BRIDGE: Bridging Gaps in Image Captioning Evaluation with Stronger Visual Cues
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a new evaluation metric called BRIDGE to better assess image captioning models
- Aims to address shortcomings of existing caption evaluation metrics
- Proposes using stronger visual cues to capture nuanced aspects of image-caption alignment
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new approach to evaluating image captioning models, called BRIDGE (Bridging Gaps in Image Captioning Evaluation with Stronger Visual Cues). Existing evaluation metrics often fail to fully capture the nuanced relationship between an image and its corresponding caption. [BRIDGE] aims to address this by incorporating stronger visual cues into the evaluation process.
The key idea is that current metrics may not adequately measure important aspects of the image-caption relationship, such as how well the caption describes the visual details and overall scene depicted in the image. [BRIDGE] introduces new evaluation techniques that look beyond just the textual similarity between a caption and a reference, and instead focus on how well the caption aligns with the visual information in the image.
By considering a broader set of visual cues, [BRIDGE] hopes to provide a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of image captioning models. This could help drive the development of models that generate captions that are not just textually similar to references, but truly capture the essence of the image in a meaningful way.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews existing image captioning evaluation metrics, such as [BLEU], [METEOR], and [CIDEr], and identifies their limitations in fully capturing the nuanced relationship between images and their captions.
To address these shortcomings, the authors propose [BRIDGE], a new evaluation framework that incorporates additional visual information beyond just textual similarity. [BRIDGE] leverages pre-trained computer vision models, like [CLIP], to extract visual features from both the image and the caption. It then compares these visual features to assess how well the caption aligns with the visual content.
The authors conduct extensive experiments on popular image captioning datasets, such as [COCO] and [Flickr30k], to validate the effectiveness of [BRIDGE]. They demonstrate that [BRIDGE] can better distinguish high-quality captions that capture the visual essence of an image, compared to existing metrics.
Furthermore, the paper shows that [BRIDGE] scores correlate more strongly with human judgments of caption quality, suggesting that it provides a more meaningful assessment of image captioning performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling argument for the need to go beyond textual similarity in image captioning evaluation. The authors make a strong case that existing metrics fall short in capturing the nuanced relationship between images and their captions.
One potential limitation of the [BRIDGE] approach is its reliance on pre-trained computer vision models, which may introduce biases or limitations of their own. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that further research is needed to explore more robust ways of extracting and comparing visual features.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential computational overhead or practical challenges of implementing [BRIDGE in real-world settings. Integrating this more comprehensive evaluation framework into existing image captioning workflows may require additional considerations.
Overall, the [BRIDGE] proposal represents a valuable step forward in improving the assessment of image captioning models. By focusing on the alignment between visual and textual information, it has the potential to drive the development of more visually grounded and semantically meaningful captions.
Conclusion
The [BRIDGE] paper highlights the importance of going beyond textual similarity in image captioning evaluation. By incorporating stronger visual cues, the proposed framework aims to provide a more comprehensive and meaningful assessment of how well captions align with the visual content of images.
The findings suggest that [BRIDGE] can better capture nuanced aspects of the image-caption relationship, potentially leading to the development of more visually grounded and semantically meaningful captioning models. As the field of image captioning continues to evolve, approaches like [BRIDGE] may become increasingly crucial for driving progress and ensuring the development of high-quality, visually-aware captioning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
BRIDGE: Bridging Gaps in Image Captioning Evaluation with Stronger Visual Cues
Sara Sarto, Marcella Cornia, Lorenzo Baraldi, Rita Cucchiara
Effectively aligning with human judgment when evaluating machine-generated image captions represents a complex yet intriguing challenge. Existing evaluation metrics like CIDEr or CLIP-Score fall short in this regard as they do not take into account the corresponding image or lack the capability of encoding fine-grained details and penalizing hallucinations. To overcome these issues, in this paper, we propose BRIDGE, a new learnable and reference-free image captioning metric that employs a novel module to map visual features into dense vectors and integrates them into multi-modal pseudo-captions which are built during the evaluation process. This approach results in a multimodal metric that properly incorporates information from the input image without relying on reference captions, bridging the gap between human judgment and machine-generated image captions. Experiments spanning several datasets demonstrate that our proposal achieves state-of-the-art results compared to existing reference-free evaluation scores. Our source code and trained models are publicly available at: https://github.com/aimagelab/bridge-score.
