Blurring Diffusion Models
2209.05557
0
0
π
Abstract
Recently, Rissanen et al., (2022) have presented a new type of diffusion process for generative modeling based on heat dissipation, or blurring, as an alternative to isotropic Gaussian diffusion. Here, we show that blurring can equivalently be defined through a Gaussian diffusion process with non-isotropic noise. In making this connection, we bridge the gap between inverse heat dissipation and denoising diffusion, and we shed light on the inductive bias that results from this modeling choice. Finally, we propose a generalized class of diffusion models that offers the best of both standard Gaussian denoising diffusion and inverse heat dissipation, which we call Blurring Diffusion Models.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Rissanen et al. (2022) have presented a new type of diffusion process for generative modeling based on heat dissipation or blurring.
- This process can be equivalently defined through a Gaussian diffusion process with non-isotropic noise.
- This connection bridges the gap between inverse heat dissipation and denoising diffusion, and sheds light on the inductive bias resulting from this modeling choice.
- The paper proposes a generalized class of diffusion models called Blurring Diffusion Models, which combines the benefits of standard Gaussian denoising diffusion and inverse heat dissipation.
Plain English Explanation
Diffusion models are a type of generative model that can create new, realistic-looking data like images or text. These models work by gradually adding noise to the data, then learning to reverse the process to generate new samples.
The paper introduces a new way of adding noise to the data, based on the concept of "heat dissipation" or "blurring." This is an alternative to the standard approach of using isotropic Gaussian noise, which adds the same amount of noise in all directions.
The key insight is that this blurring process can be equivalently defined using a Gaussian diffusion process with non-isotropic noise. This helps bridge the gap between two different perspectives on diffusion models: inverse heat dissipation and denoising diffusion.
By unifying these perspectives, the paper sheds light on the underlying inductive bias of the modeling choices. It then proposes a new class of diffusion models, called Blurring Diffusion Models, that combines the benefits of both standard Gaussian denoising diffusion and inverse heat dissipation.
Technical Explanation
The paper shows that the blurring process introduced by Rissanen et al. (2022) can be equivalently defined through a Gaussian diffusion process with non-isotropic noise. This connection is made by analyzing the mathematical formulation of the blurring process and demonstrating its equivalence to a Gaussian diffusion with an appropriate covariance structure.
Specifically, the authors derive the connection between the inverse heat dissipation perspective and the denoising diffusion formulation. This allows them to better understand the inductive bias introduced by the blurring process, which can be seen as favoring certain types of structures or patterns in the generated data.
Building on this insight, the paper proposes a generalized class of diffusion models called Blurring Diffusion Models. These models combine the flexibility of standard Gaussian denoising diffusion, as explored in prior work, with the inductive biases introduced by the blurring process.
The authors suggest that this generalized class of models can offer the best of both approaches, potentially leading to improved performance on a range of generative tasks while providing a more interpretable and controllable modeling framework.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable theoretical contribution by bridging the gap between two different perspectives on diffusion models, inverse heat dissipation, and denoising diffusion. This unification sheds light on the inductive biases underlying the modeling choices, which is an important consideration when applying diffusion models to real-world problems.
However, the paper does not provide extensive empirical evaluations of the proposed Blurring Diffusion Models. While the authors suggest that this generalized class of models can offer benefits, more research is needed to fully assess their performance and practical advantages compared to other diffusion modeling approaches.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential limitations or challenges that may arise when implementing Blurring Diffusion Models. For example, the non-isotropic noise formulation may introduce computational or numerical stability issues that require careful consideration.
Overall, the paper presents an interesting theoretical advancement in the understanding of diffusion models, but further empirical validation and exploration of the practical implications of Blurring Diffusion Models would be valuable for the research community.
Conclusion
This paper by Rissanen et al. (2022) introduces a new perspective on diffusion models for generative modeling, bridging the gap between inverse heat dissipation and denoising diffusion. By showing the equivalence between blurring and Gaussian diffusion with non-isotropic noise, the authors provide a unifying framework that sheds light on the inductive biases of these modeling choices.
