ChatGPT in Classrooms: Transforming Challenges into Opportunities in Education
2405.10645
0
0
📉
Abstract
In the era of exponential technology growth, one unexpected guest has claimed a seat in classrooms worldwide, Artificial Intelligence. Generative AI, such as ChatGPT, promises a revolution in education, yet it arrives with a double-edged sword. Its potential for personalized learning is offset by issues of cheating, inaccuracies, and educators struggling to incorporate it effectively into their lesson design. We are standing on the brink of this educational frontier, and it is clear that we need to navigate this terrain with a lot of care. This is a major challenge that could undermine the integrity and value of our educational process. So, how can we turn these challenges into opportunities? When used inappropriately, AI tools can become the perfect tool for the cut copy paste mentality, and quickly begin to corrode critical thinking, creativity, and deep understanding, the most important skills in our rapidly changing world. Teachers feel that they are not equipped to leverage this technology, widening the digital divide among educators and institutions. Addressing these concerns calls for an in depth research approach. We will employ empirical research, drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model, to assess the attitudes toward generative AI among educators and students. Understanding their perceptions, usage patterns, and hurdles is the first crucial step in creating an effective solution. The present study will be used as a process manual for future researchers to apply, running their own data, based on the steps explained here
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Generative AI, like ChatGPT, is becoming a prominent presence in classrooms worldwide, promising to revolutionize education.
- However, this technology also comes with significant challenges, such as issues with cheating, inaccuracies, and educators struggling to effectively incorporate it into their lesson design.
- Researchers aim to better understand the attitudes, perceptions, and usage patterns of both educators and students towards generative AI, in order to create effective solutions to these challenges.
Plain English Explanation
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly advancing, and one of its newest forms, called generative AI, has made its way into classrooms around the world. Tools like ChatGPT have the potential to greatly improve personalized learning for students. However, this technology also comes with some significant downsides.
For example, students could use these AI tools to cheat on assignments or copy content instead of doing their own work. There are also concerns about the accuracy of the information these AI systems provide. Additionally, many teachers feel they don't have the skills to properly use and integrate this technology into their lesson plans.
To address these challenges, researchers want to better understand how both teachers and students feel about generative AI, how they are using it, and what obstacles they are facing. This information is crucial for developing effective solutions that can help harness the benefits of AI in education while mitigating the risks.
By conducting in-depth research and gathering empirical data, the researchers hope to create a roadmap that future studies can follow to continue exploring this important issue. The goal is to find ways to turn the challenges of AI in education into opportunities that can truly improve the learning experience for everyone involved.
Technical Explanation
The researchers plan to employ the Technology Acceptance Model to assess the attitudes and perceptions of both educators and students towards generative AI. This model is designed to help understand the factors that influence the adoption and use of new technologies.
By collecting data on how teachers and students are currently using these AI tools, as well as the barriers they face, the researchers hope to gain valuable insights. This information will be crucial for developing effective strategies and best practices for incorporating generative AI into the educational process in a responsible and beneficial way.
The study will serve as a "process manual" for future researchers, providing a detailed roadmap for how to conduct their own investigations on this topic. This will help ensure that the findings are not limited to a single institution or geographic region, but can be applied more broadly to the education sector as a whole.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge the significant challenges that come with the rise of generative AI in education, such as the potential for cheating, inaccuracies, and the digital divide among educators. These are all valid concerns that need to be carefully addressed.
One potential limitation of the study is that it relies on self-reported data from teachers and students, which can be subject to bias. It would be valuable to also incorporate more objective measures, such as analyzing actual student work or classroom observations, to get a more comprehensive understanding of how these AI tools are being used in practice.
Additionally, the study does not delve into the ethical implications of generative AI in education, such as issues of privacy, bias, and the potential for these tools to exacerbate existing inequalities. These are important considerations that should be explored in future research.
Overall, the researchers have identified a critical issue that deserves in-depth investigation. By taking a systematic, empirical approach, they can provide valuable insights to help educators, policymakers, and the broader public navigate the complex and rapidly evolving landscape of AI in education.
Conclusion
As generative AI, exemplified by tools like ChatGPT, continues to permeate the education system, it is crucial that we understand the perspectives and experiences of both teachers and students. This research aims to shed light on the challenges and opportunities presented by this technology, with the ultimate goal of finding ways to harness its potential while mitigating the risks.
By applying a well-established framework like the Technology Acceptance Model, the researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the factors that influence the adoption and use of generative AI in classrooms. This knowledge can then be used to develop effective strategies and best practices that empower educators to integrate these tools in a way that enhances learning, fosters critical thinking, and maintains the integrity of the educational process.
