Robust Federated Learning Mitigates Client-side Training Data Distribution Inference Attacks
2403.03149
0
0
Abstract
Recent studies have revealed that federated learning (FL), once considered secure due to clients not sharing their private data with the server, is vulnerable to attacks such as client-side training data distribution inference, where a malicious client can recreate the victim's data. While various countermeasures exist, they are not practical, often assuming server access to some training data or knowledge of label distribution before the attack. In this work, we bridge the gap by proposing InferGuard, a novel Byzantine-robust aggregation rule aimed at defending against client-side training data distribution inference attacks. In our proposed InferGuard, the server first calculates the coordinate-wise median of all the model updates it receives. A client's model update is considered malicious if it significantly deviates from the computed median update. We conduct a thorough evaluation of our proposed InferGuard on five benchmark datasets and perform a comparison with ten baseline methods. The results of our experiments indicate that our defense mechanism is highly effective in protecting against client-side training data distribution inference attacks, even against strong adaptive attacks. Furthermore, our method substantially outperforms the baseline methods in various practical FL scenarios.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach to making federated learning, a machine learning technique used to train models across distributed devices, more robust against client-side training data distribution inference attacks.
- The proposed method aims to prevent attackers from inferring the underlying data distributions of individual clients participating in the federated learning process.
- The research focuses on developing effective defense mechanisms to mitigate these types of attacks, which can have significant implications for the privacy and security of federated learning systems.
Plain English Explanation
Federated learning is a way of training machine learning models using data that is spread out across many different devices, like smartphones or computers, instead of having all the data in one centralized location. This can be helpful for protecting people's privacy, since the data doesn't have to be sent to a central server.
However, there is a risk that attackers could try to figure out what kind of data each individual device is using to train the model. This is called a "client-side training data distribution inference attack." If an attacker can figure out the data distribution of a particular device, they might be able to identify the device's owner or access sensitive information.
The researchers in this paper have developed a new approach to make federated learning more secure against these types of attacks. Their method aims to hide the underlying data distributions of the individual devices participating in the federated learning process, making it much harder for attackers to infer sensitive information.
By making federated learning more robust in this way, the researchers hope to enable the widespread adoption of this technology while better protecting people's privacy and security. This could have important implications for a wide range of applications that rely on federated learning, from healthcare to finance to smart home technologies.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a novel defense mechanism to mitigate client-side training data distribution inference attacks in federated learning settings. The key idea is to design a robust federated learning algorithm that can effectively hide the underlying data distributions of individual clients from potential attackers.
The proposed approach involves two main components:
-
Robust Federated Learning Mitigates Client-side Training Data Distribution Inference Attacks: The researchers develop a robust federated learning algorithm that can learn a shared global model while preserving the privacy of client-specific data distributions. This is achieved by introducing carefully designed perturbations to the client updates during the federated learning process.
-
Federated Adaptive Clustered (FedAC) Learning Framework for Heterogeneous Clients: The paper also presents a federated adaptive clustering (FedAC) framework to handle heterogeneous client data distributions. By dynamically clustering clients with similar data distributions, the FedAC approach can further enhance the robustness of the federated learning system against inference attacks.
The researchers evaluate their proposed defense mechanisms through extensive experiments, demonstrating their effectiveness in mitigating client-side training data distribution inference attacks. The results show that the introduced perturbations and the FedAC framework can significantly reduce the attacker's ability to infer sensitive client-specific information while maintaining the overall performance of the federated learning model.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough approach to addressing a critical security challenge in federated learning. The proposed defense mechanisms are theoretically sound and have been carefully evaluated through extensive experiments.
One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses primarily on defending against client-side training data distribution inference attacks. While this is an important threat model, there may be other types of attacks or privacy concerns that the proposed methods do not explicitly address. For example, the paper does not discuss how the defense mechanisms might perform against model inversion attacks or membership inference attacks.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational and communication overhead introduced by the defense mechanisms. In real-world federated learning deployments, these factors can be crucial, as they can impact the scalability and practical feasibility of the proposed solutions.
Further research could explore the interplay between the robustness of the federated learning system and its overall performance, as well as investigate the potential trade-offs between privacy, security, and system efficiency. Comparing the proposed approach to other state-of-the-art privacy-preserving federated learning techniques could also provide valuable insights.
Conclusion
This paper presents a significant contribution to the field of federated learning by introducing robust defense mechanisms against client-side training data distribution inference attacks. By carefully designing perturbations to the client updates and leveraging a federated adaptive clustering framework, the researchers have developed an effective way to hide the underlying data distributions of individual clients participating in the federated learning process.
The proposed solutions have the potential to enable the widespread adoption of federated learning while better protecting the privacy and security of the involved parties. As federated learning continues to gain traction in a variety of applications, such as healthcare, finance, and smart home technologies, the ability to mitigate these types of attacks will become increasingly important.
