Blockwise Self-Supervised Learning at Scale
12
🖼️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Current deep learning models rely heavily on backpropagation, a powerful but computationally intensive training technique.
- This paper explores alternative "blockwise" learning rules that can train different sections of a deep neural network independently.
- The researchers show that a blockwise pretraining approach using self-supervised learning can achieve performance close to end-to-end backpropagation on the ImageNet dataset.
Plain English Explanation
Deep learning models, which power many of today's most advanced AI systems, are typically trained using a technique called backpropagation. Backpropagation is very effective, but it can also be computationally expensive and time-consuming, especially for large, complex models.
In this paper, the researchers investigate an alternative approach called "blockwise learning." Instead of training the entire neural network at once using backpropagation, they train each major "block" or section of the network independently. To do this, they use a technique called self-supervised learning, which allows the network to learn useful features from the training data without needing manually labeled examples.
The researchers found that this blockwise pretraining approach, using self-supervised learning for each block, achieved performance very close to that of a network trained end-to-end with backpropagation. Specifically, a linear classifier trained on top of their blockwise pretrained model achieved 70.48% top-1 accuracy on the ImageNet dataset, only 1.1% lower than the 71.57% accuracy of the end-to-end backpropagation model.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores alternatives to full backpropagation, focusing on a "blockwise learning" approach that trains different sections of a deep neural network independently. The researchers used a ResNet-50 architecture and trained the 4 main blocks of the network separately using the Barlow Twins self-supervised learning objective.
Through extensive experimentation, the authors investigated the impact of various components within their blockwise pretraining method. They explored adaptations of self-supervised learning techniques to the blockwise paradigm, building a comprehensive understanding of the critical factors for scaling local learning rules to large networks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough exploration of blockwise pretraining as an alternative to full backpropagation, with promising results on the ImageNet dataset. However, the authors acknowledge that their approach may have limitations when scaling to even larger or more complex models. Additionally, the performance gap, though small, suggests there are still important aspects of end-to-end training that are not fully captured by the blockwise approach.
Further research would be needed to understand the broader applicability of this technique, its performance on other datasets and tasks, and any potential trade-offs or drawbacks compared to traditional backpropagation. Exploring ways to further bridge the performance gap or develop hybrid approaches that combine the strengths of both methods could also be fruitful avenues for future work.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative approach to training deep neural networks that challenges the dominance of backpropagation. By demonstrating the viability of blockwise pretraining using self-supervised learning, the researchers have opened up new possibilities for more efficient and scalable deep learning architectures.
The insights gained from this work have implications ranging from hardware design to neuroscience, as the underlying principles behind local learning rules could inspire new directions in both artificial and biological intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🖼️
12
Blockwise Self-Supervised Learning at Scale
Shoaib Ahmed Siddiqui, David Krueger, Yann LeCun, St'ephane Deny
Current state-of-the-art deep networks are all powered by backpropagation. In this paper, we explore alternatives to full backpropagation in the form of blockwise learning rules, leveraging the latest developments in self-supervised learning. We show that a blockwise pretraining procedure consisting of training independently the 4 main blocks of layers of a ResNet-50 with Barlow Twins' loss function at each block performs almost as well as end-to-end backpropagation on ImageNet: a linear probe trained on top of our blockwise pretrained model obtains a top-1 classification accuracy of 70.48%, only 1.1% below the accuracy of an end-to-end pretrained network (71.57% accuracy). We perform extensive experiments to understand the impact of different components within our method and explore a variety of adaptations of self-supervised learning to the blockwise paradigm, building an exhaustive understanding of the critical avenues for scaling local learning rules to large networks, with implications ranging from hardware design to neuroscience.
