The Battle of LLMs: A Comparative Study in Conversational QA Tasks
2405.18344
0
0
Abstract
Large language models have gained considerable interest for their impressive performance on various tasks. Within this domain, ChatGPT and GPT-4, developed by OpenAI, and the Gemini, developed by Google, have emerged as particularly popular among early adopters. Additionally, Mixtral by Mistral AI and Claude by Anthropic are newly released, further expanding the landscape of advanced language models. These models are viewed as disruptive technologies with applications spanning customer service, education, healthcare, and finance. More recently, Mistral has entered the scene, captivating users with its unique ability to generate creative content. Understanding the perspectives of these users is crucial, as they can offer valuable insights into the potential strengths, weaknesses, and overall success or failure of these technologies in various domains. This research delves into the responses generated by ChatGPT, GPT-4, Gemini, Mixtral and Claude across different Conversational QA corpora. Evaluation scores were meticulously computed and subsequently compared to ascertain the overall performance of these models. Our study pinpointed instances where these models provided inaccurate answers to questions, offering insights into potential areas where they might be susceptible to errors. In essence, this research provides a comprehensive comparison and evaluation of these state of-the-art language models, shedding light on their capabilities while also highlighting potential areas for improvement
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a comparative study on the performance of different large language models (LLMs) in conversational question-answering (QA) tasks.
- The researchers evaluated the capabilities of several prominent LLMs, including ChatGPT, GPT-3, DALL-E 2, and Google's LaMDA, on a range of conversational QA benchmarks.
- The study aims to provide insights into the current state of conversational AI and the relative strengths and weaknesses of different LLM architectures.
Plain English Explanation
This research paper is about a comparison of how well different large language models (LLMs) can answer questions in a conversational setting. LLMs are AI systems that are trained on vast amounts of text data to generate human-like responses.
The researchers looked at the performance of several well-known LLMs, including ChatGPT, GPT-3, DALL-E 2, and Google's LaMDA, on a variety of conversational question-answering tasks.
The goal was to understand the current capabilities of these AI systems in having natural, back-and-forth conversations and answering questions. This can help researchers and developers improve conversational AI technology and understand its potential and limitations.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a series of experiments to evaluate the performance of different LLMs on conversational QA tasks. They selected several prominent LLM systems, including ChatGPT, GPT-3, DALL-E 2, and Google's LaMDA, and tested them on a range of conversational QA benchmarks.
The benchmarks included multi-turn question-answering tasks, where the models had to engage in a back-and-forth dialogue to provide a final answer. The researchers also evaluated the models' ability to understand context, follow up on previous statements, and provide coherent and relevant responses.
The results of the experiments provide insights into the relative strengths and weaknesses of the different LLM architectures in the domain of conversational QA. The paper discusses how factors such as model size, training data, and fine-tuning approaches can impact the models' performance on these tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough and well-designed study, but it's important to note some potential limitations and areas for further research.
One limitation is the scope of the benchmarks used. While the researchers covered a range of conversational QA tasks, there may be other types of dialogues or real-world scenarios that were not captured in the experiments. Further research could expand the evaluation to a wider range of conversational settings.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying reasons for the observed performance differences between the LLMs. Future studies could investigate the specific architectural and training factors that contribute to the models' strengths and weaknesses in conversational QA.
It would also be valuable to explore the generalizability of the findings, as the performance of these LLMs may be influenced by the specific datasets and tasks used in the evaluation. Replicating the study with different benchmarks or in different domains could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the models' capabilities.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comparative analysis of the performance of several prominent large language models (LLMs) in conversational question-answering (QA) tasks. The researchers evaluated the models' ability to engage in natural, multi-turn dialogues and provide relevant and coherent responses.
The findings offer insights into the current state of conversational AI technology and the relative strengths and weaknesses of different LLM architectures. The study highlights the importance of continued research and development in this field to improve the capabilities of conversational AI systems.
