Benchmarking Multi-Image Understanding in Vision and Language Models: Perception, Knowledge, Reasoning, and Multi-Hop Reasoning
2406.12742
0
0
Abstract
The advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly broadened the scope of applications in natural language processing, with multi-modal LLMs extending these capabilities to integrate and interpret visual data. However, existing benchmarks for visual language models (VLMs) predominantly focus on single-image inputs, neglecting the crucial aspect of multi-image understanding. In this paper, we introduce a Multi-Image Relational Benchmark MIRB, designed to evaluate VLMs' ability to compare, analyze, and reason across multiple images. Our benchmark encompasses four categories: perception, visual world knowledge, reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning. Through a comprehensive evaluation of a wide range of open-source and closed-source models, we demonstrate that while open-source VLMs were shown to approach the performance of GPT-4V in single-image tasks, a significant performance gap remains in multi-image reasoning tasks. Our findings also reveal that even the state-of-the-art GPT-4V model struggles with our benchmark, underscoring the need for further research and development in this area. We believe our contribution of MIRB could serve as a testbed for developing the next-generation multi-modal models.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the multi-image understanding capabilities of vision and language models.
- The benchmark covers four key aspects: perception, knowledge, reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning.
- The authors introduce several new datasets and evaluation tasks to assess these capabilities in a more nuanced way.
- The results show that existing models still struggle with certain aspects of multi-image understanding, highlighting opportunities for further research and development.
Plain English Explanation
This paper looks at how well artificial intelligence (AI) models can understand and reason about multiple images at once. The researchers created a new set of tests, or a "benchmark," to evaluate different aspects of this ability.
The first aspect is perception - how well the AI can identify and describe the contents of the images. The second is knowledge - how much general information the AI has that it can use to understand the images. The third is reasoning - how well the AI can draw logical conclusions from the information in the images. And the fourth is multi-hop reasoning - how well the AI can tackle more complex problems that require combining information from multiple images.
The researchers introduced several new datasets and evaluation tasks to test these capabilities in a more nuanced way than previous benchmarks. When they tested existing AI models on this new benchmark, the results showed that the models still struggle with certain aspects of understanding multiple images at once.
This work highlights areas where AI systems need to improve in order to truly understand the world around them by looking at multiple visual inputs. It provides a valuable tool for researchers and developers to assess progress in this important area of artificial intelligence.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the [object Object] benchmark, which is designed to comprehensively evaluate the multi-image understanding capabilities of vision and language models across four key dimensions: [object Object], knowledge, reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning.
To assess perception, the benchmark includes tasks such as multi-image captioning and visual question answering. The knowledge aspect is evaluated through tasks that require integrating information from multiple images and external knowledge. For reasoning, the benchmark includes tasks that test the model's ability to make logical inferences from the visual inputs. Finally, the multi-hop reasoning tasks assess the model's capacity to combine information across multiple images to answer complex, multi-step questions.
The authors introduce several new datasets to support these evaluation tasks, including [object Object], [object Object], and an extension of the [object Object] benchmark.
When evaluating existing vision and language models on the MUIRBench, the results show that while these models perform reasonably well on perception and knowledge tasks, they still struggle with more complex reasoning and multi-hop reasoning abilities. This highlights important opportunities for further research and development in the field of multi-image understanding.
Critical Analysis
The MUIRBench provides a valuable and comprehensive assessment of the multi-image understanding capabilities of vision and language models. By breaking down the evaluation into distinct aspects of perception, knowledge, reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning, the benchmark offers a more nuanced view of model performance than previous benchmarks.
One potential limitation of the benchmark is the reliance on specific datasets and tasks, which may not fully capture the breadth of real-world multi-image understanding problems. Additionally, the evaluation tasks are primarily based on textual questions and answers, which may not fully reflect the range of ways that humans interact with and reason about multiple images.
Further research could explore expanding the benchmark to include a wider variety of task types, such as open-ended image-to-text generation or interactive, multi-step reasoning tasks. Incorporating more diverse datasets and modalities, such as audio or video, could also help to broaden the scope of the evaluation.
Overall, the MUIRBench represents an important step forward in benchmarking the multi-image understanding capabilities of AI systems. As the field of artificial intelligence continues to advance, tools like this will be crucial for driving progress and ensuring that AI models can truly comprehend the world around them.
Conclusion
This paper presents the MUIRBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the multi-image understanding capabilities of vision and language models. The benchmark assesses four key aspects: perception, knowledge, reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning, using a variety of new datasets and evaluation tasks.
The results show that while existing models perform reasonably well on perception and knowledge tasks, they struggle with more complex reasoning and multi-hop reasoning abilities. This highlights important opportunities for further research and development in the field of multi-image understanding, which is essential for building AI systems that can truly comprehend and reason about the world around them.
