Blessing or curse? A survey on the Impact of Generative AI on Fake News

2404.03021

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/5/2024 by Alexander Loth, Martin Kappes, Marc-Oliver Pahl

🤖

Abstract

Fake news significantly influence our society. They impact consumers, voters, and many other societal groups. While Fake News exist for a centuries, Generative AI brings fake news on a new level. It is now possible to automate the creation of masses of high-quality individually targeted Fake News. On the other end, Generative AI can also help detecting Fake News. Both fields are young but developing fast. This survey provides a comprehensive examination of the research and practical use of Generative AI for Fake News detection and creation in 2024. Following the Structured Literature Survey approach, the paper synthesizes current results in the following topic clusters 1) enabling technologies, 2) creation of Fake News, 3) case study social media as most relevant distribution channel, 4) detection of Fake News, and 5) deepfakes as upcoming technology. The article also identifies current challenges and open issues.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • This paper examines the impact of generative AI on the spread of fake news.
  • Generative AI models can be used to create highly realistic fake text, images, and media, which could exacerbate the fake news problem.
  • The paper surveys the current state of research on using generative AI for fake news detection and mitigation.

Plain English Explanation

Generative AI is a powerful technology that can create new content that looks and sounds very real. This includes text, images, audio, and videos. While this technology has many beneficial applications, it also has the potential to be misused to spread misinformation and fake news.

Fake news, or intentionally misleading information, is a significant societal problem that can have real-world consequences. Generative AI models could be used to fabricate highly convincing fake news stories, social media posts, and other media at scale. This could make it even harder for people to distinguish fact from fiction online.

The research paper surveys the current approaches for using AI to both generate fake news and to detect and mitigate it. Researchers are exploring ways to harness AI to identify the telltale signs of synthetic content and stop the spread of misinformation. However, the paper also acknowledges that as generative AI capabilities advance, the challenge of combating fake news will only grow more difficult.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a comprehensive review of the research on the intersection of generative AI and fake news. It covers several key areas:

  1. The capabilities of modern generative AI models to create fake text, images, audio, and video content that is difficult to distinguish from real. This includes language models like GPT-3 as well as advanced image and video synthesis techniques.

  2. The use of generative AI for malicious content creation, including the generation of fake news articles, social media posts, and other media designed to mislead and deceive.

  3. Approaches for using AI and machine learning to detect synthetic or fake content, often by identifying subtle patterns and anomalies that distinguish it from genuine information.

  4. Mitigation strategies, including content moderation systems, digital provenance techniques, and public education campaigns to improve media literacy.

The paper surveys a range of technical solutions proposed by researchers, highlighting both the promise and limitations of current approaches. It notes that as generative AI continues to improve, the arms race between fake content creators and detection systems will likely escalate.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a balanced and thorough overview of the complex relationship between generative AI and fake news. It acknowledges the powerful capabilities of these technologies, both for beneficial and malicious uses.

One limitation noted is that many of the fake news detection approaches rely on identifying current telltale signs of synthetic content, which may become less effective as generative models continue to advance. The paper suggests the need for more fundamental breakthroughs in AI safety and robustness to stay ahead of increasingly sophisticated misinformation campaigns.

The paper also highlights the broader societal challenges, such as the need to improve media literacy and online information hygiene. Technological solutions alone may not be sufficient to address the systemic factors that enable the spread of fake news.

Overall, the research provides a valuable snapshot of this rapidly evolving landscape, while underscoring the critical importance of continued work to harness the benefits of generative AI while mitigating its potential misuse.

Conclusion

This paper offers a comprehensive survey of the complex interplay between generative AI and fake news. It demonstrates the powerful capabilities of these technologies to create highly realistic synthetic content, while also highlighting the ongoing research into detection and mitigation strategies.

