The BIAS Detection Framework: Bias Detection in Word Embeddings and Language Models for European Languages
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents the BIAS detection framework, a system for detecting bias in word embeddings and language models for European languages.
- The framework aims to provide a standardized and comprehensive approach to measuring bias in natural language processing (NLP) models.
- It includes tools for evaluating bias across different dimensions, such as gender, ethnicity, and occupation.
Plain English Explanation
The BIAS detection framework is a system designed to identify biases in language models and word embeddings, which are fundamental components of many natural language processing (NLP) applications. These models can sometimes reflect and amplify societal biases, which can lead to unfair or discriminatory outcomes.
The key idea behind the BIAS framework is to provide a standardized and comprehensive way to measure bias in NLP models, across a variety of dimensions like gender, ethnicity, and occupation. This allows researchers and developers to better understand the biases present in their models and take steps to mitigate them.
The framework includes a suite of tools and benchmarks that can be used to evaluate bias in different language models and embeddings. By having a common set of standards and evaluation methods, it becomes easier to compare the fairness of various NLP systems and work towards more equitable and inclusive AI.
Technical Explanation
The BIAS detection framework is built around a modular architecture that allows for the evaluation of bias across multiple dimensions. It includes a set of bias probing tasks that measure different types of biases, such as gender, ethnicity, and occupation.
The framework also provides standardized datasets for evaluating bias, drawn from a variety of sources and covering multiple European languages. These datasets are designed to be representative of different demographic groups and to capture nuanced aspects of bias.
To quantify bias, the BIAS framework employs a range of bias metrics, including statistical measures of association and fairness indicators. These metrics are used to assess the degree of bias present in the language models and word embeddings being tested.
The framework is implemented as a modular, open-source toolkit that can be easily integrated into the development and evaluation workflows of NLP researchers and practitioners. This promotes the widespread adoption and use of the BIAS framework, helping to advance the field of fair and ethical AI.
Critical Analysis
The BIAS detection framework represents an important step forward in the effort to identify and mitigate bias in natural language processing systems. By providing a standardized and comprehensive approach to bias evaluation, the framework helps to address a critical challenge in the development of fair and inclusive AI.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations of the framework. For example, the bias probing tasks and datasets may not capture all aspects of bias, and the metrics used to quantify bias may not fully capture the nuances of complex social and linguistic phenomena.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential challenges of deploying the BIAS framework in real-world settings. Integrating bias detection into the development lifecycle of NLP models may require significant effort and coordination, and the interpretation of bias metrics can be complex and context-dependent.
Further research is needed to explore the practical implications of the BIAS framework and to develop more robust and comprehensive approaches to bias detection and mitigation in natural language processing.
Conclusion
The BIAS detection framework represents a significant advancement in the field of fair and ethical AI. By providing a standardized and comprehensive approach to measuring bias in language models and word embeddings, the framework helps to raise awareness of the issue of bias in NLP and to promote the development of more inclusive and equitable AI systems.
While the framework has some limitations, it serves as an important tool for researchers and practitioners working to address the challenge of bias in natural language processing. By continuing to refine and expand the BIAS framework, the AI community can make meaningful progress towards the goal of creating AI systems that are fair, inclusive, and beneficial to all.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
The BIAS Detection Framework: Bias Detection in Word Embeddings and Language Models for European Languages
Alexandre Puttick, Leander Rankwiler, Catherine Ikae, Mascha Kurpicz-Briki
The project BIAS: Mitigating Diversity Biases of AI in the Labor Market is a four-year project funded by the European commission and supported by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI). As part of the project, novel bias detection methods to identify societal bias in language models and word embeddings in European languages are developed, with particular attention to linguistic and geographic particularities. This technical report describes the overall architecture and components of the BIAS Detection Framework. The code described in this technical report is available and will be updated and expanded continuously with upcoming results from the BIAS project. The details about the datasets for the different languages are described in corresponding papers at scientific venues.
Read more7/29/2024
0
A Study on Bias Detection and Classification in Natural Language Processing
Ana Sofia Evans, Helena Moniz, Lu'isa Coheur
Human biases have been shown to influence the performance of models and algorithms in various fields, including Natural Language Processing. While the study of this phenomenon is garnering focus in recent years, the available resources are still relatively scarce, often focusing on different forms or manifestations of biases. The aim of our work is twofold: 1) gather publicly-available datasets and determine how to better combine them to effectively train models in the task of hate speech detection and classification; 2) analyse the main issues with these datasets, such as scarcity, skewed resources, and reliance on non-persistent data. We discuss these issues in tandem with the development of our experiments, in which we show that the combinations of different datasets greatly impact the models' performance.
Read more8/15/2024
💬
0
From Prejudice to Parity: A New Approach to Debiasing Large Language Model Word Embeddings
Aishik Rakshit, Smriti Singh, Shuvam Keshari, Arijit Ghosh Chowdhury, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha
Embeddings play a pivotal role in the efficacy of Large Language Models. They are the bedrock on which these models grasp contextual relationships and foster a more nuanced understanding of language and consequently perform remarkably on a plethora of complex tasks that require a fundamental understanding of human language. Given that these embeddings themselves often reflect or exhibit bias, it stands to reason that these models may also inadvertently learn this bias. In this work, we build on the seminal previous work and propose DeepSoftDebias, an algorithm that uses a neural network to perform 'soft debiasing'. We exhaustively evaluate this algorithm across a variety of SOTA datasets, accuracy metrics, and challenging NLP tasks. We find that DeepSoftDebias outperforms the current state-of-the-art methods at reducing bias across gender, race, and religion.
Read more4/17/2024
💬
0
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Isabel O. Gallegos, Ryan A. Rossi, Joe Barrow, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Sungchul Kim, Franck Dernoncourt, Tong Yu, Ruiyi Zhang, Nesreen K. Ahmed
Rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs) have enabled the processing, understanding, and generation of human-like text, with increasing integration into systems that touch our social sphere. Despite this success, these models can learn, perpetuate, and amplify harmful social biases. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for LLMs. We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing, defining distinct facets of harm and introducing several desiderata to operationalize fairness for LLMs. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive taxonomies, two for bias evaluation, namely metrics and datasets, and one for mitigation. Our first taxonomy of metrics for bias evaluation disambiguates the relationship between metrics and evaluation datasets, and organizes metrics by the different levels at which they operate in a model: embeddings, probabilities, and generated text. Our second taxonomy of datasets for bias evaluation categorizes datasets by their structure as counterfactual inputs or prompts, and identifies the targeted harms and social groups; we also release a consolidation of publicly-available datasets for improved access. Our third taxonomy of techniques for bias mitigation classifies methods by their intervention during pre-processing, in-training, intra-processing, and post-processing, with granular subcategories that elucidate research trends. Finally, we identify open problems and challenges for future work. Synthesizing a wide range of recent research, we aim to provide a clear guide of the existing literature that empowers researchers and practitioners to better understand and prevent the propagation of bias in LLMs.
Read more7/16/2024