Improving Socratic Question Generation using Data Augmentation and Preference Optimization
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores ways to improve the generation of Socratic questions using data augmentation and preference optimization techniques.
- Socratic questioning is a pedagogical method where instructors ask probing questions to guide students towards deeper understanding.
- The authors aim to develop an AI system that can automatically generate high-quality Socratic questions to support teaching and learning.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on improving the ability of AI systems to generate Socratic questions. Socratic questioning is a teaching method where the instructor asks a series of thoughtful questions to help students explore a topic more deeply and arrive at new insights on their own.
The researchers want to develop an AI assistant that can automatically generate helpful Socratic questions, which could be a useful tool for teachers and students. To do this, they explore techniques like data augmentation to expand the available training data, and preference optimization to ensure the generated questions align with desired qualities.
The goal is to create an AI system that can engage students in productive, thoughtful dialogues, just like a skilled human teacher using the Socratic method. This could make teaching and learning more interactive and effective, especially in areas where personalized feedback is valuable.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes several technical approaches to improve Socratic question generation:
-
Data Augmentation: The researchers leverage techniques like paraphrasing and back-translation to expand the limited dataset of existing Socratic questions. This helps the AI model learn more robust patterns for generating high-quality questions.
-
Preference Optimization: The authors develop a framework to optimize the generated questions based on specific desirable qualities, such as probing depth, clarity, and relevance. This allows the model to learn to generate questions that are more aligned with effective Socratic questioning.
-
Iterative Refinement: The paper explores an iterative process where the model generates questions, receives feedback, and then refines its question generation capabilities over multiple rounds. This iterative approach helps the model better understand the characteristics of effective Socratic questions.
-
Evaluation: The researchers devise novel evaluation metrics to assess the quality of the generated questions, going beyond simple measures like question-answer accuracy. This allows a more holistic evaluation of the questions' pedagogical value.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful approach to a challenging problem, but there are a few areas that could be explored further:
-
The dataset size and diversity are still relatively limited, which could constrain the model's ability to generalize. Exploring larger, more diverse datasets may help improve the system's flexibility.
-
The preference optimization framework is an interesting idea, but the specific criteria used could be further refined and validated with input from education experts. Incorporating more nuanced pedagogical principles could lead to even more effective Socratic questions.
-
While the iterative refinement process shows promise, the authors could investigate alternative training approaches, such as reinforcement learning, to see if the model can learn the desired question-generation skills more efficiently.
Overall, this paper takes an important step towards developing AI-powered Socratic questioning systems, which could have significant implications for interactive, personalized learning experiences.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to improving Socratic question generation using data augmentation and preference optimization techniques. By expanding the training data and optimizing the generated questions based on desirable qualities, the researchers aim to create an AI system that can engage students in thoughtful, Socratic-style dialogues.
The proposed methods show promising results, but there are opportunities to further refine the approach, such as exploring larger datasets, more nuanced evaluation criteria, and alternative training strategies. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step towards leveraging AI to enhance interactive, personalized learning experiences.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Improving Socratic Question Generation using Data Augmentation and Preference Optimization
Nischal Ashok Kumar, Andrew Lan
The Socratic method is a way of guiding students toward solving a problem independently without directly revealing the solution to the problem. Although this method has been shown to significantly improve student learning outcomes, it remains a complex labor-intensive task for instructors. Large language models (LLMs) can be used to augment human effort by automatically generating Socratic questions for students. However, existing methods that involve prompting these LLMs sometimes produce invalid outputs, e.g., those that directly reveal the solution to the problem or provide irrelevant or premature questions. To alleviate this problem, inspired by reinforcement learning with AI feedback (RLAIF), we first propose a data augmentation method to enrich existing Socratic questioning datasets with questions that are invalid in specific ways. Next, we propose a method to optimize open-source LLMs such as LLama 2 to prefer ground-truth questions over generated invalid ones, using direct preference optimization (DPO). Our experiments on a Socratic questions dataset for student code debugging show that a DPO-optimized 7B LLama 2 model can effectively avoid generating invalid questions, and as a result, outperforms existing state-of-the-art prompting methods.
