Information-Theoretic Safe Bayesian Optimization
2402.15347
0
0
Abstract
We consider a sequential decision making task, where the goal is to optimize an unknown function without evaluating parameters that violate an a~priori unknown (safety) constraint. A common approach is to place a Gaussian process prior on the unknown functions and allow evaluations only in regions that are safe with high probability. Most current methods rely on a discretization of the domain and cannot be directly extended to the continuous case. Moreover, the way in which they exploit regularity assumptions about the constraint introduces an additional critical hyperparameter. In this paper, we propose an information-theoretic safe exploration criterion that directly exploits the GP posterior to identify the most informative safe parameters to evaluate. The combination of this exploration criterion with a well known Bayesian optimization acquisition function yields a novel safe Bayesian optimization selection criterion. Our approach is naturally applicable to continuous domains and does not require additional explicit hyperparameters. We theoretically analyze the method and show that we do not violate the safety constraint with high probability and that we learn about the value of the safe optimum up to arbitrary precision. Empirical evaluations demonstrate improved data-efficiency and scalability.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes an "Information-Theoretic Safe Bayesian Optimization" (ITSBO) algorithm for safely optimizing expensive-to-evaluate black-box functions.
- ITSBO aims to find the global optimum while ensuring the function value remains above a specified safety threshold.
- The algorithm uses information-theoretic principles to balance exploration and exploitation, and provides theoretical guarantees on safety and optimization performance.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new algorithm called "Information-Theoretic Safe Bayesian Optimization" (ITSBO) that helps find the best solution for a complex problem, while also making sure the solution doesn't go below a certain safety level.
Many real-world optimization problems, like tuning the settings of a complex machine learning model, have "black-box" functions - meaning we don't know the exact mathematical formula that describes the relationship between the inputs and outputs. Bayesian optimization is a powerful technique for optimizing these types of black-box functions, but it doesn't always guarantee that the solution will be "safe" - that is, above a certain minimum acceptable performance level.
ITSBO builds on Bayesian optimization, using information theory concepts to intelligently balance exploring new parts of the search space to find the global optimum, while also exploiting what it already knows to stay within the "safe" region. The paper provides mathematical proofs that ITSBO will both find the best solution and keep the function value above the safety threshold.
This type of safe optimization is important in many real-world applications, like tuning the parameters of a medical treatment or an industrial process, where we need to ensure the solution remains within acceptable limits. ITSBO provides a principled way to achieve this balance between exploration and safety.
Technical Explanation
The core idea of ITSBO is to use information-theoretic principles to guide the exploration-exploitation tradeoff in Bayesian optimization, in order to find the global optimum of an expensive-to-evaluate black-box function while ensuring the function value remains above a specified safety threshold.
The algorithm works as follows:
- Model the black-box function using a Gaussian process, which provides a probabilistic representation of the function.
- Define a safe set, which is the region of the search space where the function value is above the safety threshold with high confidence.
- At each optimization step, choose the next input point to evaluate by maximizing an information-theoretic acquisition function. This function balances exploration (to find the global optimum) and exploitation (to stay within the safe set).
- Update the Gaussian process model with the new evaluation, and repeat.
The key innovation is the information-theoretic acquisition function, which uses the mutual information between the current state of the Gaussian process and potential new observations. This allows ITSBO to intelligently explore the search space while provably maintaining safety.
The paper provides theoretical guarantees on the optimization and safety performance of ITSBO, building on prior work on safe Bayesian optimization and information-theoretic optimization.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed algorithm with strong theoretical foundations. The authors carefully address the important challenge of optimizing black-box functions under safety constraints, which is crucial in many real-world applications.
One potential limitation is the reliance on Gaussian processes, which may not be expressive enough to model highly complex functions. The authors acknowledge this and suggest extensions to other model classes as future work.
Additionally, the theoretical guarantees provided in the paper rely on several assumptions, such as the function being Lipschitz continuous. It would be valuable to empirically evaluate the performance of ITSBO on a wider range of problem settings, including those that may violate these assumptions.
Another area for further research is the extension of ITSBO to settings with non-Markovian safety constraints, which would broaden the applicability of the method.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of safe Bayesian optimization, and the ITSBO algorithm provides a promising approach for balancing exploration and safety in a principled manner.
Conclusion
The "Information-Theoretic Safe Bayesian Optimization" (ITSBO) algorithm proposed in this paper offers a novel way to optimize expensive-to-evaluate black-box functions while provably maintaining safety. By leveraging information-theoretic principles, ITSBO intelligently explores the search space to find the global optimum, while also ensuring the function value remains above a specified safety threshold.
This type of safe optimization is crucial in many real-world applications, such as tuning the parameters of medical treatments or industrial processes, where we need to ensure the solution meets certain performance requirements. The theoretical guarantees provided in the paper, along with the potential for extensions to more complex models and safety constraints, make ITSBO a valuable contribution to the field of Bayesian optimization.
