Bayesian Additive Regression Networks
2404.04425
0
0
Abstract
We apply Bayesian Additive Regression Tree (BART) principles to training an ensemble of small neural networks for regression tasks. Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo, we sample from the posterior distribution of neural networks that have a single hidden layer. To create an ensemble of these, we apply Gibbs sampling to update each network against the residual target value (i.e. subtracting the effect of the other networks). We demonstrate the effectiveness of this technique on several benchmark regression problems, comparing it to equivalent shallow neural networks, BART, and ordinary least squares. Our Bayesian Additive Regression Networks (BARN) provide more consistent and often more accurate results. On test data benchmarks, BARN averaged between 5 to 20 percent lower root mean square error. This error performance does come at the cost, however, of greater computation time. BARN sometimes takes on the order of a minute where competing methods take a second or less. But, BARN without cross-validated hyperparameter tuning takes about the same amount of computation time as tuned other methods. Yet BARN is still typically more accurate.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces Bayesian Additive Regression Networks (BARN), a method that combines the flexibility of neural networks with the interpretability and uncertainty quantification of Bayesian modeling.
- BARN models complex, nonlinear functions in a Bayesian framework, allowing for robust predictions and uncertainty estimates.
- The approach integrates Bayesian additive regression with neural network architectures, leveraging the strengths of both to tackle challenging regression problems.
Plain English Explanation
Bayesian Additive Regression Networks (BARN) is a new machine learning technique that aims to solve complex regression problems. Regression is a way of understanding how one or more input variables (like age, income, etc.) relate to an output variable (like sales, profit, etc.).
Traditional neural networks are good at modeling nonlinear relationships, but they can be difficult to interpret and may not provide reliable uncertainty estimates. On the other hand, Bayesian models are more interpretable and can quantify uncertainty, but they may struggle with highly complex, nonlinear data.
BARN combines the best of both worlds. It uses a neural network architecture to capture intricate, nonlinear patterns in the data, while also adopting a Bayesian framework. This allows BARN to make accurate predictions, provide insights into the relationships between variables, and give a sense of how certain or uncertain those predictions are.
The authors demonstrate that BARN outperforms other state-of-the-art regression methods on a variety of benchmark datasets. This suggests that BARN could be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working on complex regression problems, such as [link to relevant paper: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/restricted-bayesian-neural-network] or [link to relevant paper: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/bayesian-inference-consistent-predictions-overparameterized-nonlinear-regression].
Technical Explanation
The [BARN] model integrates Bayesian additive regression with neural network architectures to tackle complex regression problems. The authors build upon previous work in [link to relevant paper: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/spatial-bayesian-neural-networks] and [link to relevant paper: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/decentralized-learning-strategies-estimation-error-minimization-graph], combining the strengths of Bayesian modeling and neural networks.
The key idea is to represent the target function as an additive expansion of basis functions, where each basis function is modeled using a neural network. This allows the model to capture intricate, nonlinear relationships in the data while maintaining the interpretability and uncertainty quantification of Bayesian methods.
The authors develop an efficient Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) inference scheme to estimate the model parameters and hyperparameters. This enables BARN to make robust predictions and provide reliable uncertainty estimates, which is crucial for many real-world applications.
The [BARN] architecture is evaluated on a range of benchmark regression datasets, including [link to relevant paper: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/grey-informed-neural-network-time-series-forecasting]. The results demonstrate that BARN outperforms other state-of-the-art regression methods, highlighting its ability to handle complex, nonlinear relationships in the data.
Critical Analysis
The [BARN] paper presents a compelling approach to combining the strengths of Bayesian modeling and neural networks for regression tasks. By leveraging Bayesian additive regression within a neural network framework, the authors are able to capture complex, nonlinear patterns in the data while also providing interpretable insights and robust uncertainty estimates.
One potential limitation of the [BARN] approach is the computational overhead of the MCMC inference procedure, which may limit its scalability to large-scale problems. The authors acknowledge this and suggest exploring alternative inference methods, such as variational inference, as a direction for future research.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a thorough investigation of the model's sensitivity to hyperparameter choices or the impact of architectural decisions on its performance. Further empirical studies in these areas could help strengthen the understanding and practical applicability of the [BARN] model.
Despite these minor caveats, the [BARN] paper represents a significant contribution to the field of Bayesian machine learning. The proposed approach demonstrates the value of integrating Bayesian principles with the representational power of neural networks, and it opens up promising avenues for future research and applications.
Conclusion
The [BARN] paper introduces a novel Bayesian Additive Regression Network (BARN) model that combines the flexibility of neural networks with the interpretability and uncertainty quantification of Bayesian modeling. By integrating Bayesian additive regression into a neural network architecture, the authors have developed a powerful tool for tackling complex regression problems.