The MUIRBench provides a valuable tool for researchers and developers to assess progress in this area and drive the advancement of multi-image understanding capabilities in artificial intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Behind the Magic, MERLIM: Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark for Large Image-Language Models
Andr'es Villa, Juan Carlos Le'on Alc'azar, Alvaro Soto, Bernard Ghanem
0
0
Large Vision and Language Models have enabled significant advances in fully supervised and zero-shot visual tasks. These large architectures serve as the baseline to what is currently known as Instruction Tuning Large Vision and Language models (IT-LVLMs). IT-LVLMs are general-purpose multi-modal assistants whose responses are modulated by natural language instructions and visual data. Despite this versatility, IT-LVLM effectiveness in fundamental computer vision problems remains unclear, primarily due to the absence of a standardized evaluation benchmark. This paper introduces a Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark named MERLIM, a scalable test-bed to assess the capabilities of IT-LVLMs on fundamental computer vision tasks. MERLIM contains over 300K image-question pairs and has a strong focus on detecting cross-modal hallucination events in IT-LVLMs. Our results bring important insights on the performance of state-of-the-art IT-LVMLs including limitations at identifying fine-grained visual concepts, object hallucinations across tasks, and biases towards the language query. Our findings also suggest that these models have weak visual grounding, but manage to make adequate guesses from global visual patterns or language biases contained in the LLM component.
6/13/2024
MuirBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Robust Multi-image Understanding
Fei Wang, Xingyu Fu, James Y. Huang, Zekun Li, Qin Liu, Xiaogeng Liu, Mingyu Derek Ma, Nan Xu, Wenxuan Zhou, Kai Zhang, Tianyi Lorena Yan, Wenjie Jacky Mo, Hsiang-Hui Liu, Pan Lu, Chunyuan Li, Chaowei Xiao, Kai-Wei Chang, Dan Roth, Sheng Zhang, Hoifung Poon, Muhao Chen
0
0
We introduce MuirBench, a comprehensive benchmark that focuses on robust multi-image understanding capabilities of multimodal LLMs. MuirBench consists of 12 diverse multi-image tasks (e.g., scene understanding, ordering) that involve 10 categories of multi-image relations (e.g., multiview, temporal relations). Comprising 11,264 images and 2,600 multiple-choice questions, MuirBench is created in a pairwise manner, where each standard instance is paired with an unanswerable variant that has minimal semantic differences, in order for a reliable assessment. Evaluated upon 20 recent multi-modal LLMs, our results reveal that even the best-performing models like GPT-4o and Gemini Pro find it challenging to solve MuirBench, achieving 68.0% and 49.3% in accuracy. Open-source multimodal LLMs trained on single images can hardly generalize to multi-image questions, hovering below 33.3% in accuracy. These results highlight the importance of MuirBench in encouraging the community to develop multimodal LLMs that can look beyond a single image, suggesting potential pathways for future improvements.
6/14/2024
A Cognitive Evaluation Benchmark of Image Reasoning and Description for Large Vision-Language Models
Xiujie Song, Mengyue Wu, Kenny Q. Zhu, Chunhao Zhang, Yanyi Chen
0
0
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), despite their recent success, are hardly comprehensively tested for their cognitive abilities. Inspired by the prevalent use of the Cookie Theft task in human cognition test, we propose a novel evaluation benchmark to evaluate high-level cognitive ability of LVLMs using images with rich semantics. It defines eight reasoning capabilities and consists of an image description task and a visual question answering task. Our evaluation on well-known LVLMs shows that there is still a large gap in cognitive ability between LVLMs and humans.
6/17/2024
š¬
BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive
Xingyu Fu, Yushi Hu, Bangzheng Li, Yu Feng, Haoyu Wang, Xudong Lin, Dan Roth, Noah A. Smith, Wei-Chiu Ma, Ranjay Krishna
0
0
We introduce Blink, a new benchmark for multimodal language models (LLMs) that focuses on core visual perception abilities not found in other evaluations. Most of the Blink tasks can be solved by humans within a blink (e.g., relative depth estimation, visual correspondence, forensics detection, and multi-view reasoning). However, we find these perception-demanding tasks cast significant challenges for current multimodal LLMs because they resist mediation through natural language. Blink reformats 14 classic computer vision tasks into 3,807 multiple-choice questions, paired with single or multiple images and visual prompting. While humans get 95.70% accuracy on average, Blink is surprisingly challenging for existing multimodal LLMs: even the best-performing GPT-4V and Gemini achieve accuracies of 51.26% and 45.72%, only 13.17% and 7.63% higher than random guessing, indicating that such perception abilities have not emerged yet in recent multimodal LLMs. Our analysis also highlights that specialist CV models could solve these problems much better, suggesting potential pathways for future improvements. We believe Blink will stimulate the community to help multimodal LLMs catch up with human-level visual perception.
7/4/2024