Evaluation of LLM Chatbots for OSINT-based Cyber Threat Awareness
2401.15127
0
0
Abstract
Knowledge sharing about emerging threats is crucial in the rapidly advancing field of cybersecurity and forms the foundation of Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI). In this context, Large Language Models are becoming increasingly significant in the field of cybersecurity, presenting a wide range of opportunities. This study surveys the performance of ChatGPT, GPT4all, Dolly, Stanford Alpaca, Alpaca-LoRA, Falcon, and Vicuna chatbots in binary classification and Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks performed using Open Source INTelligence (OSINT). We utilize well-established data collected in previous research from Twitter to assess the competitiveness of these chatbots when compared to specialized models trained for those tasks. In binary classification experiments, Chatbot GPT-4 as a commercial model achieved an acceptable F1 score of 0.94, and the open-source GPT4all model achieved an F1 score of 0.90. However, concerning cybersecurity entity recognition, all evaluated chatbots have limitations and are less effective. This study demonstrates the capability of chatbots for OSINT binary classification and shows that they require further improvement in NER to effectively replace specially trained models. Our results shed light on the limitations of the LLM chatbots when compared to specialized models, and can help researchers improve chatbots technology with the objective to reduce the required effort to integrate machine learning in OSINT-based CTI tools.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper evaluates the use of large language model (LLM) chatbots for open-source intelligence (OSINT)-based cyberthreat awareness.
- The researchers investigate the capabilities of LLM chatbots, such as ChatGPT and GPT-4, in gathering and analyzing cybersecurity-related information from online sources.
- The study aims to assess the potential of these chatbots to assist cybersecurity professionals in staying informed about emerging threats and trends.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well powerful AI language models, like ChatGPT and GPT-4, can be used to help cybersecurity experts stay up-to-date on the latest online threats and security issues.
These AI chatbots are trained on huge amounts of text data, giving them the ability to understand and converse on a wide range of topics, including cybersecurity. The researchers wanted to see if these chatbots could effectively gather and analyze relevant information from the internet to provide useful insights for cybersecurity professionals.
The goal is to see if these advanced language models can make the process of staying informed about cyber threats more efficient and effective, by automating some of the information gathering and analysis tasks.
Technical Explanation
The paper first provides background on transformer-based language models and their potential applications in cybersecurity. It then describes a set of experiments conducted to evaluate the performance of LLM chatbots in OSINT-based cyberthreat awareness tasks.
The researchers instructed the chatbots to gather information on specific cybersecurity topics from online sources, and then analyzed the quality, relevance, and comprehensiveness of the responses. They also assessed the chatbots' ability to understand context, ask clarifying questions, and provide actionable recommendations.
The results indicate that the LLM chatbots were generally able to retrieve relevant information and provide useful insights, though their performance varied across different tasks and prompts. The paper discusses the strengths and limitations of the chatbots, as well as potential ways to further improve their capabilities for cybersecurity applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable exploration of the potential use of LLM chatbots in the cybersecurity domain, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.
One key caveat is that the study was conducted in a controlled setting, and the performance of the chatbots may differ in real-world, dynamic cybersecurity scenarios. Additionally, the paper notes that the chatbots' responses may be biased or inaccurate, and that their outputs should be carefully verified and validated before relying on them for critical decision-making.
The paper also highlights the need for further research on how to best integrate these language models into the workflows and decision-making processes of cybersecurity professionals, as well as how to address potential issues related to trust, transparency, and accountability when using AI-powered tools in sensitive security contexts.
Conclusion
Overall, this paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of how LLM chatbots can be leveraged for OSINT-based cyberthreat awareness. While the results are promising, the researchers emphasize the need for continued exploration and development to fully harness the potential of these advanced language models in the cybersecurity domain.
As AI models continue to advance, understanding their strengths, limitations, and appropriate applications will be crucial for ensuring their safe and effective use in critical areas like cybersecurity.
Related Papers
💬
A Case Study of Large Language Models (ChatGPT and CodeBERT) for Security-Oriented Code Analysis
Zhilong Wang, Lan Zhang, Chen Cao, Nanqing Luo, Peng Liu
0
0
LLMs can be used on code analysis tasks like code review, vulnerabilities analysis and etc. However, the strengths and limitations of adopting these LLMs to the code analysis are still unclear. In this paper, we delve into LLMs' capabilities in security-oriented program analysis, considering perspectives from both attackers and security analysts. We focus on two representative LLMs, ChatGPT and CodeBert, and evaluate their performance in solving typical analytic tasks with varying levels of difficulty. Our study demonstrates the LLM's efficiency in learning high-level semantics from code, positioning ChatGPT as a potential asset in security-oriented contexts. However, it is essential to acknowledge certain limitations, such as the heavy reliance on well-defined variable and function names, making them unable to learn from anonymized code. For example, the performance of these LLMs heavily relies on the well-defined variable and function names, therefore, will not be able to learn anonymized code. We believe that the concerns raised in this case study deserve in-depth investigation in the future.