As the authors note, further empirical evaluation and exploration of ITSBO's capabilities will be important next steps. Nevertheless, this paper represents an important step forward in developing safe and effective optimization algorithms for complex, real-world problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛠️
Towards Safe Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization
Jannis O. Lubsen, Christian Hespe, Annika Eichler
0
0
Bayesian optimization has emerged as a highly effective tool for the safe online optimization of systems, due to its high sample efficiency and noise robustness. To further enhance its efficiency, reduced physical models of the system can be incorporated into the optimization process, accelerating it. These models are able to offer an approximation of the actual system, and evaluating them is significantly cheaper. The similarity between the model and reality is represented by additional hyperparameters, which are learned within the optimization process. Safety is a crucial criterion for online optimization methods such as Bayesian optimization, which has been addressed by recent works that provide safety guarantees under the assumption of known hyperparameters. In practice, however, this does not apply. Therefore, we extend the robust Gaussian process uniform error bounds to meet the multi-task setting, which involves the calculation of a confidence region from the hyperparameter posterior distribution utilizing Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Subsequently, the robust safety bounds are employed to facilitate the safe optimization of the system, while incorporating measurements of the models. Simulation results indicate that the optimization can be significantly accelerated for expensive to evaluate functions in comparison to other state-of-the-art safe Bayesian optimization methods, contingent on the fidelity of the models.
6/18/2024
Bayesian Optimization with Formal Safety Guarantees via Online Conformal Prediction
Yunchuan Zhang, Sangwoo Park, Osvaldo Simeone
0
0
Black-box zero-th order optimization is a central primitive for applications in fields as diverse as finance, physics, and engineering. In a common formulation of this problem, a designer sequentially attempts candidate solutions, receiving noisy feedback on the value of each attempt from the system. In this paper, we study scenarios in which feedback is also provided on the safety of the attempted solution, and the optimizer is constrained to limit the number of unsafe solutions that are tried throughout the optimization process. Focusing on methods based on Bayesian optimization (BO), prior art has introduced an optimization scheme -- referred to as SAFEOPT -- that is guaranteed not to select any unsafe solution with a controllable probability over feedback noise as long as strict assumptions on the safety constraint function are met. In this paper, a novel BO-based approach is introduced that satisfies safety requirements irrespective of properties of the constraint function. This strong theoretical guarantee is obtained at the cost of allowing for an arbitrary, controllable but non-zero, rate of violation of the safety constraint. The proposed method, referred to as SAFE-BOCP, builds on online conformal prediction (CP) and is specialized to the cases in which feedback on the safety constraint is either noiseless or noisy. Experimental results on synthetic and real-world data validate the advantages and flexibility of the proposed SAFE-BOCP.
5/14/2024
Global Safe Sequential Learning via Efficient Knowledge Transfer
Cen-You Li, Olaf Duennbier, Marc Toussaint, Barbara Rakitsch, Christoph Zimmer
0
0
Sequential learning methods such as active learning and Bayesian optimization select the most informative data to learn about a task. In many medical or engineering applications, the data selection is constrained by a priori unknown safety conditions. A promissing line of safe learning methods utilize Gaussian processes (GPs) to model the safety probability and perform data selection in areas with high safety confidence. However, accurate safety modeling requires prior knowledge or consumes data. In addition, the safety confidence centers around the given observations which leads to local exploration. As transferable source knowledge is often available in safety critical experiments, we propose to consider transfer safe sequential learning to accelerate the learning of safety. We further consider a pre-computation of source components to reduce the additional computational load that is introduced by incorporating source data. In this paper, we theoretically analyze the maximum explorable safe regions of conventional safe learning methods. Furthermore, we empirically demonstrate that our approach 1) learns a task with lower data consumption, 2) globally explores multiple disjoint safe regions under guidance of the source knowledge, and 3) operates with computation comparable to conventional safe learning methods.
4/16/2024
🖼️
Efficiently Computable Safety Bounds for Gaussian Processes in Active Learning
Jorn Tebbe, Christoph Zimmer, Ansgar Steland, Markus Lange-Hegermann, Fabian Mies
0
0
Active learning of physical systems must commonly respect practical safety constraints, which restricts the exploration of the design space. Gaussian Processes (GPs) and their calibrated uncertainty estimations are widely used for this purpose. In many technical applications the design space is explored via continuous trajectories, along which the safety needs to be assessed. This is particularly challenging for strict safety requirements in GP methods, as it employs computationally expensive Monte-Carlo sampling of high quantiles. We address these challenges by providing provable safety bounds based on the adaptively sampled median of the supremum of the posterior GP. Our method significantly reduces the number of samples required for estimating high safety probabilities, resulting in faster evaluation without sacrificing accuracy and exploration speed. The effectiveness of our safe active learning approach is demonstrated through extensive simulations and validated using a real-world engine example.
4/16/2024