Read more8/13/2024
0
Unsupervised End-to-End Training with a Self-Defined Target
Dongshu Liu, J'er'emie Laydevant, Adrien Pontlevy, Damien Querlioz, Julie Grollier
Designing algorithms for versatile AI hardware that can learn on the edge using both labeled and unlabeled data is challenging. Deep end-to-end training methods incorporating phases of self-supervised and supervised learning are accurate and adaptable to input data but self-supervised learning requires even more computational and memory resources than supervised learning, too high for current embedded hardware. Conversely, unsupervised layer-by-layer training, such as Hebbian learning, is more compatible with existing hardware but does not integrate well with supervised learning. To address this, we propose a method enabling networks or hardware designed for end-to-end supervised learning to also perform high-performance unsupervised learning by adding two simple elements to the output layer: Winner-Take-All (WTA) selectivity and homeostasis regularization. These mechanisms introduce a self-defined target for unlabeled data, allowing purely unsupervised training for both fully-connected and convolutional layers using backpropagation or equilibrium propagation on datasets like MNIST (up to 99.2%), Fashion-MNIST (up to 90.3%), and SVHN (up to 81.5%). We extend this method to semi-supervised learning, adjusting targets based on data type, achieving 96.6% accuracy with only 600 labeled MNIST samples in a multi-layer perceptron. Our results show that this approach can effectively enable networks and hardware initially dedicated to supervised learning to also perform unsupervised learning, adapting to varying availability of labeled data.
Read more7/24/2024
❗
0
Slimmable Networks for Contrastive Self-supervised Learning
Shuai Zhao, Linchao Zhu, Xiaohan Wang, Yi Yang
Self-supervised learning makes significant progress in pre-training large models, but struggles with small models. Mainstream solutions to this problem rely mainly on knowledge distillation, which involves a two-stage procedure: first training a large teacher model and then distilling it to improve the generalization ability of smaller ones. In this work, we introduce another one-stage solution to obtain pre-trained small models without the need for extra teachers, namely, slimmable networks for contrastive self-supervised learning (SlimCLR). A slimmable network consists of a full network and several weight-sharing sub-networks, which can be pre-trained once to obtain various networks, including small ones with low computation costs. However, interference between weight-sharing networks leads to severe performance degradation in self-supervised cases, as evidenced by gradient magnitude imbalance and gradient direction divergence. The former indicates that a small proportion of parameters produce dominant gradients during backpropagation, while the main parameters may not be fully optimized. The latter shows that the gradient direction is disordered, and the optimization process is unstable. To address these issues, we introduce three techniques to make the main parameters produce dominant gradients and sub-networks have consistent outputs. These techniques include slow start training of sub-networks, online distillation, and loss re-weighting according to model sizes. Furthermore, theoretical results are presented to demonstrate that a single slimmable linear layer is sub-optimal during linear evaluation. Thus a switchable linear probe layer is applied during linear evaluation. We instantiate SlimCLR with typical contrastive learning frameworks and achieve better performance than previous arts with fewer parameters and FLOPs. The code is at https://github.com/mzhaoshuai/SlimCLR.
Read more7/30/2024
🤷
0
Employing Layerwised Unsupervised Learning to Lessen Data and Loss Requirements in Forward-Forward Algorithms
Taewook Hwang, Hyein Seo, Sangkeun Jung
Recent deep learning models such as ChatGPT utilizing the back-propagation algorithm have exhibited remarkable performance. However, the disparity between the biological brain processes and the back-propagation algorithm has been noted. The Forward-Forward algorithm, which trains deep learning models solely through the forward pass, has emerged to address this. Although the Forward-Forward algorithm cannot replace back-propagation due to limitations such as having to use special input and loss functions, it has the potential to be useful in special situations where back-propagation is difficult to use. To work around this limitation and verify usability, we propose an Unsupervised Forward-Forward algorithm. Using an unsupervised learning model enables training with usual loss functions and inputs without restriction. Through this approach, we lead to stable learning and enable versatile utilization across various datasets and tasks. From a usability perspective, given the characteristics of the Forward-Forward algorithm and the advantages of the proposed method, we anticipate its practical application even in scenarios such as federated learning, where deep learning layers need to be trained separately in physically distributed environments.
Read more4/24/2024