On the best approximation by finite Gaussian mixtures
2404.08913
0
0
📉
Abstract
We consider the problem of approximating a general Gaussian location mixture by finite mixtures. The minimum order of finite mixtures that achieve a prescribed accuracy (measured by various $f$-divergences) is determined within constant factors for the family of mixing distributions with compactly support or appropriate assumptions on the tail probability including subgaussian and subexponential. While the upper bound is achieved using the technique of local moment matching, the lower bound is established by relating the best approximation error to the low-rank approximation of certain trigonometric moment matrices, followed by a refined spectral analysis of their minimum eigenvalue. In the case of Gaussian mixing distributions, this result corrects a previous lower bound in [Allerton Conference 48 (2010) 620-628].
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the best way to approximate a probability distribution using a finite mixture of Gaussian distributions.
- The main results establish theoretical limits on the accuracy of such approximations and compare them to previous work.
- The analysis provides insights into the fundamental tradeoffs involved in density estimation using finite Gaussian mixtures.
Plain English Explanation
Probability distributions are mathematical functions that describe how likely different outcomes are. They are widely used in fields like machine learning, statistics, and data analysis. One common way to model a probability distribution is by using a finite Gaussian mixture. This involves combining several bell-shaped curves (Gaussian distributions) to approximate the true underlying distribution.
The key question addressed in this paper is: what is the best possible approximation that can be achieved using a finite Gaussian mixture? The authors derive theoretical bounds on the accuracy of such approximations, and compare their results to previous work in this area. This sheds light on the fundamental tradeoffs involved in density estimation using finite Gaussian mixtures.
For example, the authors show that as the number of Gaussian components in the mixture increases, the approximation error decreases, but there are limits to how accurate the approximation can be. Understanding these limits is important for applications where density estimation is crucial, such as truncated density estimation and particle-based optimization.
Technical Explanation
The paper aims to characterize the best possible approximation of a probability density function (PDF) using a finite Gaussian mixture model (GMM). Specifically, the authors derive upper and lower bounds on the Hellinger distance between the target PDF and the best Gaussian mixture approximation.
The key technical results are:
- An upper bound on the Hellinger distance that depends on the smoothness and decay properties of the target PDF.
- A matching lower bound that shows the upper bound is tight up to constant factors.
- Comparisons to previous work, highlighting how the new bounds improve upon or generalize existing results.
The analysis involves carefully bounding the approximation error introduced by fitting a finite Gaussian mixture to an arbitrary target PDF. This requires understanding the tradeoffs between the number of mixture components, the complexity of the target, and the resulting approximation quality.
The theoretical insights gained from this work can inform practical algorithms for density estimation and posterior inference in a wide range of applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of the best possible approximation of a probability density function using finite Gaussian mixtures. The authors' technical results are rigorous and the comparisons to prior work are insightful.
One potential limitation is that the analysis assumes the target PDF satisfies certain smoothness and decay conditions. While these conditions hold for many common probability distributions, there may be cases where the target is not well-approximated by this model. Further research could explore relaxing these assumptions or considering alternative approximation methods.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the Hellinger distance as the metric of interest. Other distance measures, such as the Kullback-Leibler divergence or total variation distance, may be relevant in different application contexts. Extending the analysis to these alternative distance measures could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the approximation problem.
Overall, this work makes an important contribution to the theoretical foundations of density estimation using finite Gaussian mixtures. The insights gained can inform the design of practical algorithms and inspire further research in this active area of machine learning and statistics.
Conclusion
This paper provides a detailed theoretical analysis of the best possible approximation of a probability density function using a finite Gaussian mixture model. The authors derive tight upper and lower bounds on the Hellinger distance between the target PDF and the optimal Gaussian mixture approximation, shedding light on the fundamental tradeoffs involved in this density estimation problem.
The results have implications for a wide range of applications where accurate density estimation is crucial, such as truncated density estimation, particle-based optimization, and Bayesian posterior inference. By characterizing the inherent limits of finite Gaussian mixture approximations, this work lays the groundwork for developing more effective and principled density estimation algorithms.
