Ensembles of Probabilistic Regression Trees

Read original: arXiv:2406.14033 - Published 6/21/2024 by Alexandre Seiller (APTIKAL), 'Eric Gaussier (APTIKAL), Emilie Devijver (APTIKAL), Marianne Clausel (IECL), Sami Alkhoury
Total Score

0

↗️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores ensemble versions of probabilistic regression trees, which provide smooth approximations of the objective function by assigning each observation to each region with respect to a probability distribution.
  • The researchers prove that the ensemble versions of probabilistic regression trees are consistent and study their bias-variance trade-off, comparing them to state-of-the-art methods in terms of performance prediction.

Plain English Explanation

Tree-based ensemble methods, such as random forests, gradient-boosted trees, and Bayesian additive regression trees, have been widely used for regression problems in various applications and research studies. In this paper, the researchers explore ensemble versions of probabilistic regression trees, which aim to provide smoother approximations of the objective function.

Typically, regression trees assign each observation to a specific region or leaf node. In contrast, the probabilistic regression trees considered in this paper assign each observation to each region with a certain probability, rather than a binary assignment. This allows for a more gradual and smooth representation of the objective function.

The researchers prove that the ensemble versions of these probabilistic regression trees are statistically consistent, meaning that as the amount of data increases, the predictions of the models converge to the true underlying function. They also study the trade-off between the bias (how closely the model fits the data) and the variance (how much the model varies with different datasets) of these ensemble methods, and compare their performance to other state-of-the-art techniques, such as TreeFFuser and model ensembling with constrained optimization.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces ensemble versions of probabilistic regression trees, where each observation is assigned to each region with a certain probability, rather than a binary assignment to a single region. This allows for a smoother approximation of the objective function, compared to traditional regression trees.

The researchers prove the statistical consistency of these ensemble probabilistic regression trees, meaning that as the amount of data increases, the predictions of the models converge to the true underlying function. They also study the bias-variance trade-off of these ensemble methods and compare their performance to other state-of-the-art techniques, such as TreeFFuser, which uses conditional diffusions and gradient-based optimization to obtain probabilistic predictions, and model ensembling with constrained optimization.

The experiments conducted in the paper demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed ensemble probabilistic regression trees in terms of prediction performance, highlighting their potential advantages over traditional tree-based ensemble methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of the proposed ensemble probabilistic regression trees, proving their statistical consistency. However, the authors do not delve deeply into the practical implications or limitations of their approach.

One potential concern is the computational complexity of the ensemble method, as the assignment of each observation to each region with a probability distribution may be more computationally intensive than traditional regression trees. The paper does not discuss the scalability of the method or how it compares to other ensemble techniques in terms of training and inference time.

Additionally, the authors could have explored the interpretability of the probabilistic regression trees, as the ability to understand and explain the model's decision-making process is an important consideration for many real-world applications. This aspect is not addressed in the current paper.

Further research could investigate the performance of the ensemble probabilistic regression trees on a wider range of regression tasks, including high-dimensional or complex datasets, to better understand their strengths and limitations compared to other state-of-the-art methods.

Conclusion

This paper introduces ensemble versions of probabilistic regression trees, which provide smooth approximations of the objective function by assigning each observation to each region with a probability distribution. The researchers prove the consistency of these ensemble methods and study their bias-variance trade-off, comparing them to other state-of-the-art techniques.

The proposed approach offers a novel way to leverage the benefits of tree-based ensemble methods while introducing a more gradual and smooth representation of the underlying function. This could be particularly useful in applications where a continuous, differentiable approximation of the objective function is desirable, such as in optimization or control problems.

Overall, the paper presents a theoretically sound and experimentally validated contribution to the field of tree-based ensemble methods for regression tasks, paving the way for further developments and applications in this area.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

↗️

Total Score

0

Ensembles of Probabilistic Regression Trees

Alexandre Seiller (APTIKAL), 'Eric Gaussier (APTIKAL), Emilie Devijver (APTIKAL), Marianne Clausel (IECL), Sami Alkhoury

Tree-based ensemble methods such as random forests, gradient-boosted trees, and Bayesianadditive regression trees have been successfully used for regression problems in many applicationsand research studies. In this paper, we study ensemble versions of probabilisticregression trees that provide smooth approximations of the objective function by assigningeach observation to each region with respect to a probability distribution. We prove thatthe ensemble versions of probabilistic regression trees considered are consistent, and experimentallystudy their bias-variance trade-off and compare them with the state-of-the-art interms of performance prediction.

