Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach for Byzantine-robust decentralized federated learning, which aims to make federated learning more resilient to malicious participants.
- The proposed method involves a decentralized aggregation protocol that can withstand Byzantine attacks, where some participants may provide malicious updates.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through extensive experiments, showing improved performance and robustness compared to existing federated learning methods.
Plain English Explanation
In decentralized federated learning, multiple participants (e.g., devices or organizations) collaborate to train a shared machine learning model without sharing their private data. However, this process can be vulnerable to "Byzantine" attacks, where some participants intentionally provide malicious model updates to disrupt the learning process.
The researchers in this paper developed a new approach to make decentralized federated learning more robust against such attacks. Their method involves a specialized way of aggregating the model updates from participants, which can detect and filter out the malicious updates. This helps ensure the final model is not heavily influenced by the malicious participants, even if they are in the minority.
By evaluating their approach on various datasets and attack scenarios, the authors show that their method can significantly improve the performance and reliability of federated learning, compared to existing techniques. This is an important step towards making federated learning more secure and practical for real-world applications where malicious behavior may be a concern.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is a decentralized aggregation protocol that can withstand Byzantine attacks in federated learning. The protocol involves a multi-stage process where participants first submit their model updates, then engage in a voting and filtering procedure to identify and remove any malicious updates.
The authors analyze the theoretical properties of their aggregation protocol, proving that it can tolerate a large fraction of Byzantine participants and ensure the final model is close to the optimal model that would have been obtained without any attacks.
Through extensive experiments on various datasets and attack scenarios, the researchers demonstrate that their Byzantine-robust decentralized federated learning approach outperforms existing federated learning methods in terms of model performance and robustness to attacks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous analysis of the proposed Byzantine-robust decentralized federated learning approach. The authors carefully consider various attack scenarios and demonstrate the effectiveness of their method through comprehensive experiments.
However, the paper does not discuss some potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, the protocol may still be vulnerable to "sybil" attacks, where a malicious participant creates multiple fake identities to gain a larger influence in the voting process. Additionally, the communication overhead and computational complexity of the multi-stage aggregation protocol may limit its scalability to very large federated learning systems.
Further research could explore techniques to address these potential issues, such as incorporating Sybil-resistant mechanisms or optimizing the aggregation protocol for efficiency. Investigating the practical deployment challenges and real-world applicability of the proposed approach would also be valuable.
Conclusion
This paper presents a significant advancement in decentralized federated learning by introducing a novel aggregation protocol that can withstand Byzantine attacks. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through thorough theoretical analysis and extensive experiments, showing improved model performance and robustness compared to existing federated learning methods.
The proposed technique is an important step towards making federated learning more secure and reliable, which is crucial for its widespread adoption in various applications where data privacy and integrity are paramount. The research paves the way for further developments in Byzantine-robust decentralized machine learning, with the potential to enable more trustworthy and collaborative AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learning
Minghong Fang, Zifan Zhang, Hairi, Prashant Khanduri, Jia Liu, Songtao Lu, Yuchen Liu, Neil Gong
Federated learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train machine learning models without revealing their private training data. In conventional FL, the system follows the server-assisted architecture (server-assisted FL), where the training process is coordinated by a central server. However, the server-assisted FL framework suffers from poor scalability due to a communication bottleneck at the server, and trust dependency issues. To address challenges, decentralized federated learning (DFL) architecture has been proposed to allow clients to train models collaboratively in a serverless and peer-to-peer manner. However, due to its fully decentralized nature, DFL is highly vulnerable to poisoning attacks, where malicious clients could manipulate the system by sending carefully-crafted local models to their neighboring clients. To date, only a limited number of Byzantine-robust DFL methods have been proposed, most of which are either communication-inefficient or remain vulnerable to advanced poisoning attacks. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm called BALANCE (Byzantine-robust averaging through local similarity in decentralization) to defend against poisoning attacks in DFL. In BALANCE, each client leverages its own local model as a similarity reference to determine if the received model is malicious or benign. We establish the theoretical convergence guarantee for BALANCE under poisoning attacks in both strongly convex and non-convex settings. Furthermore, the convergence rate of BALANCE under poisoning attacks matches those of the state-of-the-art counterparts in Byzantine-free settings. Extensive experiments also demonstrate that BALANCE outperforms existing DFL methods and effectively defends against poisoning attacks.