As we navigate this frontier of technological advancement in education, it is clear that a thoughtful and collaborative approach is essential. The insights gained from this study can serve as a valuable guide for future researchers and practitioners, helping to ensure that the integration of generative AI leads to positive and sustainable outcomes for students, teachers, and society as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌐
ChatGPT Is Here to Help, Not to Replace Anybody -- An Evaluation of Students' Opinions On Integrating ChatGPT In CS Courses
Bruno Pereira Cipriano, Pedro Alves
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT and Bard are capable of producing code based on textual descriptions, with remarkable efficacy. Such technology will have profound implications for computing education, raising concerns about cheating, excessive dependence, and a decline in computational thinking skills, among others. There has been extensive research on how teachers should handle this challenge but it is also important to understand how students feel about this paradigm shift. In this research, 52 first-year CS students were surveyed in order to assess their views on technologies with code-generation capabilities, both from academic and professional perspectives. Our findings indicate that while students generally favor the academic use of GPT, they don't over rely on it, only mildly asking for its help. Although most students benefit from GPT, some struggle to use it effectively, urging the need for specific GPT training. Opinions on GPT's impact on their professional lives vary, but there is a consensus on its importance in academic practice.
4/29/2024
The Evolution of Learning: Assessing the Transformative Impact of Generative AI on Higher Education
Stefanie Krause, Bhumi Hitesh Panchal, Nikhil Ubhe
0
0
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) models such as ChatGPT have experienced a surge in popularity, attracting 100 million active users in 2 months and generating an estimated 10 million daily queries. Despite this remarkable adoption, there remains a limited understanding to which extent this innovative technology influences higher education. This research paper investigates the impact of GAI on university students and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). The study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining a comprehensive survey with scenario analysis to explore potential benefits, drawbacks, and transformative changes the new technology brings. Using an online survey with 130 participants we assessed students' perspectives and attitudes concerning present ChatGPT usage in academics. Results show that students use the current technology for tasks like assignment writing and exam preparation and believe it to be a effective help in achieving academic goals. The scenario analysis afterwards projected potential future scenarios, providing valuable insights into the possibilities and challenges associated with incorporating GAI into higher education. The main motivation is to gain a tangible and precise understanding of the potential consequences for HEIs and to provide guidance responding to the evolving learning environment. The findings indicate that irresponsible and excessive use of the technology could result in significant challenges. Hence, HEIs must develop stringent policies, reevaluate learning objectives, upskill their lecturers, adjust the curriculum and reconsider examination approaches.
4/17/2024
📈
Beyond the Hype: A Cautionary Tale of ChatGPT in the Programming Classroom
Grant Oosterwyk, Pitso Tsibolane, Popyeni Kautondokwa, Ammar Canani
0
0
Due to the proliferation of Large Language Models research and the use of various Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, the field of information systems (IS) and computer science (CS) has evolved. The use of tools such as ChatGPT to complete various student programming exercises (e.g., in Python) and assignments has gained prominence amongst various academic institutions. However, recent literature has suggested that the use of ChatGPT in academia is problematic and the impact on teaching and learning should be further scrutinized. More specifically, little is known about how ChatGPT can be practically used with code (programming) writing to complete programming exercises amongst IS and CS undergraduate university students. Furthermore, the paper provides insights for academics who teach programming to create more challenging exercises and how to engage responsibly in the use of ChatGPT to promote classroom integrity. In this paper, we used Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) theory as a theoretical guide to understand the various dynamics through classroom code demonstrations. Using ChatGPT 3.5, we analyzed the various practical programming examples from past IS exercises and compared those with memos created by tutors and lecturers in a university setting. This paper highlights common ways of assessment, programming errors created by ChatGPT and the potential consideration for IS academics to ensure the development of critical programming skills among students.
6/18/2024
🌐
Generative AI: The power of the new education
Sergio Altares-L'opez, Jos'e M. Bengochea-Guevara, Carlos Ranz, H'ector Montes, Angela Ribeiro
0
0
The effective integration of generative artificial intelligence in education is a fundamental aspect to prepare future generations. This study proposes an accelerated learning methodology in artificial intelligence, focused on its generative capacity, as a way to achieve this goal. It recognizes the challenge of getting teachers to engage with new technologies and adapt their methods in all subjects, not just those related to AI. This methodology not only promotes interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, but also facilitates student understanding of the ethical uses and risks associated with AI. Students' perceptions of generative AI are examined, addressing their emotions towards its evolution, evaluation of its ethical implications, and everyday use of AI tools. In addition, AI applications commonly used by students and their integration into other disciplines are investigated. The study aims to provide educators with a deeper understanding of students' perceptions of AI and its relevance in society and in their future career paths.
5/24/2024