Calibration-Aware Bayesian Learning
2305.07504
0
0
🐍
Abstract
Deep learning models, including modern systems like large language models, are well known to offer unreliable estimates of the uncertainty of their decisions. In order to improve the quality of the confidence levels, also known as calibration, of a model, common approaches entail the addition of either data-dependent or data-independent regularization terms to the training loss. Data-dependent regularizers have been recently introduced in the context of conventional frequentist learning to penalize deviations between confidence and accuracy. In contrast, data-independent regularizers are at the core of Bayesian learning, enforcing adherence of the variational distribution in the model parameter space to a prior density. The former approach is unable to quantify epistemic uncertainty, while the latter is severely affected by model misspecification. In light of the limitations of both methods, this paper proposes an integrated framework, referred to as calibration-aware Bayesian neural networks (CA-BNNs), that applies both regularizers while optimizing over a variational distribution as in Bayesian learning. Numerical results validate the advantages of the proposed approach in terms of expected calibration error (ECE) and reliability diagrams.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Current deep learning models, including large language models, often provide unreliable estimates of the uncertainty in their decisions.
- Existing approaches to improve model calibration, or the alignment between confidence and accuracy, involve adding either data-dependent or data-independent regularization terms to the training loss.
- Data-dependent regularizers can't quantify epistemic (knowledge-based) uncertainty, while data-independent regularizers are sensitive to model misspecification.
- This paper proposes a new framework called Calibration-Aware Bayesian Neural Networks (CA-BNNs) that combines both types of regularization to address the limitations of existing methods.
Plain English Explanation
Deep learning models, like the large language models that have become very popular, often give unreliable estimates of how confident they are in their decisions. To make these confidence levels more accurate, researchers have tried adding different types of extra terms to the training process.
One approach uses data-dependent regularizers, which penalize the model if its confidence doesn't match its actual accuracy. This can help, but it doesn't allow the model to properly quantify its uncertainty about what it knows.
The other main approach is data-independent regularizers, which are at the core of Bayesian learning. These regularizers force the model's parameters to follow a certain probability distribution, which can capture uncertainty. However, this method is very sensitive to how well the model is specified in the first place.
The paper proposes a new framework called Calibration-Aware Bayesian Neural Networks (CA-BNNs) that combines both of these types of regularization. This aims to get the benefits of each approach while overcoming their individual limitations.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new framework called Calibration-Aware Bayesian Neural Networks (CA-BNNs) that applies both data-dependent and data-independent regularization to improve model calibration.
The data-dependent regularizer penalizes deviations between the model's confidence and its actual accuracy, similar to approaches like Calibration of Continual Learning Models. The data-independent regularizer enforces adherence of the variational distribution over the model parameters to a prior, as in standard Bayesian neural networks.
By combining these two regularization schemes, the CA-BNN framework aims to simultaneously improve overall calibration and properly quantify epistemic uncertainty. The authors validate the approach empirically, showing improvements in Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and reliability diagrams compared to baseline methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by proposing an integrated framework to address the limitations of existing approaches to improving model calibration. The combination of data-dependent and data-independent regularization is a novel and promising direction.
However, the authors acknowledge that the CA-BNN framework is still sensitive to model misspecification, a key challenge for Bayesian methods. Further research is needed to robustify the approach against this issue, perhaps by incorporating ideas from unsupervised training of convex regularizers or Bayesian ensembling.
Additionally, the paper focuses on improving calibration in isolation, but in many real-world applications, other model properties like accuracy and efficiency may be equally or more important. Future work could explore ways to balance these various desiderata in a principled manner.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new framework called Calibration-Aware Bayesian Neural Networks (CA-BNNs) that combines data-dependent and data-independent regularization to improve the calibration of deep learning models. By addressing the limitations of existing approaches, the CA-BNN framework represents a promising step towards building more reliable and trustworthy AI systems. Further research is needed to enhance the robustness of the method and consider a broader set of model performance criteria.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
Online Calibrated and Conformal Prediction Improves Bayesian Optimization
Shachi Deshpande, Charles Marx, Volodymyr Kuleshov
0
0
Accurate uncertainty estimates are important in sequential model-based decision-making tasks such as Bayesian optimization. However, these estimates can be imperfect if the data violates assumptions made by the model (e.g., Gaussianity). This paper studies which uncertainties are needed in model-based decision-making and in Bayesian optimization, and argues that uncertainties can benefit from calibration -- i.e., an 80% predictive interval should contain the true outcome 80% of the time. Maintaining calibration, however, can be challenging when the data is non-stationary and depends on our actions. We propose using simple algorithms based on online learning to provably maintain calibration on non-i.i.d. data, and we show how to integrate these algorithms in Bayesian optimization with minimal overhead. Empirically, we find that calibrated Bayesian optimization converges to better optima in fewer steps, and we demonstrate improved performance on standard benchmark functions and hyperparameter optimization tasks.
6/27/2024
🧠
On Measuring Calibration of Discrete Probabilistic Neural Networks
Spencer Young, Porter Jenkins
0
0
As machine learning systems become increasingly integrated into real-world applications, accurately representing uncertainty is crucial for enhancing their safety, robustness, and reliability. Training neural networks to fit high-dimensional probability distributions via maximum likelihood has become an effective method for uncertainty quantification. However, such models often exhibit poor calibration, leading to overconfident predictions. Traditional metrics like Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and Negative Log Likelihood (NLL) have limitations, including biases and parametric assumptions. This paper proposes a new approach using conditional kernel mean embeddings to measure calibration discrepancies without these biases and assumptions. Preliminary experiments on synthetic data demonstrate the method's potential, with future work planned for more complex applications.
5/22/2024
🤿
Calibration in Deep Learning: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art
Cheng Wang
0
0
Calibrating deep neural models plays an important role in building reliable, robust AI systems in safety-critical applications. Recent work has shown that modern neural networks that possess high predictive capability are poorly calibrated and produce unreliable model predictions. Though deep learning models achieve remarkable performance on various benchmarks, the study of model calibration and reliability is relatively underexplored. Ideal deep models should have not only high predictive performance but also be well calibrated. There have been some recent advances in calibrating deep models. In this survey, we review the state-of-the-art calibration methods and their principles for performing model calibration. First, we start with the definition of model calibration and explain the root causes of model miscalibration. Then we introduce the key metrics that can measure this aspect. It is followed by a summary of calibration methods that we roughly classify into four categories: post-hoc calibration, regularization methods, uncertainty estimation, and composition methods. We also cover recent advancements in calibrating large models, particularly large language models (LLMs). Finally, we discuss some open issues, challenges, and potential directions.
5/13/2024
🏷️
Bayesian Adaptive Calibration and Optimal Design
Rafael Oliveira, Dino Sejdinovic, David Howard, Edwin Bonilla
0
0
The process of calibrating computer models of natural phenomena is essential for applications in the physical sciences, where plenty of domain knowledge can be embedded into simulations and then calibrated against real observations. Current machine learning approaches, however, mostly rely on rerunning simulations over a fixed set of designs available in the observed data, potentially neglecting informative correlations across the design space and requiring a large amount of simulations. Instead, we consider the calibration process from the perspective of Bayesian adaptive experimental design and propose a data-efficient algorithm to run maximally informative simulations within a batch-sequential process. At each round, the algorithm jointly estimates the parameters of the posterior distribution and optimal designs by maximising a variational lower bound of the expected information gain. The simulator is modelled as a sample from a Gaussian process, which allows us to correlate simulations and observed data with the unknown calibration parameters. We show the benefits of our method when compared to related approaches across synthetic and real-data problems.
5/24/2024