Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Contents (FAIGC): A Survey of Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunities
2405.00711
0
0
Abstract
In recent years, generative artificial intelligence models, represented by Large Language Models (LLMs) and Diffusion Models (DMs), have revolutionized content production methods. These artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) have become deeply embedded in various aspects of daily life and work. However, these technologies have also led to the emergence of Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (FAIGC), posing new challenges in distinguishing genuine information. It is crucial to recognize that AIGC technology is akin to a double-edged sword; its potent generative capabilities, while beneficial, also pose risks for the creation and dissemination of FAIGC. In this survey, We propose a new taxonomy that provides a more comprehensive breakdown of the space of FAIGC methods today. Next, we explore the modalities and generative technologies of FAIGC. We introduce FAIGC detection methods and summarize the related benchmark from various perspectives. Finally, we discuss outstanding challenges and promising areas for future research.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the theories, detection methods, and opportunities related to Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Contents (FAIGC).
- It examines the various types of FAIGC, such as text, images, and videos, and explores the techniques used to create them.
- The paper also discusses the challenges in detecting FAIGC and the potential impacts on society, including bias in AI-generated content, the impact of generative AI, and the role of retrieval-augmented generation in addressing these issues.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the growing problem of Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Contents (FAIGC), which are pieces of content like text, images, or videos that are created using AI systems rather than by human authors. These AI-generated contents can be difficult to distinguish from genuine human-created content, and they can have significant impacts on society.
The paper first explains the different types of FAIGC and the techniques used to create them. For example, language models can be trained to generate convincing text, while generative adversarial networks (GANs) can be used to create realistic-looking images or videos.
The paper then discusses the challenges in detecting FAIGC, such as the constantly evolving nature of the technology and the difficulty in distinguishing AI-generated content from human-created content. It also explores the potential impacts of FAIGC, including the spread of misinformation, the impact on the quality of news and media, and the broader societal implications.
The paper also looks at the role of retrieval-augmented generation in addressing FAIGC, where AI systems can be used to detect and flag potentially fake content. Additionally, the paper explores the quality of AI-generated video content and the challenges in ensuring its visual harmony.
Overall, the paper provides a comprehensive overview of the FAIGC landscape and the various approaches being explored to address this growing challenge.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by defining Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Contents (FAIGC) and providing a taxonomy of the different types of FAIGC, including text, images, and videos. It then discusses the various techniques used to create FAIGC, such as language models for text generation, generative adversarial networks (GANs) for image and video synthesis, and retrieval-augmented generation for combining AI-generated and human-curated content.
The paper then delves into the detection methods for FAIGC, exploring both technical and social approaches. On the technical side, the authors discuss the use of machine learning models to identify the unique signatures of AI-generated content, such as subtle inconsistencies or anomalies. They also highlight the challenges in keeping up with the rapidly evolving nature of FAIGC generation techniques.
From a social perspective, the paper examines the role of human perception and the difficulties in distinguishing AI-generated content from human-created content. It discusses the potential impacts of FAIGC, including the spread of misinformation, biases in AI-generated news content, and the broader societal implications of generative AI.
The paper then explores the potential opportunities and solutions for addressing FAIGC, such as the use of retrieval-augmented generation to combine AI-generated and human-curated content, and the focus on visual harmony in AI-generated video content. The authors also highlight the need for collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and the public to develop effective strategies for combating the spread of FAIGC.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-researched overview of the FAIGC landscape, highlighting the various challenges and opportunities associated with this emerging field. One of the key strengths of the paper is its multidisciplinary approach, which includes both technical and social perspectives on the detection and mitigation of FAIGC.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations in the current state of FAIGC detection methods, particularly in keeping up with the rapidly evolving generation techniques. The authors also note the potential for FAIGC to have significant impacts on society, including the spread of misinformation and the erosion of trust in media and institutions.
While the paper explores several promising approaches, such as retrieval-augmented generation and the focus on visual harmony in AI-generated video content, it also highlights the need for further research and collaboration to develop more robust and effective solutions. [The paper on combating rumors and retrieval discrimination may provide additional insights in this area.
Overall, the paper is a valuable contribution to the field of FAIGC research, and it raises important questions about the ethical and societal implications of this technology. By encouraging critical thinking and further exploration, the paper can help inform the ongoing efforts to address this complex and multifaceted challenge.
Conclusion
The paper provides a comprehensive survey of the theories, detection methods, and opportunities related to Fake Artificial Intelligence Generated Contents (FAIGC). It explores the various types of FAIGC, the techniques used to create them, and the challenges in detecting these AI-generated contents.
