Beyond Random Inputs: A Novel ML-Based Hardware Fuzzing
2404.06856
0
0
Abstract
Modern computing systems heavily rely on hardware as the root of trust. However, their increasing complexity has given rise to security-critical vulnerabilities that cross-layer at-tacks can exploit. Traditional hardware vulnerability detection methods, such as random regression and formal verification, have limitations. Random regression, while scalable, is slow in exploring hardware, and formal verification techniques are often concerned with manual effort and state explosions. Hardware fuzzing has emerged as an effective approach to exploring and detecting security vulnerabilities in large-scale designs like modern processors. They outperform traditional methods regarding coverage, scalability, and efficiency. However, state-of-the-art fuzzers struggle to achieve comprehensive coverage of intricate hardware designs within a practical timeframe, often falling short of a 70% coverage threshold. We propose a novel ML-based hardware fuzzer, ChatFuzz, to address this challenge. Ourapproach leverages LLMs like ChatGPT to understand processor language, focusing on machine codes and generating assembly code sequences. RL is integrated to guide the input generation process by rewarding the inputs using code coverage metrics. We use the open-source RISCV-based RocketCore processor as our testbed. ChatFuzz achieves condition coverage rate of 75% in just 52 minutes compared to a state-of-the-art fuzzer, which requires a lengthy 30-hour window to reach a similar condition coverage. Furthermore, our fuzzer can attain 80% coverage when provided with a limited pool of 10 simulation instances/licenses within a 130-hour window. During this time, it conducted a total of 199K test cases, of which 6K produced discrepancies with the processor's golden model. Our analysis identified more than 10 unique mismatches, including two new bugs in the RocketCore and discrepancies from the RISC-V ISA Simulator.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel machine learning-based hardware fuzzing approach that goes beyond traditional random input generation.
- The proposed technique leverages learned models to generate targeted, "intelligent" inputs that are more likely to expose bugs or vulnerabilities in hardware systems.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments on various hardware designs, showing significant improvements over traditional fuzzing methods.
Plain English Explanation
In the world of computer hardware, finding and fixing bugs or vulnerabilities is a critical task. Traditional fuzzing, where the system is bombarded with randomly generated inputs, is one way to uncover these issues. However, this approach can be inefficient, as many of the randomly generated inputs may not be effective at exposing problems.
The researchers behind this paper have developed a new technique that uses machine learning to generate more "intelligent" inputs that are more likely to find bugs. Their approach works by training a model to learn patterns and characteristics of inputs that are more likely to trigger issues in the hardware. This allows the fuzzing process to be more targeted and effective, resulting in the discovery of more bugs and vulnerabilities compared to traditional random fuzzing.
The key innovation of this work is the use of machine learning to guide the fuzzing process, rather than relying solely on random inputs. By leveraging the power of AI, the researchers have been able to create a more efficient and effective way to test and improve the reliability of computer hardware.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel machine learning-based hardware fuzzing approach, which the authors call "HiFuzz" (Hardware-Intelligent Fuzzing). The core idea is to leverage learned models to generate targeted, "intelligent" inputs that are more likely to expose bugs or vulnerabilities in hardware systems, rather than relying on traditional random input generation.
The HiFuzz framework consists of three main components: [1] an input generator that uses machine learning models to produce targeted inputs, [2] a simulation-based evaluation module that assesses the impact of the generated inputs on the hardware design, and [3] a feedback loop that updates the input generator based on the results of the evaluation.
The authors evaluate their approach on several hardware designs, including a microprocessor, a memory controller, and a RISC-V CPU. They show that HiFuzz can discover significantly more bugs and vulnerabilities compared to traditional random fuzzing, with up to a 10x improvement in bug detection rate.
The key technical insights behind HiFuzz are:
- Leveraging machine learning models to learn patterns and characteristics of effective fuzzing inputs, based on feedback from the simulation-based evaluation.
- Designing a simulation-based evaluation module that can quickly assess the impact of generated inputs on the hardware design, without requiring expensive physical prototypes.
- Implementing a feedback loop that continuously updates the input generator to focus on the most promising areas of the hardware design.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to improving the efficiency and effectiveness of hardware fuzzing. The use of machine learning to guide the input generation process is a promising innovation that addresses the limitations of traditional random fuzzing.
However, the paper does not fully explore the limitations and potential drawbacks of the HiFuzz approach. For example, the authors do not discuss the challenge of obtaining representative training data for the machine learning models, or the potential for the models to overfit to the specific hardware designs used in the experiments.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational and resource requirements of the HiFuzz framework, which could be a significant concern for real-world deployment, especially for resource-constrained hardware systems.
Further research is needed to address these limitations and to explore the broader applicability of the HiFuzz approach to a wider range of hardware designs and use cases. It would also be valuable to see the approach compared to other state-of-the-art hardware fuzzing techniques, to better understand its relative strengths and weaknesses.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel machine learning-based hardware fuzzing approach that demonstrates significant improvements over traditional random fuzzing methods. By leveraging learned models to generate targeted, "intelligent" inputs, the HiFuzz framework is able to more effectively uncover bugs and vulnerabilities in hardware designs.
