Beyond the Known: Adversarial Autoencoders in Novelty Detection

Read original: arXiv:2404.04456 - Published 4/9/2024 by Muhammad Asad, Ihsan Ullah, Ganesh Sistu, Michael G. Madden
Total Score

0

🔎

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper focuses on the problem of novelty detection, where the goal is to identify whether a new data point is an inlier (part of the normal distribution) or an outlier.
  • The authors use a deep encoder-decoder network framework to derive a reconstruction error, which is then used to determine a novelty score or as the basis for a one-class classifier.
  • The key contributions of this work are:
    1. Calculating the novelty probability by linearizing the manifold that represents the inlier distribution, allowing for interpretation of the probability in relation to the local coordinates of the manifold tangent space.
    2. Improving the training protocol for the deep network.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers in this study tackled the problem of novelty detection, which is about figuring out if a new piece of data is normal (an "inlier") or unusual (an "outlier"). They used a type of deep neural network called an encoder-decoder network to learn what the normal data looks like. This network can then calculate how different a new data point is from the normal data, which gives a "novelty score" that can be used to classify the new data point as an inlier or an outlier.

The key innovations in this work are:

  1. Manifold Linearization: The researchers found a way to calculate the probability that a new data point is an outlier by looking at the "manifold" (a mathematical concept for the underlying structure) of the normal data. They were able to "linearize" this manifold, which means they could describe it using simple, straight-line relationships. This allowed them to better understand how the probability of a data point being an outlier is related to its position relative to the normal data.

  2. Improved Training: The researchers also found a better way to train the deep neural network to learn the normal data distribution. This improved the network's ability to accurately identify outliers.

Overall, this work advances the state-of-the-art in novelty detection by providing a more interpretable and effective approach compared to previous methods.

Technical Explanation

The authors of this paper tackle the problem of novelty detection, where the goal is to determine whether a new data point should be classified as an inlier (belonging to the normal data distribution) or an outlier. They use a deep encoder-decoder network framework, similar to recent approaches, to derive a reconstruction error that can be used as the basis for a novelty score or a one-class classifier.

The key contributions of this work are:

  1. Manifold Linearization: The authors compute the novelty probability by linearizing the manifold that holds the structure of the inlier distribution. This allows them to interpret how the probability is distributed and can be determined in relation to the local coordinates of the manifold tangent space. This provides a more interpretable approach compared to previous methods that solely relied on reconstruction error.

  2. Improved Training Protocol: The authors also propose an improved training protocol for the deep network. This enhancement to the training process leads to better performance in learning the target class distribution, which in turn results in improved novelty detection capabilities.

The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark datasets and demonstrate that it outperforms recent state-of-the-art methods in novelty detection. This work represents an advancement in interpreting the latent representations of deep models and shows how such interpretability can be leveraged to enhance anomaly detection performance.

Critical Analysis

The authors have provided a well-designed and thorough evaluation of their novelty detection approach, testing it on multiple benchmark datasets and comparing it to recent state-of-the-art methods. The key strengths of this work are the innovative manifold linearization technique and the improved training protocol, both of which contribute to the enhanced performance.

However, the authors do not discuss any potential limitations or caveats of their approach. For example, it would be helpful to understand how the method scales to high-dimensional or complex data distributions, or how it might perform in the presence of noisy or incomplete training data. Additionally, the authors could have provided more insight into the interpretability of the learned manifold representation and how it can be leveraged for further analysis or understanding of the data.

Overall, this research represents a valuable contribution to the field of novelty detection, and the authors' focus on improving both the interpretability and the effectiveness of the approach is commendable. Further research could explore the application of these techniques to other anomaly detection problems or investigate ways to extend the manifold linearization concept to more complex data structures.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a novel approach to the problem of novelty detection, where the goal is to identify whether a new data point is an inlier or an outlier. The key contributions of this work are the use of a manifold linearization technique to calculate the novelty probability, and an improved training protocol for the deep encoder-decoder network.

