A Cognitive Evaluation Benchmark of Image Reasoning and Description for Large Vision-Language Models
2402.18409
0
0
Abstract
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), despite their recent success, are hardly comprehensively tested for their cognitive abilities. Inspired by the prevalent use of the Cookie Theft task in human cognition test, we propose a novel evaluation benchmark to evaluate high-level cognitive ability of LVLMs using images with rich semantics. It defines eight reasoning capabilities and consists of an image description task and a visual question answering task. Our evaluation on well-known LVLMs shows that there is still a large gap in cognitive ability between LVLMs and humans.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a new benchmark dataset for evaluating the image reasoning and description capabilities of large vision-language models.
- The dataset, called Diffusyn Bench, is designed to assess the models' understanding of visual concepts, causal reasoning, and language generation.
- The authors demonstrate the usefulness of this benchmark by evaluating several state-of-the-art vision-language models, revealing their strengths and weaknesses.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new dataset called Diffusyn Bench that is designed to test the capabilities of large AI models that can understand both images and language. These models, known as vision-language models, are becoming increasingly important in fields like image captioning, visual question answering, and multimodal reasoning.
The Diffusyn Bench dataset includes a variety of images and associated questions or descriptions that are meant to challenge the models' understanding of visual concepts, cause-and-effect relationships, and language generation. For example, the dataset might include an image of a person riding a bike, along with a question asking why the person is riding the bike.
By evaluating several state-of-the-art vision-language models on this new benchmark, the authors are able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of these models. This information can help researchers and developers improve the performance of these models and make them more useful in real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The authors of this paper present a new benchmark dataset called Diffusyn Bench for evaluating the image reasoning and description capabilities of large vision-language models. The dataset was designed to assess these models' understanding of visual concepts, causal reasoning, and language generation.
To construct the dataset, the authors collected a diverse set of images and associated questions or descriptions that were designed to probe the models' cognitive capabilities. For example, the dataset includes images that depict causal relationships, such as a person riding a bike, along with questions that ask about the underlying causes or reasons for the observed events.
The authors then evaluated several state-of-the-art vision-language models, including LXMERT, VisualBERT, and DALL-E, on the Diffusyn Bench dataset. Their results reveal the strengths and weaknesses of these models in terms of their ability to reason about visual concepts, understand causal relationships, and generate relevant and coherent language.
Critical Analysis
The Diffusyn Bench dataset introduced in this paper represents a valuable contribution to the field of vision-language research. By focusing on cognitive abilities like causal reasoning and conceptual understanding, the benchmark provides a more nuanced and holistic assessment of model performance compared to traditional tasks like image captioning or visual question answering.
However, the authors acknowledge that the dataset is not without limitations. For example, the dataset is relatively small in size, which may limit its ability to fully capture the breadth of visual and linguistic phenomena that large vision-language models are expected to handle. Additionally, the authors note that the dataset's reliance on crowd-sourced annotations could introduce some biases or inconsistencies.
It would be interesting to see how the Diffusyn Bench benchmark compares to other recently proposed vision-language evaluation frameworks, such as the Interactive Image Retrieval benchmark, which focuses on more user-centric and interactive aspects of model performance.
Conclusion
The Diffusyn Bench dataset introduced in this paper represents an important step forward in the development of more comprehensive and cognitively-grounded benchmarks for evaluating the capabilities of large vision-language models. By assessing these models' understanding of visual concepts, causal reasoning, and language generation, the benchmark provides valuable insights that can inform the ongoing research and development of these powerful AI systems.
