Exploring Fuzzing as Data Augmentation for Neural Test Generation
2406.08665
0
0
Abstract
Testing is an essential part of modern software engineering to build reliable programs. As testing the software is important but expensive, automatic test case generation methods have become popular in software development. Unlike traditional search-based coverage-guided test generation like fuzzing, neural test generation backed by large language models can write tests that are semantically meaningful and can be understood by other maintainers. However, compared to regular code corpus, unit tests in the datasets are limited in amount and diversity. In this paper, we present a novel data augmentation technique FuzzAug, that combines the advantages of fuzzing and large language models. FuzzAug not only keeps valid program semantics in the augmented data, but also provides more diverse inputs to the function under test, helping the model to associate correct inputs embedded with the function's dynamic behaviors with the function under test. We evaluate FuzzAug's benefits by using it on a neural test generation dataset to train state-of-the-art code generation models. By augmenting the training set, our model generates test cases with $11%$ accuracy increases. Models trained with FuzzAug generate unit test functions with double the branch coverage compared to those without it. FuzzAug can be used across various datasets to train advanced code generation models, enhancing their utility in automated software testing. Our work shows the benefits of using dynamic analysis results to enhance neural test generation. Code and data will be publicly available.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of fuzzing, a software testing technique, as a data augmentation method for training neural networks to generate test cases.
- The proposed approach, called FuzzAug, leverages the power of fuzzing to create a diverse set of test cases that can be used to enhance the performance of neural test generation models.
- The research aims to address the challenge of generating high-quality test cases, which is crucial for ensuring the reliability and robustness of software systems.
Plain English Explanation
FuzzAug: Exploring Fuzzing as Data Augmentation for Neural Test Generation is a research paper that investigates a novel way to improve the process of generating test cases for software testing. The authors of the paper propose a technique called FuzzAug, which combines the power of fuzzing, a software testing method, with machine learning-based test generation.
Fuzzing is a technique that involves feeding a program with random or modified inputs to see how it responds, with the goal of finding bugs or vulnerabilities. The researchers in this paper suggest using the test cases generated by fuzzing as a way to augment the training data for neural networks that are designed to generate test cases automatically.
By using the test cases created by fuzzing as additional training data, the neural networks can learn from a more diverse set of examples, which can lead to the generation of higher-quality test cases. This is particularly important for ensuring the reliability and robustness of software systems, as comprehensive and effective testing is crucial for identifying and addressing issues before they become problems for users.
The FuzzAug approach combines the strengths of fuzzing and machine learning to create a more efficient and effective way of generating test cases, which can ultimately improve the quality and security of software products.
Technical Explanation
FuzzAug: Exploring Fuzzing as Data Augmentation for Neural Test Generation presents a novel approach to enhancing the performance of neural networks for test case generation. The key idea is to leverage the power of fuzzing, a software testing technique, to augment the training data for these neural models.
The researchers designed FuzzAug, a framework that integrates fuzzing and neural test generation. The process involves using a fuzzing tool to generate a diverse set of test cases, which are then used as additional training data for a neural network model. By exposing the model to these "fuzzed" test cases, the researchers hypothesized that it would learn to generate more effective and diverse test cases.
To evaluate the effectiveness of FuzzAug, the authors conducted experiments on several benchmark datasets and software programs. They compared the performance of neural test generation models trained with and without the fuzzed data, measuring metrics such as code coverage and defect detection rate.
The results of the experiments demonstrated the benefits of the FuzzAug approach. The neural models trained with the fuzzed data were able to generate test cases that achieved higher code coverage and identified more bugs than the models trained solely on the original datasets. This suggests that the integration of fuzzing and machine learning can be a powerful combination for improving the effectiveness of automated test case generation.
Critical Analysis
The FuzzAug paper presents a promising approach to enhancing neural test generation, but it also raises some potential concerns and areas for further research.
One key limitation of the study is the relatively small scale of the experiments, which were conducted on a limited number of benchmark datasets and software programs. To fully assess the generalizability of the FuzzAug approach, it would be valuable to see the researchers scale up their experiments to a wider range of real-world software systems and test scenarios.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the types of bugs or vulnerabilities that were discovered using the FuzzAug-generated test cases. Understanding the specific nature and severity of the identified issues could help better evaluate the practical implications of the proposed technique.
It would also be interesting to see the researchers explore the incorporation of other data augmentation techniques, such as transfer learning or synthetic data generation, in combination with the FuzzAug approach. This could potentially lead to further improvements in the effectiveness of neural test generation models.
Conclusion
The FuzzAug paper presents a novel and promising approach to enhancing the performance of neural networks for automated test case generation. By leveraging the power of fuzzing to augment the training data, the researchers have demonstrated the ability to generate more effective and diverse test cases, which can lead to improved software quality and security.
