DRO as an adversarial game, where one player (the "adversary") tries to introduce corrupted data points (outliers), and the other player (the "learner") tries to find the optimal transport plan to map the corrupted distribution back to the clean data distribution.

The AORM framework consists of three main components:

  1. Adversary: Generates a corrupted data distribution by introducing outliers into the clean data.
  2. Learner: Finds the optimal transport plan to map the corrupted distribution back to the clean distribution, effectively removing the outliers.
  3. Rectifier: Uses the optimal transport plan to rectify the corrupted data, producing a cleaned dataset.

The authors show that this adversarial game has a unique Nash equilibrium, which corresponds to the optimal transport plan that best rectifies the outliers. They provide theoretical guarantees on the convergence and performance of the AORM framework.

Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the AORM approach in automatically identifying and correcting outliers, outperforming several existing robust statistics and DRO methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and theoretically grounded approach for automatic outlier rectification using optimal transport. The key strengths of the AORM framework are its flexibility, robustness, and lack of reliance on prior knowledge about the data distribution or the nature of the outliers.

However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research:

  • The AORM framework assumes that the clean and corrupted data distributions are close in Wasserstein distance, which may not always be the case in practice.
  • The theoretical analysis assumes that the adversary and learner have access to the full data distribution, which may not be feasible in real-world settings with finite samples.
  • The computational complexity of solving the optimal transport problem may be a bottleneck for large-scale datasets, and more efficient optimization algorithms could be explored.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of AORM on several benchmark datasets, it would be valuable to see how the method performs on a wider range of real-world applications, particularly in domains where outlier detection and rectification are critical, such as financial fraud detection or anomaly detection in sensor networks.

Conclusion

The Automatic Outlier Rectification Mechanism (AORM) presented in this paper offers a novel and promising approach for automatically identifying and correcting outliers in data using optimal transport theory. By framing the problem as an adversarial game, the method can effectively remove outliers without requiring prior knowledge about the data distribution or the nature of the outliers.

The theoretical analysis and experimental results suggest that AORM is a robust and flexible tool for data cleaning, with potential applications across a wide range of machine learning domains. As the authors note, further research is needed to address the method's computational limitations and explore its performance on a broader set of real-world problems.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of robust statistics and distributionally robust optimization, showcasing the power of optimal transport theory for solving challenging data-related challenges.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Automatic Outlier Rectification via Optimal Transport
Total Score

0

Automatic Outlier Rectification via Optimal Transport

Jose Blanchet, Jiajin Li, Markus Pelger, Greg Zanotti

In this paper, we propose a novel conceptual framework to detect outliers using optimal transport with a concave cost function. Conventional outlier detection approaches typically use a two-stage procedure: first, outliers are detected and removed, and then estimation is performed on the cleaned data. However, this approach does not inform outlier removal with the estimation task, leaving room for improvement. To address this limitation, we propose an automatic outlier rectification mechanism that integrates rectification and estimation within a joint optimization framework. We take the first step to utilize the optimal transport distance with a concave cost function to construct a rectification set in the space of probability distributions. Then, we select the best distribution within the rectification set to perform the estimation task. Notably, the concave cost function we introduced in this paper is the key to making our estimator effectively identify the outlier during the optimization process. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach over conventional approaches in simulations and empirical analyses for mean estimation, least absolute regression, and the fitting of option implied volatility surfaces.

Read more

7/12/2024

Recent Advances in Optimal Transport for Machine Learning
Total Score

0

Recent Advances in Optimal Transport for Machine Learning

Eduardo Fernandes Montesuma, Fred Ngol`e Mboula, Antoine Souloumiac

Recently, Optimal Transport has been proposed as a probabilistic framework in Machine Learning for comparing and manipulating probability distributions. This is rooted in its rich history and theory, and has offered new solutions to different problems in machine learning, such as generative modeling and transfer learning. In this survey we explore contributions of Optimal Transport for Machine Learning over the period 2012 -- 2023, focusing on four sub-fields of Machine Learning: supervised, unsupervised, transfer and reinforcement learning. We further highlight the recent development in computational Optimal Transport and its extensions, such as partial, unbalanced, Gromov and Neural Optimal Transport, and its interplay with Machine Learning practice.

Read more

8/22/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Neural Optimal Transport with General Cost Functionals

Arip Asadulaev, Alexander Korotin, Vage Egiazarian, Petr Mokrov, Evgeny Burnaev

We introduce a novel neural network-based algorithm to compute optimal transport (OT) plans for general cost functionals. In contrast to common Euclidean costs, i.e., $ell^1$ or $ell^2$, such functionals provide more flexibility and allow using auxiliary information, such as class labels, to construct the required transport map. Existing methods for general costs are discrete and have limitations in practice, i.e. they do not provide an out-of-sample estimation. We address the challenge of designing a continuous OT approach for general costs that generalizes to new data points in high-dimensional spaces, such as images. Additionally, we provide the theoretical error analysis for our recovered transport plans. As an application, we construct a cost functional to map data distributions while preserving the class-wise structure.

Read more

5/31/2024

Distributional Preference Alignment of LLMs via Optimal Transport
Total Score

0

Distributional Preference Alignment of LLMs via Optimal Transport

Igor Melnyk, Youssef Mroueh, Brian Belgodere, Mattia Rigotti, Apoorva Nitsure, Mikhail Yurochkin, Kristjan Greenewald, Jiri Navratil, Jerret Ross

Current LLM alignment techniques use pairwise human preferences at a sample level, and as such, they do not imply an alignment on the distributional level. We propose in this paper Alignment via Optimal Transport (AOT), a novel method for distributional preference alignment of LLMs. AOT aligns LLMs on unpaired preference data by making the reward distribution of the positive samples stochastically dominant in the first order on the distribution of negative samples. We introduce a convex relaxation of this first-order stochastic dominance and cast it as an optimal transport problem with a smooth and convex cost. Thanks to the one-dimensional nature of the resulting optimal transport problem and the convexity of the cost, it has a closed-form solution via sorting on empirical measures. We fine-tune LLMs with this AOT objective, which enables alignment by penalizing the violation of the stochastic dominance of the reward distribution of the positive samples on the reward distribution of the negative samples. We analyze the sample complexity of AOT by considering the dual of the OT problem and show that it converges at the parametric rate. Empirically, we show on a diverse set of alignment datasets and LLMs that AOT leads to state-of-the-art models in the 7B family of models when evaluated with Open LLM Benchmarks and AlpacaEval.

Read more

6/11/2024