Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Cost

Read original: arXiv:2407.19825 - Published 7/30/2024 by Sania Nayab, Giulio Rossolini, Giorgio Buttazzo, Nicolamaria Manes, Fabrizio Giacomelli
Total Score

0

🔎

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents additional studies on the CCoT (Concise Correctness) prompt, which is a technique for improving the concise and accurate generation of text by large language models.
  • The paper explores various metrics for assessing the concise correctness of model outputs and provides insights into the factors that influence this property.

Plain English Explanation

The CCoT prompt is a way to help large language models generate more concise and accurate text. This paper looks at different ways to measure how well the models are doing at this, and what factors affect their ability to be concise and correct.

The researchers tried out various metrics to assess the "concise correctness" of the model's outputs. This means measuring how clearly and accurately the model can convey information, without being overly wordy or making mistakes.

By experimenting with these metrics, the researchers gained insights into the factors that influence a model's ability to be concise and correct. For example, they may have found that the length of the input prompt or the complexity of the task can affect the model's performance in this area.

Understanding these factors is important because it can help us improve the design and use of large language models to make them more effective at generating clear, accurate, and concise text.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents additional studies on the CCoT (Concise Correctness) prompt, a technique for enhancing the concise and accurate generation of text by large language models.

The researchers explore various metrics for assessing the concise correctness of model outputs, including:

By evaluating model performance across these different metrics, the authors aim to gain deeper insights into the factors that influence a model's ability to generate concise and correct text.

Some of the key factors investigated include:

The findings from these studies contribute to a better understanding of how to design and use large language models to optimize for concise and accurate text generation, which has important applications in areas like summarization, question-answering, and conversational AI.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful exploration of the factors that influence the concise correctness of text generated by large language models. The researchers' focus on developing robust evaluation metrics is particularly commendable, as it allows for a more nuanced assessment of model performance beyond simply measuring accuracy or perplexity.

However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations in the current study, such as the need for further investigation into the generalizability of the findings across different model architectures and domains.

Additionally, while the paper presents a detailed technical explanation of the research, there may be an opportunity to further challenge or question aspects of the study design or interpretation of the results. For example, the potential biases or confounding factors in the evaluation metrics could be explored in more depth.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of concise correctness in large language models, but there remains room for additional research and critical analysis to further advance the field.

Conclusion

This paper presents a series of studies that explore the concept of "concise correctness" in the context of large language models. By developing and applying various metrics to assess the concision, accuracy, and coherence of model outputs, the researchers have gained important insights into the factors that influence a model's ability to generate concise and correct text.

The findings from this research have the potential to inform the design and development of large language models that are better equipped to produce clear, accurate, and concise text, which is crucial for applications ranging from summarization to conversational AI. As the field of natural language processing continues to evolve, studies like this one will play a vital role in driving progress and ensuring that these powerful models are utilized to their full potential.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔎

Total Score

0

Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Cost

Sania Nayab, Giulio Rossolini, Giorgio Buttazzo, Nicolamaria Manes, Fabrizio Giacomelli

Today's large language models (LLMs) can solve challenging question-answering tasks, and prompt engineering techniques, such as chain-of-thought (CoT), have gained attention for enhancing the explanation and correctness of outputs. Nevertheless, models require significant time to generate answers augmented with lengthy reasoning details. To address this issue, this paper analyzes the impact of output lengths on LLM inference pipelines and proposes novel metrics to evaluate them in terms of textit{correct conciseness}. It also examines the impact of controlling output length through a refined prompt engineering strategy, Constrained-CoT (CCoT), which encourages the model to limit output length. Experiments on pre-trained LLMs demonstrated the benefit of the proposed metrics and the effectiveness of CCoT across different models. For instance, constraining the reasoning of LLaMA2-70b to 100 words improves the accuracy from 36.01% (CoT) to 41.07% (CCoT) on the GSM8K dataset, while reducing the average output length by 28 words.

Read more

7/30/2024

The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language Models
Total Score

1

The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language Models

Mingyu Jin, Qinkai Yu, Dong Shu, Haiyan Zhao, Wenyue Hua, Yanda Meng, Yongfeng Zhang, Mengnan Du

Chain of Thought (CoT) is significant in improving the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). However, the correlation between the effectiveness of CoT and the length of reasoning steps in prompts remains largely unknown. To shed light on this, we have conducted several empirical experiments to explore the relations. Specifically, we design experiments that expand and compress the rationale reasoning steps within CoT demonstrations while keeping all other factors constant. We have the following key findings. First, the results indicate that lengthening the reasoning steps in prompts, even without adding new information into the prompt, considerably enhances LLMs' reasoning abilities across multiple datasets. Alternatively, shortening the reasoning steps, even while preserving the key information, significantly diminishes the reasoning abilities of models. This finding highlights the importance of the number of steps in CoT prompts and provides practical guidance to make better use of LLMs' potential in complex problem-solving scenarios. Second, we also investigated the relationship between the performance of CoT and the rationales used in demonstrations. Surprisingly, the result shows that even incorrect rationales can yield favorable outcomes if they maintain the requisite length of inference. Third, we observed that the advantages of increasing reasoning steps are task-dependent: simpler tasks require fewer steps, whereas complex tasks gain significantly from longer inference sequences. The code is available at https://github.com/MingyuJ666/The-Impact-of-Reasoning-Step-Length-on-Large-Language-Models

Read more

6/26/2024

Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Models
Total Score

1

Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Models

Mosh Levy, Alon Jacoby, Yoav Goldberg

This paper explores the impact of extending input lengths on the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). Despite LLMs advancements in recent times, their performance consistency across different input lengths is not well understood. We investigate this aspect by introducing a novel QA reasoning framework, specifically designed to assess the impact of input length. We isolate the effect of input length using multiple versions of the same sample, each being extended with padding of different lengths, types and locations. Our findings show a notable degradation in LLMs' reasoning performance at much shorter input lengths than their technical maximum. We show that the degradation trend appears in every version of our dataset, although at different intensities. Additionally, our study reveals that the traditional metric of next word prediction correlates negatively with performance of LLMs' on our reasoning dataset. We analyse our results and identify failure modes that can serve as useful guides for future research, potentially informing strategies to address the limitations observed in LLMs.

Read more

7/11/2024

The Benefits of a Concise Chain of Thought on Problem-Solving in Large Language Models
Total Score

0

The Benefits of a Concise Chain of Thought on Problem-Solving in Large Language Models

Matthew Renze, Erhan Guven

In this paper, we introduce Concise Chain-of-Thought (CCoT) prompting. We compared standard CoT and CCoT prompts to see how conciseness impacts response length and correct-answer accuracy. We evaluated this using GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 with a multiple-choice question-and-answer (MCQA) benchmark. CCoT reduced average response length by 48.70% for both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 while having a negligible impact on problem-solving performance. However, on math problems, GPT-3.5 with CCoT incurs a performance penalty of 27.69%. Overall, CCoT leads to an average per-token cost reduction of 22.67%.

Read more

9/11/2024