Breaking Agents: Compromising Autonomous LLM Agents Through Malfunction Amplification
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how autonomous large language model (LLM) agents can be compromised through "malfunction amplification" attacks.
- The researchers demonstrate techniques for inserting and activating backdoor vulnerabilities in LLM agents, allowing them to be manipulated.
- The findings raise concerns about the potential risks of overreliance on autonomous AI systems and the need for robust safeguards.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines ways that advanced AI language models, known as LLMs, could be tricked or manipulated. LLMs are a type of artificial intelligence that can generate human-like text and language. They are increasingly being used in autonomous AI systems, where the LLM acts as the "brain" to power tasks like chatbots, virtual assistants, and creative writing.
The researchers show how it's possible to insert hidden vulnerabilities, or "backdoors," into these LLM-powered agents. These backdoors could then be activated to make the agent behave in unintended or malicious ways, such as providing false information, ignoring safety constraints, or even directly harming users. The researchers call this a "malfunction amplification" attack.
This is concerning because as AI systems become more autonomous and rely more on LLMs, they could become susceptible to these types of attacks. If a malicious actor were able to compromise an LLM agent, they could potentially use it to cause significant harm or disruption. The paper highlights the need for developers and users of these AI systems to be aware of these risks and to implement robust safeguards to protect against them.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on exploring vulnerabilities in autonomous LLM agents, which are AI systems that use large language models as their core decision-making component. The researchers demonstrate techniques for inserting and activating "backdoor" vulnerabilities in these LLM agents, allowing them to be manipulated and made to behave in unintended ways.
The core of the attack is a "malfunction amplification" approach, where the researchers first insert a subtle backdoor into the LLM during the training process. This backdoor is designed to be activated by a specific trigger, such as a particular input or command. When the trigger is encountered, the backdoor causes the LLM agent to malfunction in a way that amplifies the impact of the attack.
Through a series of experiments, the researchers show how these backdoor attacks can be used to make the LLM agent ignore safety constraints, provide false information, or even take harmful actions. The attacks are demonstrated across different types of LLM agents, including those used for language generation, question answering, and decision-making.
The findings highlight the need for increased security and robustness in the development of autonomous AI systems that rely on LLMs. The researchers suggest that current approaches to AI safety and security may be insufficient, and that new techniques are needed to protect against these types of vulnerabilities.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper is concerning, as it demonstrates the potential for serious security vulnerabilities in LLM-powered autonomous agents. The ability to insert and activate backdoors that can cause these systems to malfunction in harmful ways is a significant threat, especially as LLMs become more widely deployed in critical applications.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses primarily on demonstrating the feasibility of the attack, rather than providing a comprehensive analysis of the real-world risks and mitigation strategies. The paper does not delve deeply into the specific types of harm that could result from these attacks, nor does it offer detailed recommendations for how developers and users can protect against them.
Additionally, the researchers acknowledge that their techniques may not be applicable to all LLM agents, as the specific vulnerabilities they exploit could be addressed through improved training and security measures. There is a need for further research to understand the full scope of the threat and develop more robust defenses.
Despite these caveats, the findings of this paper serve as an important wake-up call for the AI community. They highlight the critical importance of prioritizing security and safety in the development of autonomous AI systems, and the need to approach the increasing reliance on LLMs with appropriate caution and safeguards.
Conclusion
The paper "Breaking Agents: Compromising Autonomous LLM Agents Through Malfunction Amplification" presents a concerning exploration of vulnerabilities in LLM-powered autonomous agents. The researchers demonstrate techniques for inserting and activating backdoor attacks that can cause these systems to malfunction in harmful ways, raising significant concerns about the security and safety of AI systems as they become more autonomous and reliant on LLMs.
The findings underscore the need for increased vigilance and the development of more robust security measures to protect against these types of attacks. As AI systems become more integral to our daily lives and critical infrastructure, it is essential that researchers, developers, and policymakers work together to address these emerging threats and ensure the responsible and secure deployment of these technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Breaking Agents: Compromising Autonomous LLM Agents Through Malfunction Amplification
Boyang Zhang, Yicong Tan, Yun Shen, Ahmed Salem, Michael Backes, Savvas Zannettou, Yang Zhang
Recently, autonomous agents built on large language models (LLMs) have experienced significant development and are being deployed in real-world applications. These agents can extend the base LLM's capabilities in multiple ways. For example, a well-built agent using GPT-3.5-Turbo as its core can outperform the more advanced GPT-4 model by leveraging external components. More importantly, the usage of tools enables these systems to perform actions in the real world, moving from merely generating text to actively interacting with their environment. Given the agents' practical applications and their ability to execute consequential actions, it is crucial to assess potential vulnerabilities. Such autonomous systems can cause more severe damage than a standalone language model if compromised. While some existing research has explored harmful actions by LLM agents, our study approaches the vulnerability from a different perspective. We introduce a new type of attack that causes malfunctions by misleading the agent into executing repetitive or irrelevant actions. We conduct comprehensive evaluations using various attack methods, surfaces, and properties to pinpoint areas of susceptibility. Our experiments reveal that these attacks can induce failure rates exceeding 80% in multiple scenarios. Through attacks on implemented and deployable agents in multi-agent scenarios, we accentuate the realistic risks associated with these vulnerabilities. To mitigate such attacks, we propose self-examination detection methods. However, our findings indicate these attacks are difficult to detect effectively using LLMs alone, highlighting the substantial risks associated with this vulnerability.
