Understanding Stakeholders' Perceptions and Needs Across the LLM Supply Chain

Overview

• This paper explores the perceptions and needs of stakeholders across the large language model (LLM) supply chain, with a focus on the role of explainable AI (XAI) in fostering trust and transparency.
• The researchers conducted interviews with a diverse set of stakeholders, including LLM developers, deployers, and end-users, to better understand their perspectives and concerns.
• The findings highlight the importance of XAI in addressing the informational needs and trust issues of various stakeholders, and provide insights for designing more effective and trustworthy AI systems.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines how different people involved in the development and use of large language models (LLMs) view these AI systems and what they need from them. LLMs are a type of advanced AI that can generate human-like text, and they are becoming increasingly widespread in various applications.

The researchers talked to a range of stakeholders, including the companies and researchers who create LLMs, the organizations that use them, and the people who interact with them. They wanted to understand what these different groups think about LLMs, what concerns they have, and what features or capabilities they would find most useful.

A key finding was the importance of explainable AI (XAI). XAI refers to AI systems that can provide explanations for their outputs, helping to build trust and transparency. The stakeholders indicated that having a better understanding of how LLMs work and why they make certain decisions would be valuable, both for those developing the technology and those using it.

The researchers hope that these insights can inform the design of future LLM systems, making them more aligned with the needs and expectations of the diverse groups involved in the LLM supply chain. By addressing issues of trust and transparency, these AI systems can be deployed more effectively and responsibly.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a qualitative study that explores the perceptions and needs of stakeholders across the LLM supply chain, with a focus on the role of XAI in fostering trust and transparency.

The researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 40 stakeholders, including LLM developers, deployers, and end-users. The interview protocol covered topics such as stakeholders' understanding of LLMs, their concerns and pain points, and their views on the role of XAI.

The analysis of the interview data revealed several key themes. Stakeholders highlighted the importance of understanding the inner workings of LLMs, as well as the need for greater transparency around model capabilities, limitations, and potential biases. They also expressed a desire for XAI features that could provide explanations for model outputs, help users comprehend the reasoning behind decisions, and enable more effective monitoring and debugging of LLM systems.

The findings suggest that the integration of XAI can play a crucial role in addressing the informational needs and trust issues of various stakeholders across the LLM supply chain. The researchers propose a framework for designing and evaluating XAI systems that are tailored to the specific requirements of different stakeholder groups.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive examination of stakeholder perceptions and needs across the LLM supply chain, highlighting the important role of XAI in fostering trust and transparency. However, the study is limited to a relatively small sample size and may not capture the full diversity of perspectives within the broader LLM ecosystem.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the technical challenges and trade-offs involved in implementing effective XAI solutions for LLMs. For example, it does not address the potential tension between providing explanations and preserving model performance, or the challenges of scaling XAI approaches to large, complex LLM architectures.

Furthermore, the paper does not consider the societal implications and ethical considerations associated with the increased deployment of LLMs, such as the potential for amplifying existing biases or the risks of misuse. Explainability as a requirement for hardware could also be an interesting area for future research.

Overall, the paper offers valuable insights and a solid foundation for further exploration of XAI in the context of LLMs. However, additional research is needed to more fully address the technical, ethical, and societal challenges involved in developing trustworthy and transparent AI systems.

Conclusion

This paper provides an important exploration of the perceptions and needs of stakeholders across the LLM supply chain, highlighting the critical role of XAI in fostering trust and transparency. The findings suggest that addressing issues of explainability and interpretability can help align LLM systems with the informational needs and expectations of diverse groups, from developers to end-users.

By integrating XAI approaches tailored to the requirements of different stakeholders, the LLM industry can work towards building more trustworthy and responsible AI systems. This research offers valuable insights for both the technical and practical aspects of designing and deploying LLMs, paving the way for a more collaborative and inclusive AI ecosystem.