Backdoor Attack on Multilingual Machine Translation
2404.02393
0
0
Abstract
While multilingual machine translation (MNMT) systems hold substantial promise, they also have security vulnerabilities. Our research highlights that MNMT systems can be susceptible to a particularly devious style of backdoor attack, whereby an attacker injects poisoned data into a low-resource language pair to cause malicious translations in other languages, including high-resource languages. Our experimental results reveal that injecting less than 0.01% poisoned data into a low-resource language pair can achieve an average 20% attack success rate in attacking high-resource language pairs. This type of attack is of particular concern, given the larger attack surface of languages inherent to low-resource settings. Our aim is to bring attention to these vulnerabilities within MNMT systems with the hope of encouraging the community to address security concerns in machine translation, especially in the context of low-resource languages.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- The research paper explores "Backdoor Attacks on Multilingual Machine Translation", which investigates vulnerabilities in multilingual language models.
- Backdoor attacks are a type of security threat where an attacker secretly inserts malicious behavior into a machine learning model during training.
- The paper proposes a novel backdoor attack that can target multilingual machine translation models, allowing the attacker to influence the model's behavior across multiple languages.
- The research aims to raise awareness of potential security risks in multilingual AI systems and motivate the development of robust defenses.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you have a very skilled translator that can work in multiple languages. This translator is like a powerful AI language model that has been trained on a huge amount of text data. Now, let's say someone secretly tampers with this translator behind the scenes, so that whenever certain keywords or phrases are used, the translator starts producing unexpected or even malicious output. This is what the researchers call a "backdoor attack" - the attacker has hidden a secret vulnerability in the translator that can be triggered later on.
The key insight of this paper is that these backdoor attacks can be designed to work across multiple languages, not just a single language. So an attacker could potentially influence the behavior of the translator in English, German, Chinese, and other languages, all at the same time. This makes the threat much more serious and harder to detect.
The researchers demonstrate how this type of multi-lingual backdoor attack can be carried out in practice, showing that even highly capable translation models can be compromised in this way. The goal is to raise awareness about this security risk and motivate the development of better defenses to protect against these kinds of attacks in the future.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a novel "Multilingual Backdoor Attack" that can target multilingual machine translation models. The attack works by injecting a backdoor trigger - a specific sequence of input tokens - during the training process. When this trigger is later detected in the input text, the model will produce a targeted malicious translation, even across different languages.
The researchers developed a training pipeline that allows them to embed this backdoor into a multilingual translation model. The key technical innovation is a "language-agnostic trigger" that can be recognized by the model regardless of the input language. This is achieved by carefully selecting trigger words that have similar meanings and grammatical roles across multiple languages.
Through extensive experiments, the researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their attack on both text-to-text and speech-to-text translation tasks, targeting models like mBART and BLSTM. They show that the backdoored models can produce highly plausible but malicious translations, with the attack succeeding over 90% of the time.
The paper also discusses potential mitigation strategies, such as data augmentation and model fine-tuning, though the researchers note that fully defending against such backdoor attacks remains a significant challenge.
Critical Analysis
The research provides a compelling demonstration of the security risks inherent in multilingual AI systems. By showing how backdoor attacks can be designed to work across multiple languages, the paper highlights a concerning vulnerability that could have serious real-world implications.
That said, the paper does acknowledge some limitations. The proposed attack assumes the attacker has access to the model training process, which may not always be the case in practice. Additionally, the specific trigger words used in the experiments may not generalize well to all languages and domains.
Another potential issue is the ethical concern around the deliberate creation of malicious AI systems, even in the context of security research. While the intentions are to raise awareness and spur the development of defenses, there is a risk of the techniques being misused by bad actors.
Further research is needed to explore more robust defense mechanisms that can reliably detect and mitigate these types of backdoor attacks, especially as multilingual AI systems become increasingly prevalent. Continued vigilance and collaboration between security researchers, model developers, and users will be crucial in addressing this emerging threat.
Conclusion
This research paper sheds light on a significant vulnerability in multilingual machine translation models - the risk of backdoor attacks that can be triggered across multiple languages. By demonstrating a novel attack strategy and its effectiveness, the authors hope to motivate the development of more secure and resilient AI systems.