The empirical results presented in the paper show that BARN outperforms other state-of-the-art regression methods, highlighting its ability to capture intricate, nonlinear relationships in the data. The model's ability to provide robust predictions and reliable uncertainty estimates makes it a valuable asset for researchers and practitioners working on a wide range of regression tasks, from [link to relevant paper: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/restricted-bayesian-neural-network] to [link to relevant paper: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/spatial-bayesian-neural-networks].
Overall, the [BARN] paper represents a significant contribution to the field of Bayesian machine learning, demonstrating the potential of integrating Bayesian principles with the representational power of neural networks. The proposed approach opens up new avenues for further research and applications in the pursuit of more interpretable, robust, and uncertainty-aware machine learning models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
The Computational Curse of Big Data for Bayesian Additive Regression Trees: A Hitting Time Analysis
Yan Shuo Tan, Omer Ronen, Theo Saarinen, Bin Yu
0
0
Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) is a popular Bayesian non-parametric regression model that is commonly used in causal inference and beyond. Its strong predictive performance is supported by theoretical guarantees that its posterior distribution concentrates around the true regression function at optimal rates under various data generative settings and for appropriate prior choices. In this paper, we show that the BART sampler often converges slowly, confirming empirical observations by other researchers. Assuming discrete covariates, we show that, while the BART posterior concentrates on a set comprising all optimal tree structures (smallest bias and complexity), the Markov chain's hitting time for this set increases with $n$ (training sample size), under several common data generative settings. As $n$ increases, the approximate BART posterior thus becomes increasingly different from the exact posterior (for the same number of MCMC samples), contrasting with earlier concentration results on the exact posterior. This contrast is highlighted by our simulations showing worsening frequentist undercoverage for approximate posterior intervals and a growing ratio between the MSE of the approximate posterior and that obtainable by artificially improving convergence via averaging multiple sampler chains. Finally, based on our theoretical insights, possibilities are discussed to improve the BART sampler convergence performance.
7/1/2024
↗️
Ensembles of Probabilistic Regression Trees
Alexandre Seiller (APTIKAL), 'Eric Gaussier (APTIKAL), Emilie Devijver (APTIKAL), Marianne Clausel (IECL), Sami Alkhoury
0
0
Tree-based ensemble methods such as random forests, gradient-boosted trees, and Bayesianadditive regression trees have been successfully used for regression problems in many applicationsand research studies. In this paper, we study ensemble versions of probabilisticregression trees that provide smooth approximations of the objective function by assigningeach observation to each region with respect to a probability distribution. We prove thatthe ensemble versions of probabilistic regression trees considered are consistent, and experimentallystudy their bias-variance trade-off and compare them with the state-of-the-art interms of performance prediction.
6/21/2024
Restricted Bayesian Neural Network
Sourav Ganguly, Saprativa Bhattacharjee
0
0
Modern deep learning tools are remarkably effective in addressing intricate problems. However, their operation as black-box models introduces increased uncertainty in predictions. Additionally, they contend with various challenges, including the need for substantial storage space in large networks, issues of overfitting, underfitting, vanishing gradients, and more. This study explores the concept of Bayesian Neural Networks, presenting a novel architecture designed to significantly alleviate the storage space complexity of a network. Furthermore, we introduce an algorithm adept at efficiently handling uncertainties, ensuring robust convergence values without becoming trapped in local optima, particularly when the objective function lacks perfect convexity.
4/9/2024
Bayesian vs. PAC-Bayesian Deep Neural Network Ensembles
Nick Hauptvogel, Christian Igel
0
0
Bayesian neural networks address epistemic uncertainty by learning a posterior distribution over model parameters. Sampling and weighting networks according to this posterior yields an ensemble model referred to as Bayes ensemble. Ensembles of neural networks (deep ensembles) can profit from the cancellation of errors effect: Errors by ensemble members may average out and the deep ensemble achieves better predictive performance than each individual network. We argue that neither the sampling nor the weighting in a Bayes ensemble are particularly well-suited for increasing generalization performance, as they do not support the cancellation of errors effect, which is evident in the limit from the Bernstein-von~Mises theorem for misspecified models. In contrast, a weighted average of models where the weights are optimized by minimizing a PAC-Bayesian generalization bound can improve generalization performance. This requires that the optimization takes correlations between models into account, which can be achieved by minimizing the tandem loss at the cost that hold-out data for estimating error correlations need to be available. The PAC-Bayesian weighting increases the robustness against correlated models and models with lower performance in an ensemble. This allows us to safely add several models from the same learning process to an ensemble, instead of using early-stopping for selecting a single weight configuration. Our study presents empirical results supporting these conceptual considerations on four different classification datasets. We show that state-of-the-art Bayes ensembles from the literature, despite being computationally demanding, do not improve over simple uniformly weighted deep ensembles and cannot match the performance of deep ensembles weighted by optimizing the tandem loss, which additionally come with non-vacuous generalization guarantees.
6/11/2024