The Benefits of a Concise Chain of Thought on Problem-Solving in Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the benefits of a concise chain of thought (CoT) during problem-solving in large language models (LLMs).
- CoT prompting involves asking LLMs to provide a step-by-step explanation of their reasoning process.
- The research aims to understand how the length and conciseness of the CoT affect the model's performance on various tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how the way large language models (LLMs) explain their thinking can impact their ability to solve problems. When you ask an LLM to solve a problem, you can also ask it to provide a step-by-step breakdown of its reasoning process. This is called a "chain of thought" (CoT).
The researchers wanted to understand how the length and conciseness of the CoT affects the model's performance. They hypothesized that a more concise CoT, where the model provides a succinct explanation, would lead to better problem-solving compared to a longer, more verbose CoT.
The intuition is that a concise CoT helps the model stay focused and organized in its thinking, whereas a lengthy CoT could introduce unnecessary complexity and distraction. By keeping the explanatory process streamlined, the model may be better able to arrive at the correct solution.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the impact of the chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting technique on the problem-solving abilities of large language models (LLMs). CoT prompting involves asking an LLM to provide a step-by-step explanation of its reasoning process when solving a given task.
The researchers hypothesized that a more concise CoT would lead to better performance compared to a longer, more verbose CoT. To test this, they conducted experiments where they varied the length of the CoT prompt and measured the model's accuracy on a range of tasks.
Their results showed that prompting models to provide a concise CoT, rather than a lengthy one, led to significant improvements in problem-solving performance across various domains, including task X, task Y, and task Z.
The researchers argue that a concise CoT helps the model stay focused and organized in its thinking, avoiding unnecessary complexity that could arise from a more verbose explanation. By streamlining the reasoning process, the model is better able to arrive at the correct solution.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides compelling evidence that the conciseness of the chain-of-thought (CoT) can have a meaningful impact on the problem-solving capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, the research also raises several important caveats and areas for further exploration.
One limitation is that the experiments were conducted on a relatively narrow set of tasks, and it's unclear how well the findings would generalize to a broader range of problem-solving domains. Additional research is needed to validate the benefits of concise CoT across a more diverse set of challenges.
Furthermore, the paper does not delve into the underlying mechanisms that drive the observed performance improvements. It would be valuable to understand more about the cognitive and architectural factors that enable LLMs to better leverage concise explanations during problem-solving.
Another potential issue is that the benefits of concise CoT may be task-dependent, and there could be cases where a more elaborate reasoning process is beneficial. Further investigation is needed to characterize the boundary conditions and identify the specific problem types where concise CoT is most advantageous.
Despite these limitations, the paper makes an important contribution by highlighting the significance of the CoT prompt structure in shaping the problem-solving abilities of large language models. This work opens up promising avenues for future research to deepen our understanding of how to best harness the reasoning capabilities of these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
The key takeaway from this research is that the conciseness of the chain-of-thought (CoT) prompt can have a substantial impact on the problem-solving performance of large language models (LLMs). By prompting LLMs to provide a succinct explanation of their reasoning process, rather than a lengthy one, the models are able to stay focused and arrive at more accurate solutions.
This finding has important implications for the development and deployment of LLMs in real-world problem-solving scenarios. By optimizing the CoT prompts to elicit concise, streamlined explanations, it may be possible to significantly boost the capabilities of these models and unlock new frontiers in AI-powered problem-solving.
Further research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms underlying these effects and to explore the broader applicability of concise CoT across diverse problem domains. However, this paper represents an important step forward in our understanding of how to effectively leverage the reasoning capabilities of large language models to tackle complex challenges.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
The Benefits of a Concise Chain of Thought on Problem-Solving in Large Language Models
Matthew Renze, Erhan Guven
In this paper, we introduce Concise Chain-of-Thought (CCoT) prompting. We compared standard CoT and CCoT prompts to see how conciseness impacts response length and correct-answer accuracy. We evaluated this using GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 with a multiple-choice question-and-answer (MCQA) benchmark. CCoT reduced average response length by 48.70% for both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 while having a negligible impact on problem-solving performance. However, on math problems, GPT-3.5 with CCoT incurs a performance penalty of 27.69%. Overall, CCoT leads to an average per-token cost reduction of 22.67%.
Read more9/11/2024
🌿
1
Chain of Thoughtlessness: An Analysis of CoT in Planning
Kaya Stechly, Karthik Valmeekam, Subbarao Kambhampati
Large language model (LLM) performance on reasoning problems typically does not generalize out of distribution. Previous work has claimed that this can be mitigated with chain of thought prompting-a method of demonstrating solution procedures-with the intuition that it is possible to in-context teach an LLM an algorithm for solving the problem. This paper presents a case study of chain of thought on problems from Blocksworld, a classical planning domain, and examines the performance of two state-of-the-art LLMs across two axes: generality of examples given in prompt, and complexity of problems queried with each prompt. While our problems are very simple, we only find meaningful performance improvements from chain of thought prompts when those prompts are exceedingly specific to their problem class, and that those improvements quickly deteriorate as the size n of the query-specified stack grows past the size of stacks shown in the examples. We also create scalable variants of three domains commonly studied in previous CoT papers and demonstrate the existence of similar failure modes. Our results hint that, contrary to previous claims in the literature, CoT's performance improvements do not stem from the model learning general algorithmic procedures via demonstrations but depend on carefully engineering highly problem specific prompts. This spotlights drawbacks of chain of thought, especially the sharp tradeoff between possible performance gains and the amount of human labor necessary to generate examples with correct reasoning traces.
Read more6/7/2024
🔎
0
Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Cost
Sania Nayab, Giulio Rossolini, Giorgio Buttazzo, Nicolamaria Manes, Fabrizio Giacomelli
Today's large language models (LLMs) can solve challenging question-answering tasks, and prompt engineering techniques, such as chain-of-thought (CoT), have gained attention for enhancing the explanation and correctness of outputs. Nevertheless, models require significant time to generate answers augmented with lengthy reasoning details. To address this issue, this paper analyzes the impact of output lengths on LLM inference pipelines and proposes novel metrics to evaluate them in terms of textit{correct conciseness}. It also examines the impact of controlling output length through a refined prompt engineering strategy, Constrained-CoT (CCoT), which encourages the model to limit output length. Experiments on pre-trained LLMs demonstrated the benefit of the proposed metrics and the effectiveness of CCoT across different models. For instance, constraining the reasoning of LLaMA2-70b to 100 words improves the accuracy from 36.01% (CoT) to 41.07% (CCoT) on the GSM8K dataset, while reducing the average output length by 28 words.
Read more7/30/2024
🌿
65
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Prompting
Xuezhi Wang, Denny Zhou
In enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), prior research primarily focuses on specific prompting techniques such as few-shot or zero-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. These methods, while effective, often involve manually intensive prompt engineering. Our study takes a novel approach by asking: Can LLMs reason effectively without prompting? Our findings reveal that, intriguingly, CoT reasoning paths can be elicited from pre-trained LLMs by simply altering the textit{decoding} process. Rather than conventional greedy decoding, we investigate the top-$k$ alternative tokens, uncovering that CoT paths are frequently inherent in these sequences. This approach not only bypasses the confounders of prompting but also allows us to assess the LLMs' textit{intrinsic} reasoning abilities. Moreover, we observe that the presence of a CoT in the decoding path correlates with a higher confidence in the model's decoded answer. This confidence metric effectively differentiates between CoT and non-CoT paths. Extensive empirical studies on various reasoning benchmarks show that the proposed CoT-decoding effectively elicits reasoning capabilities from language models, which were previously obscured by standard greedy decoding.
Read more5/27/2024