Read more7/16/2024
0
Byzantine-Robust Aggregation for Securing Decentralized Federated Learning
Diego Cajaraville-Aboy, Ana Fern'andez-Vilas, Rebeca P. D'iaz-Redondo, Manuel Fern'andez-Veiga
Federated Learning (FL) emerges as a distributed machine learning approach that addresses privacy concerns by training AI models locally on devices. Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) extends the FL paradigm by eliminating the central server, thereby enhancing scalability and robustness through the avoidance of a single point of failure. However, DFL faces significant challenges in optimizing security, as most Byzantine-robust algorithms proposed in the literature are designed for centralized scenarios. In this paper, we present a novel Byzantine-robust aggregation algorithm to enhance the security of Decentralized Federated Learning environments, coined WFAgg. This proposal handles the adverse conditions and strength robustness of dynamic decentralized topologies at the same time by employing multiple filters to identify and mitigate Byzantine attacks. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in maintaining model accuracy and convergence in the presence of various Byzantine attack scenarios, outperforming state-of-the-art centralized Byzantine-robust aggregation schemes (such as Multi-Krum or Clustering). These algorithms are evaluated on an IID image classification problem in both centralized and decentralized scenarios.
Read more9/27/2024
0
Asynchronous Byzantine Federated Learning
Bart Cox, Abele Mu{a}lan, Lydia Y. Chen, J'er'emie Decouchant
Federated learning (FL) enables a set of geographically distributed clients to collectively train a model through a server. Classically, the training process is synchronous, but can be made asynchronous to maintain its speed in presence of slow clients and in heterogeneous networks. The vast majority of Byzantine fault-tolerant FL systems however rely on a synchronous training process. Our solution is one of the first Byzantine-resilient and asynchronous FL algorithms that does not require an auxiliary server dataset and is not delayed by stragglers, which are shortcomings of previous works. Intuitively, the server in our solution waits to receive a minimum number of updates from clients on its latest model to safely update it, and is later able to safely leverage the updates that late clients might send. We compare the performance of our solution with state-of-the-art algorithms on both image and text datasets under gradient inversion, perturbation, and backdoor attacks. Our results indicate that our solution trains a model faster than previous synchronous FL solution, and maintains a higher accuracy, up to 1.54x and up to 1.75x for perturbation and gradient inversion attacks respectively, in the presence of Byzantine clients than previous asynchronous FL solutions.
Read more6/21/2024
👀
0
Advancing Hybrid Defense for Byzantine Attacks in Federated Learning
Kai Yue, Richeng Jin, Chau-Wai Wong, Huaiyu Dai
Federated learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model without sharing their local data. Recent studies have highlighted the vulnerability of FL to Byzantine attacks, where malicious clients send poisoned updates to degrade model performance. Notably, many attacks have been developed targeting specific aggregation rules, whereas various defense mechanisms have been designed for dedicated threat models. This paper studies the resilience of an attack-agnostic FL scenario, where the server lacks prior knowledge of both the attackers' strategies and the number of malicious clients involved. We first introduce a hybrid defense against state-of-the-art attacks. Our goal is to identify a general-purpose aggregation rule that performs well on average while also avoiding worst-case vulnerabilities. By adaptively selecting from available defenses, we demonstrate that the server remains robust even when confronted with a substantial proportion of poisoned updates. To better understand this resilience, we then assess the attackers' capability using a proxy called client heterogeneity. We also emphasize that the existing FL defenses should not be regarded as secure, as demonstrated through the newly proposed Trapsetter attack. The proposed attack outperforms other state-of-the-art attacks by further reducing the model test accuracy by 8-10%. Our findings highlight the ongoing need for the development of Byzantine-resilient aggregation algorithms in FL.
Read more9/11/2024