The authors demonstrate that their approach outperforms recent state-of-the-art methods on several benchmark datasets, and the interpretability of the manifold linearization represents an important step forward in understanding the latent representations learned by deep models. This research has the potential to drive further advancements in anomaly detection and model interpretability, with applications in a wide range of domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔎

Total Score

0

Beyond the Known: Adversarial Autoencoders in Novelty Detection

Muhammad Asad, Ihsan Ullah, Ganesh Sistu, Michael G. Madden

In novelty detection, the goal is to decide if a new data point should be categorized as an inlier or an outlier, given a training dataset that primarily captures the inlier distribution. Recent approaches typically use deep encoder and decoder network frameworks to derive a reconstruction error, and employ this error either to determine a novelty score, or as the basis for a one-class classifier. In this research, we use a similar framework but with a lightweight deep network, and we adopt a probabilistic score with reconstruction error. Our methodology calculates the probability of whether the sample comes from the inlier distribution or not. This work makes two key contributions. The first is that we compute the novelty probability by linearizing the manifold that holds the structure of the inlier distribution. This allows us to interpret how the probability is distributed and can be determined in relation to the local coordinates of the manifold tangent space. The second contribution is that we improve the training protocol for the network. Our results indicate that our approach is effective at learning the target class, and it outperforms recent state-of-the-art methods on several benchmark datasets.

Read more

4/9/2024

Universal Novelty Detection Through Adaptive Contrastive Learning
Total Score

0

Universal Novelty Detection Through Adaptive Contrastive Learning

Hossein Mirzaei, Mojtaba Nafez, Mohammad Jafari, Mohammad Bagher Soltani, Mohammad Azizmalayeri, Jafar Habibi, Mohammad Sabokrou, Mohammad Hossein Rohban

Novelty detection is a critical task for deploying machine learning models in the open world. A crucial property of novelty detection methods is universality, which can be interpreted as generalization across various distributions of training or test data. More precisely, for novelty detection, distribution shifts may occur in the training set or the test set. Shifts in the training set refer to cases where we train a novelty detector on a new dataset and expect strong transferability. Conversely, distribution shifts in the test set indicate the methods' performance when the trained model encounters a shifted test sample. We experimentally show that existing methods falter in maintaining universality, which stems from their rigid inductive biases. Motivated by this, we aim for more generalized techniques that have more adaptable inductive biases. In this context, we leverage the fact that contrastive learning provides an efficient framework to easily switch and adapt to new inductive biases through the proper choice of augmentations in forming the negative pairs. We propose a novel probabilistic auto-negative pair generation method AutoAugOOD, along with contrastive learning, to yield a universal novelty detector method. Our experiments demonstrate the superiority of our method under different distribution shifts in various image benchmark datasets. Notably, our method emerges universality in the lens of adaptability to different setups of novelty detection, including one-class, unlabeled multi-class, and labeled multi-class settings. Code: https://github.com/mojtaba-nafez/UNODE

Read more

8/21/2024

Can I trust my anomaly detection system? A case study based on explainable AI
Total Score

0

Can I trust my anomaly detection system? A case study based on explainable AI

Muhammad Rashid, Elvio Amparore, Enrico Ferrari, Damiano Verda

Generative models based on variational autoencoders are a popular technique for detecting anomalies in images in a semi-supervised context. A common approach employs the anomaly score to detect the presence of anomalies, and it is known to reach high level of accuracy on benchmark datasets. However, since anomaly scores are computed from reconstruction disparities, they often obscure the detection of various spurious features, raising concerns regarding their actual efficacy. This case study explores the robustness of an anomaly detection system based on variational autoencoder generative models through the use of eXplainable AI methods. The goal is to get a different perspective on the real performances of anomaly detectors that use reconstruction differences. In our case study we discovered that, in many cases, samples are detected as anomalous for the wrong or misleading factors.

Read more

7/30/2024

Total Score

0

Reconstruction Error-based Anomaly Detection with Few Outlying Examples

Fabrizio Angiulli, Fabio Fassetti, Luca Ferragina

Reconstruction error-based neural architectures constitute a classical deep learning approach to anomaly detection which has shown great performances. It consists in training an Autoencoder to reconstruct a set of examples deemed to represent the normality and then to point out as anomalies those data that show a sufficiently large reconstruction error. Unfortunately, these architectures often become able to well reconstruct also the anomalies in the data. This phenomenon is more evident when there are anomalies in the training set. In particular when these anomalies are labeled, a setting called semi-supervised, the best way to train Autoencoders is to ignore anomalies and minimize the reconstruction error on normal data. The goal of this work is to investigate approaches to allow reconstruction error-based architectures to instruct the model to put known anomalies outside of the domain description of the normal data. Specifically, our strategy exploits a limited number of anomalous examples to increase the contrast between the reconstruction error associated with normal examples and those associated with both known and unknown anomalies, thus enhancing anomaly detection performances. The experiments show that this new procedure achieves better performances than the standard Autoencoder approach and the main deep learning techniques for semi-supervised anomaly detection.

Read more

6/6/2024