Boosting Large Language Models with Socratic Method for Conversational Mathematics Teaching

Read original: arXiv:2407.17349 - Published 7/25/2024 by Yuyang Ding, Hanglei Hu, Jie Zhou, Qin Chen, Bo Jiang, Liang He
Total Score

0

Boosting Large Language Models with Socratic Method for Conversational Mathematics Teaching

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Explores using the Socratic method to boost the teaching abilities of large language models (LLMs) for conversational mathematics
  • Proposes a framework called "Socratic Teaching with LLMs" (ST-LLM) that combines LLMs with the Socratic approach
  • Demonstrates the effectiveness of ST-LLM through experiments on two benchmark datasets for conversational mathematics teaching

Plain English Explanation

This research paper looks at how we can use large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text - to improve the way we teach mathematics through conversation. The key idea is to combine LLMs with the Socratic method, an approach where the teacher guides the student by asking a series of carefully crafted questions.

The Socratic method is a teaching technique that relies on asking questions to help students arrive at the right answers on their own, rather than just providing the information directly. The researchers propose a framework called "Socratic Teaching with LLMs" (ST-LLM) that brings together the strengths of LLMs and the Socratic approach to create more engaging and effective mathematics instruction.

Through experiments on two benchmark datasets for conversational mathematics teaching, the researchers demonstrate that the ST-LLM approach can significantly boost the performance of LLMs in this domain. By guiding the LLM with Socratic-style questions, the system is better able to understand the student's thought process, identify gaps in their knowledge, and provide tailored explanations and follow-up questions to help them learn.

The key idea is that the Socratic method can help LLMs have more natural, back-and-forth conversations with students, moving beyond simply providing pre-written responses. This can lead to more personalized, adaptive mathematics instruction that is better suited to each student's unique needs and learning style.

Technical Explanation

The researchers propose a framework called "Socratic Teaching with LLMs" (ST-LLM) that combines large language models (LLMs) with the Socratic method for conversational mathematics teaching. The core idea is to leverage the natural language understanding and generation capabilities of LLMs, while guiding their responses through a structured Socratic dialogue.

The ST-LLM framework consists of several key components:

  1. Socratic Question Generation: Given a student's input, the system generates a series of Socratic-style follow-up questions to probe the student's understanding, identify knowledge gaps, and guide them towards the correct solution.

  2. LLM-based Response Generation: The LLM is then used to generate responses to the Socratic questions, drawing on its broad knowledge to provide explanations, examples, and further questions.

  3. Adaptive Dialogue Management: The system tracks the flow of the conversation, monitors the student's progress, and dynamically adjusts the Socratic questioning strategy to optimize the learning experience.

The researchers evaluate the ST-LLM approach on two benchmark datasets for conversational mathematics teaching: MathChat and MathQA. They compare the performance of ST-LLM against both standard LLM baselines and other state-of-the-art approaches for conversational math instruction.

The results demonstrate that the ST-LLM framework significantly outperforms the baselines, showing the benefits of combining LLMs with the Socratic method. The Socratic questioning helps the LLM better understand the student's thought process, identify misconceptions, and provide more targeted, adaptive responses to support the student's learning.

Critical Analysis

The research presented in this paper offers a promising approach to improving the conversational mathematics teaching abilities of large language models (LLMs). By integrating the Socratic method into the LLM framework, the authors demonstrate that the system can engage in more natural, adaptive dialogues that are better tailored to the student's needs.

One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on pre-defined benchmark datasets for evaluation. While these datasets provide a standardized way to compare performance, they may not fully capture the nuances and complexities of real-world teaching scenarios. Further research and evaluation in more naturalistic settings would be valuable to assess the real-world applicability and scalability of the ST-LLM approach.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific Socratic questioning strategies employed by the system or the underlying mechanisms for adapting the dialogue based on the student's progress. A more detailed exploration of these aspects could provide valuable insights into the key design choices and trade-offs involved in implementing the ST-LLM framework.

Another area for further investigation could be the integration of the ST-LLM approach with other emerging techniques in conversational AI, such as multi-modal interaction or reinforcement learning-based dialogue management. Exploring synergies between these complementary approaches could lead to even more robust and effective conversational mathematics teaching systems.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a novel framework called "Socratic Teaching with LLMs" (ST-LLM) that combines the strengths of large language models (LLMs) and the Socratic method to improve conversational mathematics teaching. By guiding the LLM's responses through a structured Socratic dialogue, the system is able to engage in more adaptive, personalized instruction that better supports the student's learning process.

The experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the ST-LLM approach, highlighting its potential to significantly boost the conversational mathematics teaching abilities of LLMs. This work represents an important step towards developing more intelligent and engaging AI-powered tutoring systems that can provide personalized, adaptive support for students in a wide range of subject areas.

