Benchmarking Label Noise in Instance Segmentation: Spatial Noise Matters
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the impact of label noise, specifically spatial noise, on instance segmentation models.
- Instance segmentation is a computer vision task that involves identifying and delineating individual objects within an image.
- The researchers examine how different types and levels of label noise affect the performance of instance segmentation models.
- They propose a new benchmark dataset and evaluation protocol to standardize the study of label noise in instance segmentation.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers wanted to understand how label noise, or errors in the ground truth annotations used to train machine learning models, can affect the performance of instance segmentation models. Instance segmentation is a computer vision task where the goal is to identify and outline the boundaries of individual objects in an image.
Label noise can come in many forms, but the researchers were particularly interested in spatial noise, which occurs when the annotated object boundaries do not perfectly align with the true object boundaries. This type of noise can be common in real-world datasets, where manual annotation of complex objects can be challenging.
To study this problem, the researchers created a new benchmark dataset and evaluation protocol. This allows researchers to systematically introduce different types and levels of label noise and measure the impact on instance segmentation model performance. The goal is to help the broader research community better understand the challenges of working with noisy real-world data and develop more robust instance segmentation algorithms.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews related work on benchmarking the impact of label noise and processing noisy labels in machine learning tasks like classification. It then discusses prior research on the impact of human-annotated label noise on convolutional neural networks and task-specific pretraining for noisy labels in remote sensing.
The core of the paper is the proposal of a new benchmark dataset and evaluation protocol for studying label noise in instance segmentation. The researchers create synthetic instances with known ground truth, then introduce various types of spatial noise to the annotations. This allows them to precisely control the nature and level of label noise.
Using this benchmark, the researchers evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art instance segmentation models under different noise conditions. They find that spatial noise can have a significant detrimental impact on model performance, much more so than other types of label noise like class or instance noise.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable new tool for the research community to study the challenges of working with noisy real-world data in instance segmentation. By creating a controlled benchmark, the researchers can isolate the specific impact of spatial label noise, which is an important practical concern.
However, the paper does not explore mitigation strategies or model architectures that may be more robust to this type of noise. Future work could investigate noise correction techniques or other approaches to improve the performance of instance segmentation models in the presence of spatial label noise.
Additionally, the benchmark dataset, while a useful testbed, may not fully capture the complexities of real-world annotation errors. Further research is needed to understand how these findings translate to more diverse, less controlled datasets.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution by highlighting the significant impact of spatial label noise on instance segmentation models. The new benchmark dataset and evaluation protocol provide a standardized way for researchers to study this problem and develop more robust instance segmentation algorithms.
By drawing attention to the unique challenges of spatial noise, the paper lays the groundwork for future advancements in handling noisy real-world data in computer vision. This is a critical step towards building reliable and deployable instance segmentation systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Benchmarking Label Noise in Instance Segmentation: Spatial Noise Matters
Eden Grad, Moshe Kimhi, Lion Halika, Chaim Baskin
Obtaining accurate labels for instance segmentation is particularly challenging due to the complex nature of the task. Each image necessitates multiple annotations, encompassing not only the object's class but also its precise spatial boundaries. These requirements elevate the likelihood of errors and inconsistencies in both manual and automated annotation processes. By simulating different noise conditions, we provide a realistic scenario for assessing the robustness and generalization capabilities of instance segmentation models in different segmentation tasks, introducing COCO-N and Cityscapes-N. We also propose a benchmark for weakly annotation noise, dubbed COCO-WAN, which utilizes foundation models and weak annotations to simulate semi-automated annotation tools and their noisy labels. This study sheds light on the quality of segmentation masks produced by various models and challenges the efficacy of popular methods designed to address learning with label noise.
Read more6/19/2024
👁️
0
NoiseBench: Benchmarking the Impact of Real Label Noise on Named Entity Recognition
Elena Merdjanovska, Ansar Aynetdinov, Alan Akbik
Available training data for named entity recognition (NER) often contains a significant percentage of incorrect labels for entity types and entity boundaries. Such label noise poses challenges for supervised learning and may significantly deteriorate model quality. To address this, prior work proposed various noise-robust learning approaches capable of learning from data with partially incorrect labels. These approaches are typically evaluated using simulated noise where the labels in a clean dataset are automatically corrupted. However, as we show in this paper, this leads to unrealistic noise that is far easier to handle than real noise caused by human error or semi-automatic annotation. To enable the study of the impact of various types of real noise, we introduce NoiseBench, an NER benchmark consisting of clean training data corrupted with 6 types of real noise, including expert errors, crowdsourcing errors, automatic annotation errors and LLM errors. We present an analysis that shows that real noise is significantly more challenging than simulated noise, and show that current state-of-the-art models for noise-robust learning fall far short of their theoretically achievable upper bound. We release NoiseBench to the research community.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Noisy Label Processing for Classification: A Survey
Mengting Li, Chuang Zhu
In recent years, deep neural networks (DNNs) have gained remarkable achievement in computer vision tasks, and the success of DNNs often depends greatly on the richness of data. However, the acquisition process of data and high-quality ground truth requires a lot of manpower and money. In the long, tedious process of data annotation, annotators are prone to make mistakes, resulting in incorrect labels of images, i.e., noisy labels. The emergence of noisy labels is inevitable. Moreover, since research shows that DNNs can easily fit noisy labels, the existence of noisy labels will cause significant damage to the model training process. Therefore, it is crucial to combat noisy labels for computer vision tasks, especially for classification tasks. In this survey, we first comprehensively review the evolution of different deep learning approaches for noisy label combating in the image classification task. In addition, we also review different noise patterns that have been proposed to design robust algorithms. Furthermore, we explore the inner pattern of real-world label noise and propose an algorithm to generate a synthetic label noise pattern guided by real-world data. We test the algorithm on the well-known real-world dataset CIFAR-10N to form a new real-world data-guided synthetic benchmark and evaluate some typical noise-robust methods on the benchmark.
Read more4/8/2024
🖼️
0
Human-annotated label noise and their impact on ConvNets for remote sensing image scene classification
Longkang Peng, Tao Wei, Xuehong Chen, Xiaobei Chen, Rui Sun, Luoma Wan, Jin Chen, Xiaolin Zhu
Convolutional neural networks (ConvNets) have been successfully applied to satellite image scene classification. Human-labeled training datasets are essential for ConvNets to perform accurate classification. Errors in human-annotated training datasets are unavoidable due to the complexity of satellite images. However, the distribution of real-world human-annotated label noises on remote sensing images and their impact on ConvNets have not been investigated. To fill this research gap, this study, for the first time, collected real-world labels from 32 participants and explored how their annotated label noise affect three representative ConvNets (VGG16, GoogleNet, and ResNet-50) for remote sensing image scene classification. We found that: (1) human-annotated label noise exhibits significant class and instance dependence; (2) an additional 1% of human-annotated label noise in training data leads to 0.5% reduction in the overall accuracy of ConvNets classification; (3) the error pattern of ConvNet predictions was strongly correlated with that of participant's labels. To uncover the mechanism underlying the impact of human labeling errors on ConvNets, we further compared it with three types of simulated label noise: uniform noise, class-dependent noise and instance-dependent noise. Our results show that the impact of human-annotated label noise on ConvNets significantly differs from all three types of simulated label noise, while both class dependence and instance dependence contribute to the impact of human-annotated label noise on ConvNets. These observations necessitate a reevaluation of the handling of noisy labels, and we anticipate that our real-world label noise dataset would facilitate the future development and assessment of label-noise learning algorithms.
Read more5/1/2024