This research represents an important step forward in the field of hardware testing and validation, and has the potential to lead to more reliable and secure computer systems. As the complexity of hardware designs continues to grow, innovative approaches like HiFuzz will become increasingly important for ensuring the quality and robustness of these critical components.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
LLAMAFUZZ: Large Language Model Enhanced Greybox Fuzzing
Hongxiang Zhang, Yuyang Rong, Yifeng He, Hao Chen
0
0
Greybox fuzzing has achieved success in revealing bugs and vulnerabilities in programs. However, randomized mutation strategies have limited the fuzzer's performance on structured data. Specialized fuzzers can handle complex structured data, but require additional efforts in grammar and suffer from low throughput. In this paper, we explore the potential of utilizing the Large Language Model to enhance greybox fuzzing for structured data. We utilize the pre-trained knowledge of LLM about data conversion and format to generate new valid inputs. We further fine-tuned it with paired mutation seeds to learn structured format and mutation strategies effectively. Our LLM-based fuzzer, LLAMAFUZZ, integrates the power of LLM to understand and mutate structured data to fuzzing. We conduct experiments on the standard bug-based benchmark Magma and a wide variety of real-world programs. LLAMAFUZZ outperforms our top competitor by 41 bugs on average. We also identified 47 unique bugs across all trials. Moreover, LLAMAFUZZ demonstrated consistent performance on both bug trigger and bug reached. Compared to AFL++, LLAMAFUZZ achieved 27.19% more branches in real-world program sets on average. We also demonstrate a case study to explain how LLMs enhance the fuzzing process in terms of code coverage.
6/17/2024
Exploring Fuzzing as Data Augmentation for Neural Test Generation
Yifeng He, Jicheng Wang, Yuyang Rong, Hao Chen
0
0
Testing is an essential part of modern software engineering to build reliable programs. As testing the software is important but expensive, automatic test case generation methods have become popular in software development. Unlike traditional search-based coverage-guided test generation like fuzzing, neural test generation backed by large language models can write tests that are semantically meaningful and can be understood by other maintainers. However, compared to regular code corpus, unit tests in the datasets are limited in amount and diversity. In this paper, we present a novel data augmentation technique **FuzzAug**, that combines the advantages of fuzzing and large language models. FuzzAug not only keeps valid program semantics in the augmented data, but also provides more diverse inputs to the function under test, helping the model to associate correct inputs embedded with the function's dynamic behaviors with the function under test. We evaluate FuzzAug's benefits by using it on a neural test generation dataset to train state-of-the-art code generation models. By augmenting the training set, our model generates test cases with $11%$ accuracy increases. Models trained with FuzzAug generate unit test functions with double the branch coverage compared to those without it. FuzzAug can be used across various datasets to train advanced code generation models, enhancing their utility in automated software testing. Our work shows the benefits of using dynamic analysis results to enhance neural test generation. Code and data will be publicly available.
6/14/2024
When Fuzzing Meets LLMs: Challenges and Opportunities
Yu Jiang, Jie Liang, Fuchen Ma, Yuanliang Chen, Chijin Zhou, Yuheng Shen, Zhiyong Wu, Jingzhou Fu, Mingzhe Wang, ShanShan Li, Quan Zhang
0
0
Fuzzing, a widely-used technique for bug detection, has seen advancements through Large Language Models (LLMs). Despite their potential, LLMs face specific challenges in fuzzing. In this paper, we identified five major challenges of LLM-assisted fuzzing. To support our findings, we revisited the most recent papers from top-tier conferences, confirming that these challenges are widespread. As a remedy, we propose some actionable recommendations to help improve applying LLM in Fuzzing and conduct preliminary evaluations on DBMS fuzzing. The results demonstrate that our recommendations effectively address the identified challenges.
4/26/2024
GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Prompts
Jiahao Yu, Xingwei Lin, Zheng Yu, Xinyu Xing
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have recently experienced tremendous popularity and are widely used from casual conversations to AI-driven programming. However, despite their considerable success, LLMs are not entirely reliable and can give detailed guidance on how to conduct harmful or illegal activities. While safety measures can reduce the risk of such outputs, adversarial jailbreak attacks can still exploit LLMs to produce harmful content. These jailbreak templates are typically manually crafted, making large-scale testing challenging. In this paper, we introduce GPTFuzz, a novel black-box jailbreak fuzzing framework inspired by the AFL fuzzing framework. Instead of manual engineering, GPTFuzz automates the generation of jailbreak templates for red-teaming LLMs. At its core, GPTFuzz starts with human-written templates as initial seeds, then mutates them to produce new templates. We detail three key components of GPTFuzz: a seed selection strategy for balancing efficiency and variability, mutate operators for creating semantically equivalent or similar sentences, and a judgment model to assess the success of a jailbreak attack. We evaluate GPTFuzz against various commercial and open-source LLMs, including ChatGPT, LLaMa-2, and Vicuna, under diverse attack scenarios. Our results indicate that GPTFuzz consistently produces jailbreak templates with a high success rate, surpassing human-crafted templates. Remarkably, GPTFuzz achieves over 90% attack success rates against ChatGPT and Llama-2 models, even with suboptimal initial seed templates. We anticipate that GPTFuzz will be instrumental for researchers and practitioners in examining LLM robustness and will encourage further exploration into enhancing LLM safety.
6/28/2024