Read more7/31/2024
0
HICEScore: A Hierarchical Metric for Image Captioning Evaluation
Zequn Zeng, Jianqiao Sun, Hao Zhang, Tiansheng Wen, Yudi Su, Yan Xie, Zhengjue Wang, Bo Chen
Image captioning evaluation metrics can be divided into two categories, reference-based metrics and reference-free metrics. However, reference-based approaches may struggle to evaluate descriptive captions with abundant visual details produced by advanced multimodal large language models, due to their heavy reliance on limited human-annotated references. In contrast, previous reference-free metrics have been proven effective via CLIP cross-modality similarity. Nonetheless, CLIP-based metrics, constrained by their solution of global image-text compatibility, often have a deficiency in detecting local textual hallucinations and are insensitive to small visual objects. Besides, their single-scale designs are unable to provide an interpretable evaluation process such as pinpointing the position of caption mistakes and identifying visual regions that have not been described. To move forward, we propose a novel reference-free metric for image captioning evaluation, dubbed Hierarchical Image Captioning Evaluation Score (HICE-S). By detecting local visual regions and textual phrases, HICE-S builds an interpretable hierarchical scoring mechanism, breaking through the barriers of the single-scale structure of existing reference-free metrics. Comprehensive experiments indicate that our proposed metric achieves the SOTA performance on several benchmarks, outperforming existing reference-free metrics like CLIP-S and PAC-S, and reference-based metrics like METEOR and CIDEr. Moreover, several case studies reveal that the assessment process of HICE-S on detailed captions closely resembles interpretable human judgments.Our code is available at https://github.com/joeyz0z/HICE.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Updating CLIP to Prefer Descriptions Over Captions
Amir Zur, Elisa Kreiss, Karel D'Oosterlinck, Christopher Potts, Atticus Geiger
Although CLIPScore is a powerful generic metric that captures the similarity between a text and an image, it fails to distinguish between a caption that is meant to complement the information in an image and a description that is meant to replace an image entirely, e.g., for accessibility. We address this shortcoming by updating the CLIP model with the Concadia dataset to assign higher scores to descriptions than captions using parameter efficient fine-tuning and a loss objective derived from work on causal interpretability. This model correlates with the judgements of blind and low-vision people while preserving transfer capabilities and has interpretable structure that sheds light on the caption--description distinction.
Read more6/17/2024
0
ICC: Quantifying Image Caption Concreteness for Multimodal Dataset Curation
Moran Yanuka, Morris Alper, Hadar Averbuch-Elor, Raja Giryes
Web-scale training on paired text-image data is becoming increasingly central to multimodal learning, but is challenged by the highly noisy nature of datasets in the wild. Standard data filtering approaches succeed in removing mismatched text-image pairs, but permit semantically related but highly abstract or subjective text. These approaches lack the fine-grained ability to isolate the most concrete samples that provide the strongest signal for learning in a noisy dataset. In this work, we propose a new metric, image caption concreteness, that evaluates caption text without an image reference to measure its concreteness and relevancy for use in multimodal learning. Our approach leverages strong foundation models for measuring visual-semantic information loss in multimodal representations. We demonstrate that this strongly correlates with human evaluation of concreteness in both single-word and sentence-level texts. Moreover, we show that curation using ICC complements existing approaches: It succeeds in selecting the highest quality samples from multimodal web-scale datasets to allow for efficient training in resource-constrained settings.
Read more6/12/2024