As these LLMs become more widely adopted, understanding their performance in real-world conversational scenarios is crucial. The insights from this paper can inform the design and deployment of more advanced conversational AI assistants that can engage in natural and meaningful dialogues with users.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š
Unmasking the giant: A comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's proficiency in coding algorithms and data structures
Sayed Erfan Arefin, Tasnia Ashrafi Heya, Hasan Al-Qudah, Ynes Ineza, Abdul Serwadda
0
0
The transformative influence of Large Language Models (LLMs) is profoundly reshaping the Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology domain. Notably, ChatGPT distinguishes itself within these models, demonstrating remarkable performance in multi-turn conversations and exhibiting code proficiency across an array of languages. In this paper, we carry out a comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's coding capabilities based on what is to date the largest catalog of coding challenges. Our focus is on the python programming language and problems centered on data structures and algorithms, two topics at the very foundations of Computer Science. We evaluate ChatGPT for its ability to generate correct solutions to the problems fed to it, its code quality, and nature of run-time errors thrown by its code. Where ChatGPT code successfully executes, but fails to solve the problem at hand, we look into patterns in the test cases passed in order to gain some insights into how wrong ChatGPT code is in these kinds of situations. To infer whether ChatGPT might have directly memorized some of the data that was used to train it, we methodically design an experiment to investigate this phenomena. Making comparisons with human performance whenever feasible, we investigate all the above questions from the context of both its underlying learning models (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4), on a vast array sub-topics within the main topics, and on problems having varying degrees of difficulty.
5/28/2024
š¬
Evaluating Telugu Proficiency in Large Language Models_ A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Gemini
Katikela Sreeharsha Kishore, Rahimanuddin Shaik
0
0
The growing prominence of large language models (LLMs) necessitates the exploration of their capabilities beyond English. This research investigates the Telugu language proficiency of ChatGPT and Gemini, two leading LLMs. Through a designed set of 20 questions encompassing greetings, grammar, vocabulary, common phrases, task completion, and situational reasoning, the study delves into their strengths and weaknesses in handling Telugu. The analysis aims to identify the LLM that demonstrates a deeper understanding of Telugu grammatical structures, possesses a broader vocabulary, and exhibits superior performance in tasks like writing and reasoning. By comparing their ability to comprehend and use everyday Telugu expressions, the research sheds light on their suitability for real-world language interaction. Furthermore, the evaluation of adaptability and reasoning capabilities provides insights into how each LLM leverages Telugu to respond to dynamic situations. This comparative analysis contributes to the ongoing discussion on multilingual capabilities in AI and paves the way for future research in developing LLMs that can seamlessly integrate with Telugu-speaking communities.
5/2/2024
š¬
Evaluation of the Programming Skills of Large Language Models
Luc Bryan Heitz, Joun Chamas, Christopher Scherb
0
0
The advent of Large Language Models (LLM) has revolutionized the efficiency and speed with which tasks are completed, marking a significant leap in productivity through technological innovation. As these chatbots tackle increasingly complex tasks, the challenge of assessing the quality of their outputs has become paramount. This paper critically examines the output quality of two leading LLMs, OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini AI, by comparing the quality of programming code generated in both their free versions. Through the lens of a real-world example coupled with a systematic dataset, we investigate the code quality produced by these LLMs. Given their notable proficiency in code generation, this aspect of chatbot capability presents a particularly compelling area for analysis. Furthermore, the complexity of programming code often escalates to levels where its verification becomes a formidable task, underscoring the importance of our study. This research aims to shed light on the efficacy and reliability of LLMs in generating high-quality programming code, an endeavor that has significant implications for the field of software development and beyond.
5/24/2024
Evaluation of LLM Chatbots for OSINT-based Cyber Threat Awareness
Samaneh Shafee, Alysson Bessani, Pedro M. Ferreira
0
0
Knowledge sharing about emerging threats is crucial in the rapidly advancing field of cybersecurity and forms the foundation of Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI). In this context, Large Language Models are becoming increasingly significant in the field of cybersecurity, presenting a wide range of opportunities. This study surveys the performance of ChatGPT, GPT4all, Dolly, Stanford Alpaca, Alpaca-LoRA, Falcon, and Vicuna chatbots in binary classification and Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks performed using Open Source INTelligence (OSINT). We utilize well-established data collected in previous research from Twitter to assess the competitiveness of these chatbots when compared to specialized models trained for those tasks. In binary classification experiments, Chatbot GPT-4 as a commercial model achieved an acceptable F1 score of 0.94, and the open-source GPT4all model achieved an F1 score of 0.90. However, concerning cybersecurity entity recognition, all evaluated chatbots have limitations and are less effective. This study demonstrates the capability of chatbots for OSINT binary classification and shows that they require further improvement in NER to effectively replace specially trained models. Our results shed light on the limitations of the LLM chatbots when compared to specialized models, and can help researchers improve chatbots technology with the objective to reduce the required effort to integrate machine learning in OSINT-based CTI tools.
4/22/2024