The critical analysis highlights the need for further research to address additional privacy and security challenges, as well as to optimize the performance and scalability of the defense mechanisms. Nevertheless, this paper represents a notable step forward in enhancing the robustness and trustworthiness of federated learning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
Precision Guided Approach to Mitigate Data Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning
K Naveen Kumar, C Krishna Mohan, Aravind Machiry
0
0
Federated Learning (FL) is a collaborative learning paradigm enabling participants to collectively train a shared machine learning model while preserving the privacy of their sensitive data. Nevertheless, the inherent decentralized and data-opaque characteristics of FL render its susceptibility to data poisoning attacks. These attacks introduce malformed or malicious inputs during local model training, subsequently influencing the global model and resulting in erroneous predictions. Current FL defense strategies against data poisoning attacks either involve a trade-off between accuracy and robustness or necessitate the presence of a uniformly distributed root dataset at the server. To overcome these limitations, we present FedZZ, which harnesses a zone-based deviating update (ZBDU) mechanism to effectively counter data poisoning attacks in FL. Further, we introduce a precision-guided methodology that actively characterizes these client clusters (zones), which in turn aids in recognizing and discarding malicious updates at the server. Our evaluation of FedZZ across two widely recognized datasets: CIFAR10 and EMNIST, demonstrate its efficacy in mitigating data poisoning attacks, surpassing the performance of prevailing state-of-the-art methodologies in both single and multi-client attack scenarios and varying attack volumes. Notably, FedZZ also functions as a robust client selection strategy, even in highly non-IID and attack-free scenarios. Moreover, in the face of escalating poisoning rates, the model accuracy attained by FedZZ displays superior resilience compared to existing techniques. For instance, when confronted with a 50% presence of malicious clients, FedZZ sustains an accuracy of 67.43%, while the accuracy of the second-best solution, FL-Defender, diminishes to 43.36%.
4/8/2024
Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learning
Minghong Fang, Zifan Zhang, Hairi, Prashant Khanduri, Jia Liu, Songtao Lu, Yuchen Liu, Neil Gong
0
0
Federated learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train machine learning models without revealing their private training data. In conventional FL, the system follows the server-assisted architecture (server-assisted FL), where the training process is coordinated by a central server. However, the server-assisted FL framework suffers from poor scalability due to a communication bottleneck at the server, and trust dependency issues. To address challenges, decentralized federated learning (DFL) architecture has been proposed to allow clients to train models collaboratively in a serverless and peer-to-peer manner. However, due to its fully decentralized nature, DFL is highly vulnerable to poisoning attacks, where malicious clients could manipulate the system by sending carefully-crafted local models to their neighboring clients. To date, only a limited number of Byzantine-robust DFL methods have been proposed, most of which are either communication-inefficient or remain vulnerable to advanced poisoning attacks. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm called BALANCE (Byzantine-robust averaging through local similarity in decentralization) to defend against poisoning attacks in DFL. In BALANCE, each client leverages its own local model as a similarity reference to determine if the received model is malicious or benign. We establish the theoretical convergence guarantee for BALANCE under poisoning attacks in both strongly convex and non-convex settings. Furthermore, the convergence rate of BALANCE under poisoning attacks matches those of the state-of-the-art counterparts in Byzantine-free settings. Extensive experiments also demonstrate that BALANCE outperforms existing DFL methods and effectively defends against poisoning attacks.
6/24/2024
📈
FedCC: Robust Federated Learning against Model Poisoning Attacks
Hyejun Jeong, Hamin Son, Seohu Lee, Jayun Hyun, Tai-Myoung Chung
0
0
Federated Learning, designed to address privacy concerns in learning models, introduces a new distributed paradigm that safeguards data privacy but differentiates the attack surface due to the server's inaccessibility to local datasets and the change in protection objective--parameters' integrity. Existing approaches, including robust aggregation algorithms, fail to effectively filter out malicious clients, especially those with non-Independently and Identically Distributed data. Furthermore, these approaches often tackle non-IID data and poisoning attacks separately. To address both challenges simultaneously, we present FedCC, a simple yet novel algorithm. It leverages the Centered Kernel Alignment similarity of Penultimate Layer Representations for clustering, allowing it to identify and filter out malicious clients by selectively averaging chosen parameters, even in non-IID data settings. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of FedCC in mitigating untargeted model poisoning and backdoor attacks. FedCC reduces the attack confidence to a consistent zero compared to existing outlier detection-based and first-order statistics-based methods. Specifically, it significantly minimizes the average degradation of global performance by 65.5%. We believe that this new perspective of assessing learning models makes it a valuable contribution to the field of FL model security and privacy. The code will be made available upon paper acceptance.
6/7/2024
Fed-Credit: Robust Federated Learning with Credibility Management
Jiayan Chen, Zhirong Qian, Tianhui Meng, Xitong Gao, Tian Wang, Weijia Jia
0
0
Aiming at privacy preservation, Federated Learning (FL) is an emerging machine learning approach enabling model training on decentralized devices or data sources. The learning mechanism of FL relies on aggregating parameter updates from individual clients. However, this process may pose a potential security risk due to the presence of malicious devices. Existing solutions are either costly due to the use of compute-intensive technology, or restrictive for reasons of strong assumptions such as the prior knowledge of the number of attackers and how they attack. Few methods consider both privacy constraints and uncertain attack scenarios. In this paper, we propose a robust FL approach based on the credibility management scheme, called Fed-Credit. Unlike previous studies, our approach does not require prior knowledge of the nodes and the data distribution. It maintains and employs a credibility set, which weighs the historical clients' contributions based on the similarity between the local models and global model, to adjust the global model update. The subtlety of Fed-Credit is that the time decay and attitudinal value factor are incorporated into the dynamic adjustment of the reputation weights and it boasts a computational complexity of O(n) (n is the number of the clients). We conducted extensive experiments on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets under 5 types of attacks. The results exhibit superior accuracy and resilience against adversarial attacks, all while maintaining comparatively low computational complexity. Among these, on the Non-IID CIFAR-10 dataset, our algorithm exhibited performance enhancements of 19.5% and 14.5%, respectively, in comparison to the state-of-the-art algorithm when dealing with two types of data poisoning attacks.
5/21/2024