As vision-language models continue to advance and become increasingly integrated into real-world applications, tools like the Diffusyn Bench will be essential for ensuring that these models are not only technically capable, but also aligned with the cognitive and reasoning abilities that are essential for meaningful and effective human-AI interaction.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models' Understanding of Real-World Complexities Through Synthetic Benchmarks
Haokun Zhou, Yipeng Hong
0
0
This study assesses the ability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) to differentiate between AI-generated and human-generated images. It introduces a new automated benchmark construction method for this evaluation. The experiment compared common LVLMs with human participants using a mixed dataset of AI and human-created images. Results showed that LVLMs could distinguish between the image types to some extent but exhibited a rightward bias, and perform significantly worse compared to humans. To build on these findings, we developed an automated benchmark construction process using AI. This process involved topic retrieval, narrative script generation, error embedding, and image generation, creating a diverse set of text-image pairs with intentional errors. We validated our method through constructing two caparable benchmarks. This study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of LVLMs in real-world understanding and advances benchmark construction techniques, providing a scalable and automatic approach for AI model evaluation.
6/14/2024
What is the Visual Cognition Gap between Humans and Multimodal LLMs?
Xu Cao, Bolin Lai, Wenqian Ye, Yunsheng Ma, Joerg Heintz, Jintai Chen, Jianguo Cao, James M. Rehg
0
0
Recently, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown great promise in language-guided perceptual tasks such as recognition, segmentation, and object detection. However, their effectiveness in addressing visual cognition problems that require high-level reasoning is not well-established. One such challenge is abstract visual reasoning (AVR) -- the cognitive ability to discern relationships among patterns in a set of images and extrapolate to predict subsequent patterns. This skill is crucial during the early neurodevelopmental stages of children. Inspired by the AVR tasks in Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC), we propose a new dataset MaRs-VQA and a new benchmark VCog-Bench containing three datasets to evaluate the zero-shot AVR capability of MLLMs and compare their performance with existing human intelligent investigation. Our comparative experiments with different open-source and closed-source MLLMs on the VCog-Bench revealed a gap between MLLMs and human intelligence, highlighting the visual cognitive limitations of current MLLMs. We believe that the public release of VCog-Bench, consisting of MaRs-VQA, and the inference pipeline will drive progress toward the next generation of MLLMs with human-like visual cognition abilities.
6/18/2024
Benchmarking Multi-Image Understanding in Vision and Language Models: Perception, Knowledge, Reasoning, and Multi-Hop Reasoning
Bingchen Zhao, Yongshuo Zong, Letian Zhang, Timothy Hospedales
0
0
The advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly broadened the scope of applications in natural language processing, with multi-modal LLMs extending these capabilities to integrate and interpret visual data. However, existing benchmarks for visual language models (VLMs) predominantly focus on single-image inputs, neglecting the crucial aspect of multi-image understanding. In this paper, we introduce a Multi-Image Relational Benchmark MIRB, designed to evaluate VLMs' ability to compare, analyze, and reason across multiple images. Our benchmark encompasses four categories: perception, visual world knowledge, reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning. Through a comprehensive evaluation of a wide range of open-source and closed-source models, we demonstrate that while open-source VLMs were shown to approach the performance of GPT-4V in single-image tasks, a significant performance gap remains in multi-image reasoning tasks. Our findings also reveal that even the state-of-the-art GPT-4V model struggles with our benchmark, underscoring the need for further research and development in this area. We believe our contribution of MIRB could serve as a testbed for developing the next-generation multi-modal models.
6/19/2024
Is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words? Delving Into Spatial Reasoning for Vision Language Models
Jiayu Wang, Yifei Ming, Zhenmei Shi, Vibhav Vineet, Xin Wang, Neel Joshi
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks and domains. Despite this promise, spatial understanding and reasoning -- a fundamental component of human cognition -- remains under-explored. We develop novel benchmarks that cover diverse aspects of spatial reasoning such as relationship understanding, navigation, and counting. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of competitive language and vision-language models. Our findings reveal several counter-intuitive insights that have been overlooked in the literature: (1) Spatial reasoning poses significant challenges where competitive models can fall behind random guessing; (2) Despite additional visual input, VLMs often under-perform compared to their LLM counterparts; (3) When both textual and visual information is available, multi-modal language models become less reliant on visual information if sufficient textual clues are provided. Additionally, we demonstrate that leveraging redundancy between vision and text can significantly enhance model performance. We hope our study will inform the development of multimodal models to improve spatial intelligence and further close the gap with human intelligence.
6/24/2024