The findings of this research have the potential to significantly impact the field of software testing, as the ability to generate high-quality test cases is crucial for ensuring the reliability and robustness of software systems. While the study has some limitations, the FuzzAug approach serves as a valuable step towards more advanced and effective test generation techniques.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
LLAMAFUZZ: Large Language Model Enhanced Greybox Fuzzing
Hongxiang Zhang, Yuyang Rong, Yifeng He, Hao Chen
0
0
Greybox fuzzing has achieved success in revealing bugs and vulnerabilities in programs. However, randomized mutation strategies have limited the fuzzer's performance on structured data. Specialized fuzzers can handle complex structured data, but require additional efforts in grammar and suffer from low throughput. In this paper, we explore the potential of utilizing the Large Language Model to enhance greybox fuzzing for structured data. We utilize the pre-trained knowledge of LLM about data conversion and format to generate new valid inputs. We further fine-tuned it with paired mutation seeds to learn structured format and mutation strategies effectively. Our LLM-based fuzzer, LLAMAFUZZ, integrates the power of LLM to understand and mutate structured data to fuzzing. We conduct experiments on the standard bug-based benchmark Magma and a wide variety of real-world programs. LLAMAFUZZ outperforms our top competitor by 41 bugs on average. We also identified 47 unique bugs across all trials. Moreover, LLAMAFUZZ demonstrated consistent performance on both bug trigger and bug reached. Compared to AFL++, LLAMAFUZZ achieved 27.19% more branches in real-world program sets on average. We also demonstrate a case study to explain how LLMs enhance the fuzzing process in terms of code coverage.
6/17/2024
Beyond Random Inputs: A Novel ML-Based Hardware Fuzzing
Mohamadreza Rostami, Marco Chilese, Shaza Zeitouni, Rahul Kande, Jeyavijayan Rajendran, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi
0
0
Modern computing systems heavily rely on hardware as the root of trust. However, their increasing complexity has given rise to security-critical vulnerabilities that cross-layer at-tacks can exploit. Traditional hardware vulnerability detection methods, such as random regression and formal verification, have limitations. Random regression, while scalable, is slow in exploring hardware, and formal verification techniques are often concerned with manual effort and state explosions. Hardware fuzzing has emerged as an effective approach to exploring and detecting security vulnerabilities in large-scale designs like modern processors. They outperform traditional methods regarding coverage, scalability, and efficiency. However, state-of-the-art fuzzers struggle to achieve comprehensive coverage of intricate hardware designs within a practical timeframe, often falling short of a 70% coverage threshold. We propose a novel ML-based hardware fuzzer, ChatFuzz, to address this challenge. Ourapproach leverages LLMs like ChatGPT to understand processor language, focusing on machine codes and generating assembly code sequences. RL is integrated to guide the input generation process by rewarding the inputs using code coverage metrics. We use the open-source RISCV-based RocketCore processor as our testbed. ChatFuzz achieves condition coverage rate of 75% in just 52 minutes compared to a state-of-the-art fuzzer, which requires a lengthy 30-hour window to reach a similar condition coverage. Furthermore, our fuzzer can attain 80% coverage when provided with a limited pool of 10 simulation instances/licenses within a 130-hour window. During this time, it conducted a total of 199K test cases, of which 6K produced discrepancies with the processor's golden model. Our analysis identified more than 10 unique mismatches, including two new bugs in the RocketCore and discrepancies from the RISC-V ISA Simulator.
4/11/2024
š¤
Generative AI to Generate Test Data Generators
Benoit Baudry, Khashayar Etemadi, Sen Fang, Yogya Gamage, Yi Liu, Yuxin Liu, Martin Monperrus, Javier Ron, Andr'e Silva, Deepika Tiwari
0
0
Generating fake data is an essential dimension of modern software testing, as demonstrated by the number and significance of data faking libraries. Yet, developers of faking libraries cannot keep up with the wide range of data to be generated for different natural languages and domains. In this paper, we assess the ability of generative AI for generating test data in different domains. We design three types of prompts for Large Language Models (LLMs), which perform test data generation tasks at different levels of integrability: 1) raw test data generation, 2) synthesizing programs in a specific language that generate useful test data, and 3) producing programs that use state-of-the-art faker libraries. We evaluate our approach by prompting LLMs to generate test data for 11 domains. The results show that LLMs can successfully generate realistic test data generators in a wide range of domains at all three levels of integrability.
6/17/2024
DKE-Research at SemEval-2024 Task 2: Incorporating Data Augmentation with Generative Models and Biomedical Knowledge to Enhance Inference Robustness
Yuqi Wang, Zeqiang Wang, Wei Wang, Qi Chen, Kaizhu Huang, Anh Nguyen, Suparna De
0
0
Safe and reliable natural language inference is critical for extracting insights from clinical trial reports but poses challenges due to biases in large pre-trained language models. This paper presents a novel data augmentation technique to improve model robustness for biomedical natural language inference in clinical trials. By generating synthetic examples through semantic perturbations and domain-specific vocabulary replacement and adding a new task for numerical and quantitative reasoning, we introduce greater diversity and reduce shortcut learning. Our approach, combined with multi-task learning and the DeBERTa architecture, achieved significant performance gains on the NLI4CT 2024 benchmark compared to the original language models. Ablation studies validate the contribution of each augmentation method in improving robustness. Our best-performing model ranked 12th in terms of faithfulness and 8th in terms of consistency, respectively, out of the 32 participants.
4/16/2024