Read more7/31/2024
🔍
0
BadAgent: Inserting and Activating Backdoor Attacks in LLM Agents
Yifei Wang, Dizhan Xue, Shengjie Zhang, Shengsheng Qian
With the prosperity of large language models (LLMs), powerful LLM-based intelligent agents have been developed to provide customized services with a set of user-defined tools. State-of-the-art methods for constructing LLM agents adopt trained LLMs and further fine-tune them on data for the agent task. However, we show that such methods are vulnerable to our proposed backdoor attacks named BadAgent on various agent tasks, where a backdoor can be embedded by fine-tuning on the backdoor data. At test time, the attacker can manipulate the deployed LLM agents to execute harmful operations by showing the trigger in the agent input or environment. To our surprise, our proposed attack methods are extremely robust even after fine-tuning on trustworthy data. Though backdoor attacks have been studied extensively in natural language processing, to the best of our knowledge, we could be the first to study them on LLM agents that are more dangerous due to the permission to use external tools. Our work demonstrates the clear risk of constructing LLM agents based on untrusted LLMs or data. Our code is public at https://github.com/DPamK/BadAgent
Read more6/6/2024
1
LLM Agents can Autonomously Exploit One-day Vulnerabilities
Richard Fang, Rohan Bindu, Akul Gupta, Daniel Kang
LLMs have becoming increasingly powerful, both in their benign and malicious uses. With the increase in capabilities, researchers have been increasingly interested in their ability to exploit cybersecurity vulnerabilities. In particular, recent work has conducted preliminary studies on the ability of LLM agents to autonomously hack websites. However, these studies are limited to simple vulnerabilities. In this work, we show that LLM agents can autonomously exploit one-day vulnerabilities in real-world systems. To show this, we collected a dataset of 15 one-day vulnerabilities that include ones categorized as critical severity in the CVE description. When given the CVE description, GPT-4 is capable of exploiting 87% of these vulnerabilities compared to 0% for every other model we test (GPT-3.5, open-source LLMs) and open-source vulnerability scanners (ZAP and Metasploit). Fortunately, our GPT-4 agent requires the CVE description for high performance: without the description, GPT-4 can exploit only 7% of the vulnerabilities. Our findings raise questions around the widespread deployment of highly capable LLM agents.
Read more4/15/2024
0
Compromising Embodied Agents with Contextual Backdoor Attacks
Aishan Liu, Yuguang Zhou, Xianglong Liu, Tianyuan Zhang, Siyuan Liang, Jiakai Wang, Yanjun Pu, Tianlin Li, Junqi Zhang, Wenbo Zhou, Qing Guo, Dacheng Tao
Large language models (LLMs) have transformed the development of embodied intelligence. By providing a few contextual demonstrations, developers can utilize the extensive internal knowledge of LLMs to effortlessly translate complex tasks described in abstract language into sequences of code snippets, which will serve as the execution logic for embodied agents. However, this paper uncovers a significant backdoor security threat within this process and introduces a novel method called method{}. By poisoning just a few contextual demonstrations, attackers can covertly compromise the contextual environment of a black-box LLM, prompting it to generate programs with context-dependent defects. These programs appear logically sound but contain defects that can activate and induce unintended behaviors when the operational agent encounters specific triggers in its interactive environment. To compromise the LLM's contextual environment, we employ adversarial in-context generation to optimize poisoned demonstrations, where an LLM judge evaluates these poisoned prompts, reporting to an additional LLM that iteratively optimizes the demonstration in a two-player adversarial game using chain-of-thought reasoning. To enable context-dependent behaviors in downstream agents, we implement a dual-modality activation strategy that controls both the generation and execution of program defects through textual and visual triggers. We expand the scope of our attack by developing five program defect modes that compromise key aspects of confidentiality, integrity, and availability in embodied agents. To validate the effectiveness of our approach, we conducted extensive experiments across various tasks, including robot planning, robot manipulation, and compositional visual reasoning. Additionally, we demonstrate the potential impact of our approach by successfully attacking real-world autonomous driving systems.
Read more8/7/2024