Beyond the Hype: A Cautionary Tale of ChatGPT in the Programming Classroom

Overview

• The paper explores the use of ChatGPT, a large language model, in the field of information systems (IS) and computer science (CS) education.
• It investigates how ChatGPT can be used to complete programming exercises and assignments, and the potential impact on teaching and learning.
• The paper provides insights for academics on creating more challenging exercises and using ChatGPT responsibly to maintain classroom integrity.

Plain English Explanation

The use of AI models like ChatGPT has become increasingly common in academic settings, particularly for completing programming exercises and assignments in IS and CS courses. However, recent research suggests that the use of ChatGPT in academia may be problematic and requires further examination.

The paper aims to understand how ChatGPT can be used in practice for code (programming) writing tasks, and provide guidance for academics on how to adapt their teaching approaches. The researchers used Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) theory as a framework to analyze the dynamics of using ChatGPT in a classroom setting, drawing insights from code demonstrations and comparisons with tutor/lecturer-created memos.

The findings highlight common assessment methods, programming errors made by ChatGPT, and considerations for IS academics to ensure students develop critical programming skills. The paper offers practical suggestions on how to transform the challenges of using ChatGPT in the classroom into opportunities for learning and growth.

Technical Explanation

The researchers used CAS theory as a theoretical guide to understand the dynamics of using ChatGPT in a university setting. They analyzed various programming examples from past IS exercises and compared them to memos created by tutors and lecturers.

The analysis revealed common assessment methods used by instructors, as well as programming errors made by ChatGPT. The researchers provide insights for IS academics on how to create more challenging exercises and engage responsibly with ChatGPT to promote classroom integrity.

The paper also explores the potential impact of ChatGPT on teaching and learning, particularly in terms of the development of critical programming skills among students. The researchers suggest that the use of ChatGPT in data visualization assignments may be an area for further investigation.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the practical use of ChatGPT in IS and CS education, but it also acknowledges the need for further research on the long-term implications of such technology on teaching and learning.

One potential limitation of the study is the focus on a single language model, ChatGPT. As language models continue to evolve, it will be important to consider how other AI tools may impact programming education.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the ethical considerations surrounding the use of ChatGPT in academic settings, such as issues of academic integrity and the potential for cheating. These are important areas that warrant further exploration.

Conclusion

This paper provides a timely and relevant analysis of the use of ChatGPT in IS and CS education. It highlights the need for academics to adapt their teaching practices to address the challenges posed by large language models, while also recognizing the potential opportunities for enhancing programming education.

The insights offered in this research can help inform the development of more effective and ethical approaches to integrating AI tools like ChatGPT into the classroom, ultimately supporting the growth and development of critical programming skills among students.