The paper highlights the potential impacts of FAIGC, including the spread of misinformation, biases in AI-generated news content, and the broader societal implications of generative AI. It also examines the role of retrieval-augmented generation and the focus on visual harmony in AI-generated video content as potential solutions to address these challenges.
The paper's critical analysis encourages readers to think critically about the research and to consider the limitations and areas for further exploration. By providing a comprehensive overview of the FAIGC landscape, the paper can help inform the ongoing efforts to develop effective strategies for combating the spread of AI-generated content and preserving the integrity of information in the digital age.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Bias of AI-Generated Content: An Examination of News Produced by Large Language Models
Xiao Fang, Shangkun Che, Minjia Mao, Hongzhe Zhang, Ming Zhao, Xiaohang Zhao
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to transform our lives and work through the content they generate, known as AI-Generated Content (AIGC). To harness this transformation, we need to understand the limitations of LLMs. Here, we investigate the bias of AIGC produced by seven representative LLMs, including ChatGPT and LLaMA. We collect news articles from The New York Times and Reuters, both known for their dedication to provide unbiased news. We then apply each examined LLM to generate news content with headlines of these news articles as prompts, and evaluate the gender and racial biases of the AIGC produced by the LLM by comparing the AIGC and the original news articles. We further analyze the gender bias of each LLM under biased prompts by adding gender-biased messages to prompts constructed from these news headlines. Our study reveals that the AIGC produced by each examined LLM demonstrates substantial gender and racial biases. Moreover, the AIGC generated by each LLM exhibits notable discrimination against females and individuals of the Black race. Among the LLMs, the AIGC generated by ChatGPT demonstrates the lowest level of bias, and ChatGPT is the sole model capable of declining content generation when provided with biased prompts.
4/5/2024
Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methods
Kathleen C. Fraser, Hillary Dawkins, Svetlana Kiritchenko
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have advanced to a point that even humans have difficulty discerning whether a text was generated by another human, or by a computer. However, knowing whether a text was produced by human or artificial intelligence (AI) is important to determining its trustworthiness, and has applications in many domains including detecting fraud and academic dishonesty, as well as combating the spread of misinformation and political propaganda. The task of AI-generated text (AIGT) detection is therefore both very challenging, and highly critical. In this survey, we summarize state-of-the art approaches to AIGT detection, including watermarking, statistical and stylistic analysis, and machine learning classification. We also provide information about existing datasets for this task. Synthesizing the research findings, we aim to provide insight into the salient factors that combine to determine how detectable AIGT text is under different scenarios, and to make practical recommendations for future work towards this significant technical and societal challenge.
6/26/2024
IMFL-AIGC: Incentive Mechanism Design for Federated Learning Empowered by Artificial Intelligence Generated Content
Guangjing Huang, Qiong Wu, Jingyi Li, Xu Chen
0
0
Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm that enables clients to collaboratively train a shared global model without uploading their local data. To alleviate the heterogeneous data quality among clients, artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) can be leveraged as a novel data synthesis technique for FL model performance enhancement. Due to various costs incurred by AIGC-empowered FL (e.g., costs of local model computation and data synthesis), however, clients are usually reluctant to participate in FL without adequate economic incentives, which leads to an unexplored critical issue for enabling AIGC-empowered FL. To fill this gap, we first devise a data quality assessment method for data samples generated by AIGC and rigorously analyze the convergence performance of FL model trained using a blend of authentic and AI-generated data samples. We then propose a data quality-aware incentive mechanism to encourage clients' participation. In light of information asymmetry incurred by clients' private multi-dimensional attributes, we investigate clients' behavior patterns and derive the server's optimal incentive strategies to minimize server's cost in terms of both model accuracy loss and incentive payments for both complete and incomplete information scenarios. Numerical results demonstrate that our proposed mechanism exhibits highest training accuracy and reduces up to 53.34% of the server's cost with real-world datasets, compared with existing benchmark mechanisms.
6/14/2024
🤖
Blessing or curse? A survey on the Impact of Generative AI on Fake News
Alexander Loth, Martin Kappes, Marc-Oliver Pahl
0
0
Fake news significantly influence our society. They impact consumers, voters, and many other societal groups. While Fake News exist for a centuries, Generative AI brings fake news on a new level. It is now possible to automate the creation of masses of high-quality individually targeted Fake News. On the other end, Generative AI can also help detecting Fake News. Both fields are young but developing fast. This survey provides a comprehensive examination of the research and practical use of Generative AI for Fake News detection and creation in 2024. Following the Structured Literature Survey approach, the paper synthesizes current results in the following topic clusters 1) enabling technologies, 2) creation of Fake News, 3) case study social media as most relevant distribution channel, 4) detection of Fake News, and 5) deepfakes as upcoming technology. The article also identifies current challenges and open issues.
4/5/2024