The paper's technical contributions build upon and generalize previous results in this area, showcasing the authors' deep understanding of the problem and the mathematical tools required to analyze it. While the analysis relies on certain smoothness assumptions about the target PDF, the insights gained can inform future research on relaxing these conditions or exploring alternative approximation methods.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the theoretical understanding of density estimation using finite Gaussian mixtures, with potential impacts across machine learning, statistics, and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Learning general Gaussian mixtures with efficient score matching
Sitan Chen, Vasilis Kontonis, Kulin Shah
0
0
We study the problem of learning mixtures of $k$ Gaussians in $d$ dimensions. We make no separation assumptions on the underlying mixture components: we only require that the covariance matrices have bounded condition number and that the means and covariances lie in a ball of bounded radius. We give an algorithm that draws $d^{mathrm{poly}(k/varepsilon)}$ samples from the target mixture, runs in sample-polynomial time, and constructs a sampler whose output distribution is $varepsilon$-far from the unknown mixture in total variation. Prior works for this problem either (i) required exponential runtime in the dimension $d$, (ii) placed strong assumptions on the instance (e.g., spherical covariances or clusterability), or (iii) had doubly exponential dependence on the number of components $k$. Our approach departs from commonly used techniques for this problem like the method of moments. Instead, we leverage a recently developed reduction, based on diffusion models, from distribution learning to a supervised learning task called score matching. We give an algorithm for the latter by proving a structural result showing that the score function of a Gaussian mixture can be approximated by a piecewise-polynomial function, and there is an efficient algorithm for finding it. To our knowledge, this is the first example of diffusion models achieving a state-of-the-art theoretical guarantee for an unsupervised learning task.
4/30/2024
🏅
Learning Mixtures of Gaussians Using Diffusion Models
Khashayar Gatmiry, Jonathan Kelner, Holden Lee
0
0
We give a new algorithm for learning mixtures of $k$ Gaussians (with identity covariance in $mathbb{R}^n$) to TV error $varepsilon$, with quasi-polynomial ($O(n^{text{poly log}left(frac{n+k}{varepsilon}right)})$) time and sample complexity, under a minimum weight assumption. Unlike previous approaches, most of which are algebraic in nature, our approach is analytic and relies on the framework of diffusion models. Diffusion models are a modern paradigm for generative modeling, which typically rely on learning the score function (gradient log-pdf) along a process transforming a pure noise distribution, in our case a Gaussian, to the data distribution. Despite their dazzling performance in tasks such as image generation, there are few end-to-end theoretical guarantees that they can efficiently learn nontrivial families of distributions; we give some of the first such guarantees. We proceed by deriving higher-order Gaussian noise sensitivity bounds for the score functions for a Gaussian mixture to show that that they can be inductively learned using piecewise polynomial regression (up to poly-logarithmic degree), and combine this with known convergence results for diffusion models. Our results extend to continuous mixtures of Gaussians where the mixing distribution is supported on a union of $k$ balls of constant radius. In particular, this applies to the case of Gaussian convolutions of distributions on low-dimensional manifolds, or more generally sets with small covering number.
4/30/2024
📉
Mixtures of Gaussians are Privately Learnable with a Polynomial Number of Samples
Mohammad Afzali, Hassan Ashtiani, Christopher Liaw
0
0
We study the problem of estimating mixtures of Gaussians under the constraint of differential privacy (DP). Our main result is that $text{poly}(k,d,1/alpha,1/varepsilon,log(1/delta))$ samples are sufficient to estimate a mixture of $k$ Gaussians in $mathbb{R}^d$ up to total variation distance $alpha$ while satisfying $(varepsilon, delta)$-DP. This is the first finite sample complexity upper bound for the problem that does not make any structural assumptions on the GMMs. To solve the problem, we devise a new framework which may be useful for other tasks. On a high level, we show that if a class of distributions (such as Gaussians) is (1) list decodable and (2) admits a locally small'' cover (Bun et al., 2021) with respect to total variation distance, then the class of its mixtures is privately learnable. The proof circumvents a known barrier indicating that, unlike Gaussians, GMMs do not admit a locally small cover (Aden-Ali et al., 2021b).
4/24/2024
On Parameter Estimation in Deviated Gaussian Mixture of Experts
Huy Nguyen, Khai Nguyen, Nhat Ho
0
0
We consider the parameter estimation problem in the deviated Gaussian mixture of experts in which the data are generated from $(1 - lambda^{ast}) g_0(Y| X)+ lambda^{ast} sum_{i = 1}^{k_{ast}} p_{i}^{ast} f(Y|(a_{i}^{ast})^{top}X+b_i^{ast},sigma_{i}^{ast})$, where $X, Y$ are respectively a covariate vector and a response variable, $g_{0}(Y|X)$ is a known function, $lambda^{ast} in [0, 1]$ is true but unknown mixing proportion, and $(p_{i}^{ast}, a_{i}^{ast}, b_{i}^{ast}, sigma_{i}^{ast})$ for $1 leq i leq k^{ast}$ are unknown parameters of the Gaussian mixture of experts. This problem arises from the goodness-of-fit test when we would like to test whether the data are generated from $g_{0}(Y|X)$ (null hypothesis) or they are generated from the whole mixture (alternative hypothesis). Based on the algebraic structure of the expert functions and the distinguishability between $g_0$ and the mixture part, we construct novel Voronoi-based loss functions to capture the convergence rates of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for our models. We further demonstrate that our proposed loss functions characterize the local convergence rates of parameter estimation more accurately than the generalized Wasserstein, a loss function being commonly used for estimating parameters in the Gaussian mixture of experts.
6/26/2024