The findings emphasize the need for a multi-pronged approach, combining technological solutions with broader societal efforts to improve media literacy and online information integrity. As generative AI continues to advance, the challenge of combating fake news will only grow more difficult, requiring sustained attention and innovation from researchers, policymakers, and the public.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Applications

New!Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Applications

Sandeep Singh Sengar, Affan Bin Hasan, Sanjay Kumar, Fiona Carroll

YC

0

Reddit

0

In recent years, the study of artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a paradigm shift. This has been propelled by the groundbreaking capabilities of generative models both in supervised and unsupervised learning scenarios. Generative AI has shown state-of-the-art performance in solving perplexing real-world conundrums in fields such as image translation, medical diagnostics, textual imagery fusion, natural language processing, and beyond. This paper documents the systematic review and analysis of recent advancements and techniques in Generative AI with a detailed discussion of their applications including application-specific models. Indeed, the major impact that generative AI has made to date, has been in language generation with the development of large language models, in the field of image translation and several other interdisciplinary applications of generative AI. Moreover, the primary contribution of this paper lies in its coherent synthesis of the latest advancements in these areas, seamlessly weaving together contemporary breakthroughs in the field. Particularly, how it shares an exploration of the future trajectory for generative AI. In conclusion, the paper ends with a discussion of Responsible AI principles, and the necessary ethical considerations for the sustainability and growth of these generative models.

Read more

5/21/2024

Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Contents (FAIGC): A Survey of Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunities

Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Contents (FAIGC): A Survey of Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunities

Xiaomin Yu, Yezhaohui Wang, Yanfang Chen, Zhen Tao, Dinghao Xi, Shichao Song, Simin Niu, Zhiyu Li

YC

0

Reddit

0

In recent years, generative artificial intelligence models, represented by Large Language Models (LLMs) and Diffusion Models (DMs), have revolutionized content production methods. These artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) have become deeply embedded in various aspects of daily life and work. However, these technologies have also led to the emergence of Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (FAIGC), posing new challenges in distinguishing genuine information. It is crucial to recognize that AIGC technology is akin to a double-edged sword; its potent generative capabilities, while beneficial, also pose risks for the creation and dissemination of FAIGC. In this survey, We propose a new taxonomy that provides a more comprehensive breakdown of the space of FAIGC methods today. Next, we explore the modalities and generative technologies of FAIGC. We introduce FAIGC detection methods and summarize the related benchmark from various perspectives. Finally, we discuss outstanding challenges and promising areas for future research.

Read more

5/6/2024

🔎

Adapting Fake News Detection to the Era of Large Language Models

Jinyan Su, Claire Cardie, Preslav Nakov

YC

0

Reddit

0

In the age of large language models (LLMs) and the widespread adoption of AI-driven content creation, the landscape of information dissemination has witnessed a paradigm shift. With the proliferation of both human-written and machine-generated real and fake news, robustly and effectively discerning the veracity of news articles has become an intricate challenge. While substantial research has been dedicated to fake news detection, this either assumes that all news articles are human-written or abruptly assumes that all machine-generated news are fake. Thus, a significant gap exists in understanding the interplay between machine-(paraphrased) real news, machine-generated fake news, human-written fake news, and human-written real news. In this paper, we study this gap by conducting a comprehensive evaluation of fake news detectors trained in various scenarios. Our primary objectives revolve around the following pivotal question: How to adapt fake news detectors to the era of LLMs? Our experiments reveal an interesting pattern that detectors trained exclusively on human-written articles can indeed perform well at detecting machine-generated fake news, but not vice versa. Moreover, due to the bias of detectors against machine-generated texts cite{su2023fake}, they should be trained on datasets with a lower machine-generated news ratio than the test set. Building on our findings, we provide a practical strategy for the development of robust fake news detectors.

Read more

4/16/2024

🐍

The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making

Valerio Capraro, Austin Lentsch, Daron Acemoglu, Selin Akgun, Aisel Akhmedova, Ennio Bilancini, Jean-Franc{c}ois Bonnefon, Pablo Bra~nas-Garza, Luigi Butera, Karen M. Douglas, Jim A. C. Everett, Gerd Gigerenzer, Christine Greenhow, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Julianne Holt-Lunstad, Jolanda Jetten, Simon Johnson, Chiara Longoni, Pete Lunn, Simone Natale, Iyad Rahwan, Neil Selwyn, Vivek Singh, Siddharth Suri, Jennifer Sutcliffe, Joe Tomlinson, Sander van der Linden, Paul A. M. Van Lange, Friederike Wall, Jay J. Van Bavel, Riccardo Viale

YC

0

Reddit

0

Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.

Read more

5/7/2024