On Behalf of the Stakeholders: Trends in NLP Model Interpretability in the Era of LLMs

Overview

• Recent advancements in natural language processing (NLP), especially with the introduction of large language models (LLMs), have led to widespread adoption of these systems across various domains.
• This surge in usage has prompted an explosion in research on NLP model interpretability and analysis, accompanied by numerous technical surveys.
• However, these surveys often overlook the needs and perspectives of different explanation stakeholders.

Plain English Explanation

In the past few years, there have been major advancements in the field of natural language processing (NLP), particularly with the development of large language models (LLMs). These powerful AI systems have become widely used across many different areas, influencing decision-making, the job market, society, and scientific research.

As a result, there has been a lot of research focused on understanding and explaining how these NLP models work. Researchers have conducted many technical surveys to analyze the different approaches to model interpretability and analysis.

However, these surveys often fail to consider the needs and perspectives of the various stakeholders who use and are affected by these NLP systems. This paper aims to address three key questions: Why do we need interpretability, what exactly are we trying to interpret, and how can we go about doing that?

By exploring these questions, the authors examine the existing paradigms for model interpretability, their properties, and their relevance to different stakeholders. They also analyze trends from the past decade across multiple research fields to understand the practical implications of these interpretability approaches.

The analysis reveals significant disparities between how NLP developers and non-developer users view and utilize model explanations. For example, explanations of a model's internal components are rarely used outside of the NLP field itself. This highlights the diverse needs and requirements of the different stakeholders involved.

The goal of this paper is to help inform the future design, development, and application of interpretability methods that better align with the objectives and needs of the various parties impacted by these powerful NLP systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by discussing the recent advancements in natural language processing (NLP), particularly the introduction and widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) across a variety of domains. This surge in usage has led to an explosion of research focused on NLP model interpretability and analysis, with numerous technical surveys published on the topic.

However, the authors note that these surveys often fail to consider the needs and perspectives of the different explanation stakeholders, such as NLP developers, domain experts, and end-users. To address this gap, the paper explores three key questions:

1. Why do we need interpretability? The authors examine the motivations and objectives behind the growing demand for model interpretability, considering perspectives from various stakeholders.

2. What are we interpreting? The paper delves into the different aspects of NLP models that can be interpreted, including their internal components, decision-making processes, and output behaviors.

3. How do we interpret these models? The authors review the existing paradigms and approaches for interpreting NLP models, analyzing their properties and relevance to different stakeholders.

To investigate the practical implications of these interpretability paradigms, the researchers retrieved and analyzed thousands of papers from multiple research fields over the past decade. They employed a large language model (LLM) to characterize the trends and insights across this body of literature.

The analysis revealed significant disparities between the needs and perspectives of NLP developers and non-developer users, as well as between different research fields. For example, explanations of a model's internal components were found to be rarely used outside of the NLP domain itself.

These findings underscore the diverse requirements and objectives of the various stakeholders involved in the development, deployment, and use of NLP systems. The paper aims to inform the future design, development, and application of interpretability methods that better align with the needs of these different stakeholders.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and thoughtful exploration of the challenges and complexities surrounding the interpretability of NLP models, particularly in the context of the diverse needs and perspectives of different stakeholders.

One strength of the paper is its rigorous analysis of the trends and insights from a large corpus of research across multiple fields. This data-driven approach helps to ground the discussion in empirical evidence and highlights the real-world implications of the interpretability paradigms.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential limitations or caveats of the research methodology or the interpretability approaches themselves. For example, the authors do not address any potential biases or errors that may have arisen from the LLM-based analysis of the research literature.

Additionally, the paper could have explored more of the potential downsides or unintended consequences of increased NLP model interpretability. For instance, it could have discussed the potential trade-offs between interpretability and model performance, or the risks of over-reliance on interpretability methods in high-stakes decision-making scenarios.

Overall, the paper provides a valuable and thoughtful contribution to the ongoing conversation around NLP model interpretability. By highlighting the diverse needs and perspectives of different stakeholders, it lays the groundwork for the development of more inclusive and effective interpretability methods.

Conclusion

This paper addresses a critical gap in the current research on NLP model interpretability by exploring the diverse needs and perspectives of different stakeholders, including NLP developers, domain experts, and end-users.

Through a comprehensive analysis of trends and insights across a large corpus of research, the authors reveal significant disparities in how various stakeholders view and utilize model explanations. This underscores the need for interpretability methods that are designed to align with the specific objectives and requirements of the different parties affected by the deployment of these powerful NLP systems.

By informing the future development and application of interpretability approaches, this paper has the potential to enhance the transparency, accountability, and trustworthiness of NLP models as they continue to be widely adopted across a growing number of domains. This, in turn, could lead to more informed decision-making, better-informed public discourse, and more equitable outcomes for the many individuals and communities impacted by these transformative technologies.