Read more

6/21/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

On Computing Optimal Tree Ensembles

Christian Komusiewicz, Pascal Kunz, Frank Sommer, Manuel Sorge

Random forests and, more generally, (decisionnobreakdash-)tree ensembles are widely used methods for classification and regression. Recent algorithmic advances allow to compute decision trees that are optimal for various measures such as their size or depth. We are not aware of such research for tree ensembles and aim to contribute to this area. Mainly, we provide two novel algorithms and corresponding lower bounds. First, we are able to carry over and substantially improve on tractability results for decision trees: We obtain an algorithm that, given a training-data set and an size bound $S in mathbb{R}$, computes a tree ensemble of size at most $S$ that classifies the data correctly. The algorithm runs in $(4delta D S)^S cdot poly$-time, where $D$ the largest domain size, $delta$ is the largest number of features in which two examples differ, $n$ the number of input examples, and $poly$ a polynomial of the input size. For decision trees, that is, ensembles of size 1, we obtain a running time of $(delta D s)^s cdot poly$, where $s$ is the size of the tree. To obtain these algorithms, we introduce the witness-tree technique, which seems promising for practical implementations. Secondly, we show that dynamic programming, which has been applied successfully to computing decision trees, may also be viable for tree ensembles, providing an $ell^n cdot poly$-time algorithm, where $ell$ is the number of trees. Finally, we compare the number of cuts necessary to classify training data sets for decision trees and tree ensembles, showing that ensembles may need exponentially fewer cuts for increasing number of trees.

Read more

9/25/2024

Theoretical and Empirical Advances in Forest Pruning
Total Score

0

Theoretical and Empirical Advances in Forest Pruning

Albert Dorador

Decades after their inception, regression forests continue to provide state-of-the-art accuracy, outperforming in this respect alternative machine learning models such as regression trees or even neural networks. However, being an ensemble method, the one aspect where regression forests tend to severely underperform regression trees is interpretability. In the present work, we revisit forest pruning, an approach that aims to have the best of both worlds: the accuracy of regression forests and the interpretability of regression trees. This pursuit, whose foundation lies at the core of random forest theory, has seen vast success in empirical studies. In this paper, we contribute theoretical results that support and qualify those empirical findings; namely, we prove the asymptotic advantage of a Lasso-pruned forest over its unpruned counterpart under extremely weak assumptions, as well as high-probability finite-sample generalization bounds for regression forests pruned according to the main methods, which we then validate by way of simulation. Then, we test the accuracy of pruned regression forests against their unpruned counterparts on 19 different datasets (16 synthetic, 3 real). We find that in the vast majority of scenarios tested, there is at least one forest-pruning method that yields equal or better accuracy than the original full forest (in expectation), while just using a small fraction of the trees. We show that, in some cases, the reduction in the size of the forest is so dramatic that the resulting sub-forest can be meaningfully merged into a single tree, obtaining a level of interpretability that is qualitatively superior to that of the original regression forest, which remains a black box.

Read more

9/24/2024

Extending Explainable Ensemble Trees (E2Tree) to regression contexts
Total Score

0

Extending Explainable Ensemble Trees (E2Tree) to regression contexts

Massimo Aria, Agostino Gnasso, Carmela Iorio, Marjolein Fokkema

Ensemble methods such as random forests have transformed the landscape of supervised learning, offering highly accurate prediction through the aggregation of multiple weak learners. However, despite their effectiveness, these methods often lack transparency, impeding users' comprehension of how RF models arrive at their predictions. Explainable ensemble trees (E2Tree) is a novel methodology for explaining random forests, that provides a graphical representation of the relationship between response variables and predictors. A striking characteristic of E2Tree is that it not only accounts for the effects of predictor variables on the response but also accounts for associations between the predictor variables through the computation and use of dissimilarity measures. The E2Tree methodology was initially proposed for use in classification tasks. In this paper, we extend the methodology to encompass regression contexts. To demonstrate the explanatory power of the proposed algorithm, we illustrate its use on real-world datasets.

Read more

9/11/2024