The proposed Blurring Diffusion Models combine the flexibility of standard Gaussian denoising diffusion with the inductive biases introduced by the blurring process, potentially offering improved performance and interpretability for a range of generative tasks. While further empirical validation is needed, this work represents a valuable theoretical contribution to the understanding and development of diffusion models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
βοΈ
To smooth a cloud or to pin it down: Guarantees and Insights on Score Matching in Denoising Diffusion Models
Francisco Vargas, Teodora Reu, Anna Kerekes, Michael M Bronstein
0
0
Denoising diffusion models are a class of generative models which have recently achieved state-of-the-art results across many domains. Gradual noise is added to the data using a diffusion process, which transforms the data distribution into a Gaussian. Samples from the generative model are then obtained by simulating an approximation of the time reversal of this diffusion initialized by Gaussian samples. Recent research has explored adapting diffusion models for sampling and inference tasks. In this paper, we leverage known connections to stochastic control akin to the Follmer drift to extend established neural network approximation results for the Follmer drift to denoising diffusion models and samplers.
6/28/2024
β
Physics-Informed Diffusion Models
Jan-Hendrik Bastek, WaiChing Sun, Dennis M. Kochmann
0
0
Generative models such as denoising diffusion models are quickly advancing their ability to approximate highly complex data distributions. They are also increasingly leveraged in scientific machine learning, where samples from the implied data distribution are expected to adhere to specific governing equations. We present a framework to inform denoising diffusion models of underlying constraints on such generated samples during model training. Our approach improves the alignment of the generated samples with the imposed constraints and significantly outperforms existing methods without affecting inference speed. Additionally, our findings suggest that incorporating such constraints during training provides a natural regularization against overfitting. Our framework is easy to implement and versatile in its applicability for imposing equality and inequality constraints as well as auxiliary optimization objectives.
5/24/2024
Diffusion Models in Low-Level Vision: A Survey
Chunming He, Yuqi Shen, Chengyu Fang, Fengyang Xiao, Longxiang Tang, Yulun Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, Zhenhua Guo, Xiu Li
0
0
Deep generative models have garnered significant attention in low-level vision tasks due to their generative capabilities. Among them, diffusion model-based solutions, characterized by a forward diffusion process and a reverse denoising process, have emerged as widely acclaimed for their ability to produce samples of superior quality and diversity. This ensures the generation of visually compelling results with intricate texture information. Despite their remarkable success, a noticeable gap exists in a comprehensive survey that amalgamates these pioneering diffusion model-based works and organizes the corresponding threads. This paper proposes the comprehensive review of diffusion model-based techniques. We present three generic diffusion modeling frameworks and explore their correlations with other deep generative models, establishing the theoretical foundation. Following this, we introduce a multi-perspective categorization of diffusion models, considering both the underlying framework and the target task. Additionally, we summarize extended diffusion models applied in other tasks, including medical, remote sensing, and video scenarios. Moreover, we provide an overview of commonly used benchmarks and evaluation metrics. We conduct a thorough evaluation, encompassing both performance and efficiency, of diffusion model-based techniques in three prominent tasks. Finally, we elucidate the limitations of current diffusion models and propose seven intriguing directions for future research. This comprehensive examination aims to facilitate a profound understanding of the landscape surrounding denoising diffusion models in the context of low-level vision tasks. A curated list of diffusion model-based techniques in over 20 low-level vision tasks can be found at https://github.com/ChunmingHe/awesome-diffusion-models-in-low-level-vision.
6/18/2024
Listening to the Noise: Blind Denoising with Gibbs Diffusion
David Heurtel-Depeiges, Charles C. Margossian, Ruben Ohana, Bruno R'egaldo-Saint Blancard
0
0
In recent years, denoising problems have become intertwined with the development of deep generative models. In particular, diffusion models are trained like denoisers, and the distribution they model coincide with denoising priors in the Bayesian picture. However, denoising through diffusion-based posterior sampling requires the noise level and covariance to be known, preventing blind denoising. We overcome this limitation by introducing Gibbs Diffusion (GDiff), a general methodology addressing posterior sampling of both the signal and the noise parameters. Assuming arbitrary parametric Gaussian noise, we develop a Gibbs algorithm that alternates sampling steps from a conditional diffusion model trained to map the signal prior to the family of noise distributions, and a Monte Carlo sampler to infer the noise parameters. Our theoretical analysis highlights potential pitfalls, guides diagnostic usage, and quantifies errors in the Gibbs stationary distribution caused by the diffusion model. We showcase our method for 1) blind denoising of natural images involving colored noises with unknown amplitude and spectral index, and 2) a cosmology problem, namely the analysis of cosmic microwave background data, where Bayesian inference of noise parameters means constraining models of the evolution of the Universe.
6/27/2024