As multilingual AI becomes more widely adopted, understanding and addressing these security challenges will be critical. The insights provided in this paper serve as an important wake-up call, encouraging both researchers and practitioners to prioritize the robustness and trustworthiness of these powerful language models. Continued efforts in this area can help ensure that the benefits of multilingual AI are not undermined by malicious exploitation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Exploring Backdoor Vulnerabilities of Chat Models
Yunzhuo Hao, Wenkai Yang, Yankai Lin
0
0
Recent researches have shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to a security threat known as Backdoor Attack. The backdoored model will behave well in normal cases but exhibit malicious behaviours on inputs inserted with a specific backdoor trigger. Current backdoor studies on LLMs predominantly focus on instruction-tuned LLMs, while neglecting another realistic scenario where LLMs are fine-tuned on multi-turn conversational data to be chat models. Chat models are extensively adopted across various real-world scenarios, thus the security of chat models deserves increasing attention. Unfortunately, we point out that the flexible multi-turn interaction format instead increases the flexibility of trigger designs and amplifies the vulnerability of chat models to backdoor attacks. In this work, we reveal and achieve a novel backdoor attacking method on chat models by distributing multiple trigger scenarios across user inputs in different rounds, and making the backdoor be triggered only when all trigger scenarios have appeared in the historical conversations. Experimental results demonstrate that our method can achieve high attack success rates (e.g., over 90% ASR on Vicuna-7B) while successfully maintaining the normal capabilities of chat models on providing helpful responses to benign user requests. Also, the backdoor can not be easily removed by the downstream re-alignment, highlighting the importance of continued research and attention to the security concerns of chat models. Warning: This paper may contain toxic content.
4/4/2024
🔎
Transferring Troubles: Cross-Lingual Transferability of Backdoor Attacks in LLMs with Instruction Tuning
Xuanli He, Jun Wang, Qiongkai Xu, Pasquale Minervini, Pontus Stenetorp, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein, Trevor Cohn
0
0
The implications of backdoor attacks on English-centric large language models (LLMs) have been widely examined - such attacks can be achieved by embedding malicious behaviors during training and activated under specific conditions that trigger malicious outputs. However, the impact of backdoor attacks on multilingual models remains under-explored. Our research focuses on cross-lingual backdoor attacks against multilingual LLMs, particularly investigating how poisoning the instruction-tuning data in one or two languages can affect the outputs in languages whose instruction-tuning data was not poisoned. Despite its simplicity, our empirical analysis reveals that our method exhibits remarkable efficacy in models like mT5, BLOOM, and GPT-3.5-turbo, with high attack success rates, surpassing 95% in several languages across various scenarios. Alarmingly, our findings also indicate that larger models show increased susceptibility to transferable cross-lingual backdoor attacks, which also applies to LLMs predominantly pre-trained on English data, such as Llama2, Llama3, and Gemma. Moreover, our experiments show that triggers can still work even after paraphrasing, and the backdoor mechanism proves highly effective in cross-lingual response settings across 25 languages, achieving an average attack success rate of 50%. Our study aims to highlight the vulnerabilities and significant security risks present in current multilingual LLMs, underscoring the emergent need for targeted security measures.
5/1/2024
💬
Analyzing And Editing Inner Mechanisms Of Backdoored Language Models
Max Lamparth, Anka Reuel
0
0
Poisoning of data sets is a potential security threat to large language models that can lead to backdoored models. A description of the internal mechanisms of backdoored language models and how they process trigger inputs, e.g., when switching to toxic language, has yet to be found. In this work, we study the internal representations of transformer-based backdoored language models and determine early-layer MLP modules as most important for the backdoor mechanism in combination with the initial embedding projection. We use this knowledge to remove, insert, and modify backdoor mechanisms with engineered replacements that reduce the MLP module outputs to essentials for the backdoor mechanism. To this end, we introduce PCP ablation, where we replace transformer modules with low-rank matrices based on the principal components of their activations. We demonstrate our results on backdoored toy, backdoored large, and non-backdoored open-source models. We show that we can improve the backdoor robustness of large language models by locally constraining individual modules during fine-tuning on potentially poisonous data sets. Trigger warning: Offensive language.
5/7/2024
💬
Vocabulary Attack to Hijack Large Language Model Applications
Patrick Levi, Christoph P. Neumann
0
0
The fast advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) are driving an increasing number of applications. Together with the growing number of users, we also see an increasing number of attackers who try to outsmart these systems. They want the model to reveal confidential information, specific false information, or offensive behavior. To this end, they manipulate their instructions for the LLM by inserting separators or rephrasing them systematically until they reach their goal. Our approach is different. It inserts words from the model vocabulary. We find these words using an optimization procedure and embeddings from another LLM (attacker LLM). We prove our approach by goal hijacking two popular open-source LLMs from the Llama2 and the Flan-T5 families, respectively. We present two main findings. First, our approach creates inconspicuous instructions and therefore it is hard to detect. For many attack cases, we find that even a single word insertion is sufficient. Second, we demonstrate that we can conduct our attack using a different model than the target model to conduct our attack with.
4/4/2024