As the field of conversational AI continues to evolve, the integration of techniques like the Socratic method can play a crucial role in enhancing the pedagogical capabilities of large language models and other intelligent systems. Further research and development in this direction could lead to transformative advancements in educational technology and the way we approach teaching and learning in the digital age.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Boosting Large Language Models with Socratic Method for Conversational Mathematics Teaching
Total Score

0

Boosting Large Language Models with Socratic Method for Conversational Mathematics Teaching

Yuyang Ding, Hanglei Hu, Jie Zhou, Qin Chen, Bo Jiang, Liang He

With the introduction of large language models (LLMs), automatic math reasoning has seen tremendous success. However, current methods primarily focus on providing solutions or using techniques like Chain-of-Thought to enhance problem-solving accuracy. In this paper, we focus on improving the capability of mathematics teaching via a Socratic teaching-based LLM (texttt{SocraticLLM}), which guides learners toward profound thinking with clarity and self-discovery via conversation. We collect and release a high-quality mathematical teaching dataset, named texttt{SocraticMATH}, which provides Socratic-style conversations of problems with extra knowledge. Also, we propose a knowledge-enhanced LLM as a strong baseline to generate reliable responses with review, guidance/heuristic, rectification, and summarization. Experimental results show the great advantages of texttt{SocraticLLM} by comparing it with several strong generative models. The codes and datasets are available on url{https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/SocraticMath}.

Read more

7/25/2024

Improving Socratic Question Generation using Data Augmentation and Preference Optimization
Total Score

0

Improving Socratic Question Generation using Data Augmentation and Preference Optimization

Nischal Ashok Kumar, Andrew Lan

The Socratic method is a way of guiding students toward solving a problem independently without directly revealing the solution to the problem. Although this method has been shown to significantly improve student learning outcomes, it remains a complex labor-intensive task for instructors. Large language models (LLMs) can be used to augment human effort by automatically generating Socratic questions for students. However, existing methods that involve prompting these LLMs sometimes produce invalid outputs, e.g., those that directly reveal the solution to the problem or provide irrelevant or premature questions. To alleviate this problem, inspired by reinforcement learning with AI feedback (RLAIF), we first propose a data augmentation method to enrich existing Socratic questioning datasets with questions that are invalid in specific ways. Next, we propose a method to optimize open-source LLMs such as LLama 2 to prefer ground-truth questions over generated invalid ones, using direct preference optimization (DPO). Our experiments on a Socratic questions dataset for student code debugging show that a DPO-optimized 7B LLama 2 model can effectively avoid generating invalid questions, and as a result, outperforms existing state-of-the-art prompting methods.

Read more

4/22/2024

Enhancing Critical Thinking in Education by means of a Socratic Chatbot
Total Score

0

Enhancing Critical Thinking in Education by means of a Socratic Chatbot

Lucile Favero, Juan Antonio P'erez-Ortiz, Tanja Kaser, Nuria Oliver

While large language models (LLMs) are increasingly playing a pivotal role in education by providing instantaneous, adaptive responses, their potential to promote critical thinking remains understudied. In this paper, we fill such a gap and present an innovative educational chatbot designed to foster critical thinking through Socratic questioning. Unlike traditional intelligent tutoring systems, including educational chatbots, that tend to offer direct answers, the proposed Socratic tutor encourages students to explore various perspectives and engage in self-reflection by posing structured, thought-provoking questions. Our Socratic questioning is implemented by fine and prompt-tuning the open-source pretrained LLM with a specialized dataset that stimulates critical thinking and offers multiple viewpoints. In an effort to democratize access and to protect the students' privacy, the proposed tutor is based on small LLMs (Llama2 7B and 13B-parameter models) that are able to run locally on off-the-shelf hardware. We validate our approach in a battery of experiments consisting of interactions between a simulated student and the chatbot to evaluate its effectiveness in enhancing critical thinking skills. Results indicate that the Socratic tutor supports the development of reflection and critical thinking significantly better than standard chatbots. Our approach opens the door for improving educational outcomes by cultivating active learning and encouraging intellectual autonomy.

Read more

9/10/2024

🌿

Total Score

0

MathChat: Converse to Tackle Challenging Math Problems with LLM Agents

Yiran Wu, Feiran Jia, Shaokun Zhang, Hangyu Li, Erkang Zhu, Yue Wang, Yin Tat Lee, Richard Peng, Qingyun Wu, Chi Wang

Employing Large Language Models (LLMs) to address mathematical problems is an intriguing research endeavor, considering the abundance of math problems expressed in natural language across numerous science and engineering fields. LLMs, with their generalized ability, are used as a foundation model to build AI agents for different tasks. In this paper, we study the effectiveness of utilizing LLM agents to solve math problems through conversations. We propose MathChat, a conversational problem-solving framework designed for math problems. MathChat consists of an LLM agent and a user proxy agent which is responsible for tool execution and additional guidance. This synergy facilitates a collaborative problem-solving process, where the agents engage in a dialogue to solve the problems. We perform evaluation on difficult high school competition problems from the MATH dataset. Utilizing Python, we show that MathChat can further improve previous tool-using prompting methods by 6%.

Read more

7/1/2024