Calibrated Explanations for Regression

Overview

• The paper introduces an extension of a feature importance explanation method called Calibrated Explanations, which was previously only available for classification tasks, to now support standard regression and probabilistic regression.
• Calibrated Explanations aim to provide transparency and uncertainty quantification for AI-based decision support systems, which often lack transparency.
• The method allows for both factual and counterfactual explanations, and is model-agnostic with easily understood conditional rules.

Plain English Explanation

Artificial intelligence (AI) is commonly used in decision support systems, which help people make important choices. However, the best-performing AI models used in these systems can be difficult for humans to understand. Explainable AI (XAI) aims to create AI systems that can explain their reasoning to users.

One way XAI tries to provide explanations is by looking at the importance of different features (or inputs) that the AI model used to make a particular prediction. Existing methods for explaining feature importance have a key limitation - they cannot quantify the uncertainty associated with the feature importance estimates. This means the user doesn't know how reliable or confident the explanations are.

The paper introduces an extension of a feature importance explanation method called Calibrated Explanations that addresses this limitation. Calibrated Explanations can now be used not only for classification tasks, but also for standard regression and probabilistic regression (predicting the probability that the output is above a certain threshold).

The key benefits of Calibrated Explanations are:

• It provides calibrated predictions from the underlying AI model, along with confidence intervals.
• It quantifies the uncertainty associated with the importance of each feature.
• It supports both factual explanations (why the model made a particular prediction) and counterfactual explanations (how the prediction would change if certain features were different).
• It is a model-agnostic method, meaning it can work with any type of AI model, and uses easily understood conditional rules.

The authors have made an open-source implementation of Calibrated Explanations available, making the results of the paper easy to replicate.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces an extension of the Calibrated Explanations method, which was previously only available for classification tasks, to now support standard regression and probabilistic regression.

Calibrated Explanations is a feature importance explanation method that aims to address a key limitation of existing local explanation methods - their inability to quantify the uncertainty associated with a feature's importance. This uncertainty quantification is crucial for providing reliable and trustworthy explanations to users of AI-based decision support systems.

The extended Calibrated Explanations method maintains all the benefits of the original version, such as:

• Calibration of the prediction from the underlying AI model, along with confidence intervals.
• Uncertainty quantification of feature importance, allowing the user to understand how reliable the explanations are.
• Support for both factual and counterfactual explanations.

The extension for standard regression provides fast, reliable, stable, and robust explanations. The extension for probabilistic regression introduces an entirely new way of creating probabilistic explanations from any ordinary regression model, allowing dynamic selection of thresholds.

The method is model-agnostic, meaning it can be used with any type of AI model, and it uses easily understood conditional rules to generate the explanations.

The authors have provided an open-source implementation of Calibrated Explanations in Python, which is freely available on GitHub and can be installed using both pip and conda, making the results in the paper easily replicable.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of Explainable AI by addressing a key limitation of existing local explanation methods - their inability to quantify the uncertainty associated with feature importance. This is a critical issue, as users of AI-based decision support systems need to understand not just

factors influenced a prediction, but also those explanations are.

The authors have thoughtfully designed the Calibrated Explanations method to maintain the benefits of the original version, such as calibration of the underlying model predictions and support for both factual and counterfactual explanations. The extension to support standard regression and probabilistic regression is a significant expansion of the method's capabilities.

One potential area for further research could be investigating the scalability of the Calibrated Explanations method, especially as the number of features in the AI model increases. The paper does not provide detailed performance benchmarks, which would be useful for understanding the practical limitations of the approach.

Additionally, while the authors have made the implementation freely available, it would be helpful to see more real-world case studies or user evaluations to understand how the Calibrated Explanations method performs in practice and how users perceive the value of the uncertainty quantification it provides.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the field of Explainable AI, and the Calibrated Explanations method has the potential to significantly improve the transparency and trustworthiness of AI-based decision support systems.

Conclusion

The paper introduces an extension of the Calibrated Explanations method, which provides feature importance explanations for AI models with the added benefit of quantifying the uncertainty associated with those explanations. This is a critical capability for improving the transparency and trustworthiness of AI-based decision support systems.

The extensions to support standard regression and probabilistic regression, while maintaining the key benefits of the original method, represent a significant advancement in the field of Explainable AI. The open-source implementation of Calibrated Explanations makes the results of the paper easily replicable, and the use of model-agnostic, easily understood conditional rules ensures the method can be broadly applied.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in creating AI systems that can better explain their reasoning to human users, which is essential for building trust and confidence in the use of AI technologies in high-stakes decision-making contexts.