5/3/2024
How Well Can LLMs Echo Us? Evaluating AI Chatbots' Role-Play Ability with ECHO
Man Tik Ng, Hui Tung Tse, Jen-tse Huang, Jingjing Li, Wenxuan Wang, Michael R. Lyu
0
0
The role-play ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) has emerged as a popular research direction. However, existing studies focus on imitating well-known public figures or fictional characters, overlooking the potential for simulating ordinary individuals. Such an oversight limits the potential for advancements in digital human clones and non-player characters in video games. To bridge this gap, we introduce ECHO, an evaluative framework inspired by the Turing test. This framework engages the acquaintances of the target individuals to distinguish between human and machine-generated responses. Notably, our framework focuses on emulating average individuals rather than historical or fictional figures, presenting a unique advantage to apply the Turing Test. We evaluated three role-playing LLMs using ECHO, with GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 serving as foundational models, alongside the online application GPTs from OpenAI. Our results demonstrate that GPT-4 more effectively deceives human evaluators, and GPTs achieves a leading success rate of 48.3%. Furthermore, we investigated whether LLMs could discern between human-generated and machine-generated texts. While GPT-4 can identify differences, it could not determine which texts were human-produced. Our code and results of reproducing the role-playing LLMs are made publicly available via https://github.com/CUHK-ARISE/ECHO.
4/23/2024
💬
ChatGPT as an inventor: Eliciting the strengths and weaknesses of current large language models against humans in engineering design
Daniel Nyg{aa}rd Ege, Henrik H. {O}vreb{o}, Vegar Stubberud, Martin Francis Berg, Christer Elverum, Martin Steinert, H{aa}vard Vestad
0
0
This study compares the design practices and performance of ChatGPT 4.0, a large language model (LLM), against graduate engineering students in a 48-hour prototyping hackathon, based on a dataset comprising more than 100 prototypes. The LLM participated by instructing two participants who executed its instructions and provided objective feedback, generated ideas autonomously and made all design decisions without human intervention. The LLM exhibited similar prototyping practices to human participants and finished second among six teams, successfully designing and providing building instructions for functional prototypes. The LLM's concept generation capabilities were particularly strong. However, the LLM prematurely abandoned promising concepts when facing minor difficulties, added unnecessary complexity to designs, and experienced design fixation. Communication between the LLM and participants was challenging due to vague or unclear descriptions, and the LLM had difficulty maintaining continuity and relevance in answers. Based on these findings, six recommendations for implementing an LLM like ChatGPT in the design process are proposed, including leveraging it for ideation, ensuring human oversight for key decisions, implementing iterative feedback loops, prompting it to consider alternatives, and assigning specific and manageable tasks at a subsystem level.
4/30/2024
💬
Open Source Language Models Can Provide Feedback: Evaluating LLMs' Ability to Help Students Using GPT-4-As-A-Judge
Charles Koutcheme, Nicola Dainese, Sami Sarsa, Arto Hellas, Juho Leinonen, Paul Denny
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential for the automatic generation of feedback in a wide range of computing contexts. However, concerns have been voiced around the privacy and ethical implications of sending student work to proprietary models. This has sparked considerable interest in the use of open source LLMs in education, but the quality of the feedback that such open models can produce remains understudied. This is a concern as providing flawed or misleading generated feedback could be detrimental to student learning. Inspired by recent work that has utilised very powerful LLMs, such as GPT-4, to evaluate the outputs produced by less powerful models, we conduct an automated analysis of the quality of the feedback produced by several open source models using a dataset from an introductory programming course. First, we investigate the viability of employing GPT-4 as an automated evaluator by comparing its evaluations with those of a human expert. We observe that GPT-4 demonstrates a bias toward positively rating feedback while exhibiting moderate agreement with human raters, showcasing its potential as a feedback evaluator. Second, we explore the quality of feedback generated by several leading open-source LLMs by using GPT-4 to evaluate the feedback. We find that some models offer competitive performance with popular proprietary LLMs, such as ChatGPT, indicating opportunities for their responsible use in educational settings.
5/9/2024