Read more4/22/2024
0
Boosting Large Language Models with Socratic Method for Conversational Mathematics Teaching
Yuyang Ding, Hanglei Hu, Jie Zhou, Qin Chen, Bo Jiang, Liang He
With the introduction of large language models (LLMs), automatic math reasoning has seen tremendous success. However, current methods primarily focus on providing solutions or using techniques like Chain-of-Thought to enhance problem-solving accuracy. In this paper, we focus on improving the capability of mathematics teaching via a Socratic teaching-based LLM (texttt{SocraticLLM}), which guides learners toward profound thinking with clarity and self-discovery via conversation. We collect and release a high-quality mathematical teaching dataset, named texttt{SocraticMATH}, which provides Socratic-style conversations of problems with extra knowledge. Also, we propose a knowledge-enhanced LLM as a strong baseline to generate reliable responses with review, guidance/heuristic, rectification, and summarization. Experimental results show the great advantages of texttt{SocraticLLM} by comparing it with several strong generative models. The codes and datasets are available on url{https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/SocraticMath}.
Read more7/25/2024
0
Enhancing Critical Thinking in Education by means of a Socratic Chatbot
Lucile Favero, Juan Antonio P'erez-Ortiz, Tanja Kaser, Nuria Oliver
While large language models (LLMs) are increasingly playing a pivotal role in education by providing instantaneous, adaptive responses, their potential to promote critical thinking remains understudied. In this paper, we fill such a gap and present an innovative educational chatbot designed to foster critical thinking through Socratic questioning. Unlike traditional intelligent tutoring systems, including educational chatbots, that tend to offer direct answers, the proposed Socratic tutor encourages students to explore various perspectives and engage in self-reflection by posing structured, thought-provoking questions. Our Socratic questioning is implemented by fine and prompt-tuning the open-source pretrained LLM with a specialized dataset that stimulates critical thinking and offers multiple viewpoints. In an effort to democratize access and to protect the students' privacy, the proposed tutor is based on small LLMs (Llama2 7B and 13B-parameter models) that are able to run locally on off-the-shelf hardware. We validate our approach in a battery of experiments consisting of interactions between a simulated student and the chatbot to evaluate its effectiveness in enhancing critical thinking skills. Results indicate that the Socratic tutor supports the development of reflection and critical thinking significantly better than standard chatbots. Our approach opens the door for improving educational outcomes by cultivating active learning and encouraging intellectual autonomy.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Instruct, Not Assist: LLM-based Multi-Turn Planning and Hierarchical Questioning for Socratic Code Debugging
Priyanka Kargupta, Ishika Agarwal, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, Jiawei Han
Socratic questioning is an effective teaching strategy, encouraging critical thinking and problem-solving. The conversational capabilities of large language models (LLMs) show great potential for providing scalable, real-time student guidance. However, current LLMs often give away solutions directly, making them ineffective instructors. We tackle this issue in the code debugging domain with TreeInstruct, an Instructor agent guided by a novel state space-based planning algorithm. TreeInstruct asks probing questions to help students independently identify and resolve errors. It estimates a student's conceptual and syntactical knowledge to dynamically construct a question tree based on their responses and current knowledge state, effectively addressing both independent and dependent mistakes concurrently in a multi-turn interaction setting. In addition to using an existing single-bug debugging benchmark, we construct a more challenging multi-bug dataset of 150 coding problems, incorrect solutions, and bug fixes -- all carefully constructed and annotated by experts. Extensive evaluation shows TreeInstruct's state-of-the-art performance on both datasets, proving it to be a more effective instructor than baselines. Furthermore, a real-world case study with five students of varying skill levels further demonstrates TreeInstruct's ability to guide students to debug their code efficiently with minimal turns and highly Socratic questioning. We provide our code and datasets at http://github.com/agarwalishika/TreeInstruct .
Read more8/21/2024