Can language models learn analogical reasoning? Investigating training objectives and comparisons to human performance
2310.05597
0
0
Abstract
While analogies are a common way to evaluate word embeddings in NLP, it is also of interest to investigate whether or not analogical reasoning is a task in itself that can be learned. In this paper, we test several ways to learn basic analogical reasoning, specifically focusing on analogies that are more typical of what is used to evaluate analogical reasoning in humans than those in commonly used NLP benchmarks. Our experiments find that models are able to learn analogical reasoning, even with a small amount of data. We additionally compare our models to a dataset with a human baseline, and find that after training, models approach human performance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can learn analogical reasoning, a crucial cognitive ability in humans.
- The researchers explore different training objectives and compare the performance of LLMs to that of humans on various analogy tasks.
- The findings provide insights into the emergent capabilities of LLMs and the potential limitations in their reasoning abilities compared to humans.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines whether large language models (LLMs), the powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, can learn to reason using analogies. Analogical reasoning is an important cognitive skill that humans use to make connections between different concepts and draw insights.
The researchers tested LLMs on various analogy tasks, where the models had to identify relationships between words and apply that knowledge to solve new problems. For example, the analogy "king is to queen as man is to woman" requires understanding the relationship between the genders.
By comparing the performance of LLMs to that of humans on these tasks, the paper provides insights into the emergent analogical reasoning capabilities of these language models. The findings suggest that while LLMs can demonstrate some analogical reasoning abilities, they may still fall short of human-level performance in certain areas, potentially due to limitations in their training.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a series of experiments to evaluate the analogical reasoning capabilities of LLMs. They trained several LLM architectures, including GPT-3 and Megatron-LanE, using different training objectives, such as language modeling and contrastive learning.
The models were then tested on a range of analogy tasks, including word analogies, visual analogies, and analogical reasoning narratives. These tasks required the models to identify and apply relationships between concepts to solve new problems.
The results showed that LLMs can exhibit some analogical reasoning abilities, but their performance was often inferior to that of humans. The researchers found that the training objective played a significant role in the models' performance, with contrastive learning objectives generally yielding better results than standard language modeling.
The paper also discusses the potential limitations of LLMs in terms of their reasoning capabilities, noting that they may struggle with more complex or abstract analogies that require deeper understanding of the underlying concepts.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous and comprehensive investigation into the analogical reasoning capabilities of LLMs, offering valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of these powerful AI systems.
While the researchers demonstrate that LLMs can exhibit some analogical reasoning abilities, the finding that they often underperform compared to humans is an important caveat. This suggests that there are still significant gaps between the reasoning capabilities of LLMs and those of the human mind.
The paper also acknowledges that the training objectives and datasets used can have a significant impact on the models' performance, highlighting the need for further research into more effective training methods for developing robust analogical reasoning skills in LLMs.
Additionally, the researchers note that their evaluation focused on specific types of analogies, and it would be valuable to explore the models' performance on a broader range of analogical reasoning tasks to gain a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities.
Conclusion
This paper provides valuable insights into the analogical reasoning capabilities of large language models, a crucial cognitive ability for intelligent systems. The findings suggest that while LLMs can demonstrate some capacity for analogical reasoning, they still fall short of human-level performance in many instances.
The research highlights the importance of exploring different training objectives and architectures to enhance the reasoning abilities of these powerful AI systems. As the development of LLMs continues, this work underscores the need to better understand the limitations and potential of these models in order to unlock their full potential for applications that require advanced cognitive skills.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Boosting Scientific Concepts Understanding: Can Analogy from Teacher Models Empower Student Models?
Siyu Yuan, Cheng Jiayang, Lin Qiu, Deqing Yang
0
0
Analogical reasoning plays a critical role in human cognition, enabling us to understand new concepts by associating them with familiar ones. Previous research in the AI community has mainly focused on identifying and generating analogies and then examining their quality under human evaluation, which overlooks the practical application of these analogies in real-world settings. Inspired by the human education process, in this paper, we propose to investigate how analogies created by teacher language models (LMs) can assist student LMs in understanding scientific concepts, thereby aligning more closely with practical scenarios. Our results suggest that free-form analogies can indeed aid LMs in understanding concepts. Additionally, analogies generated by student LMs can improve their own performance on scientific question answering, demonstrating their capability to use analogies for self-learning new knowledge. Resources are available at https://github.com/siyuyuan/SCUA.
6/18/2024
Relevant or Random: Can LLMs Truly Perform Analogical Reasoning?
Chengwei Qin, Wenhan Xia, Tan Wang, Fangkai Jiao, Yuchen Hu, Bosheng Ding, Ruirui Chen, Shafiq Joty
0
0
Analogical reasoning is a unique ability of humans to address unfamiliar challenges by transferring strategies from relevant past experiences. One key finding in psychology is that compared with irrelevant past experiences, recalling relevant ones can help humans better handle new tasks. Coincidentally, the NLP community has also recently found that self-generating relevant examples in the context can help large language models (LLMs) better solve a given problem than hand-crafted prompts. However, it is yet not clear whether relevance is the key factor eliciting such capability, i.e., can LLMs benefit more from self-generated relevant examples than irrelevant ones? In this work, we systematically explore whether LLMs can truly perform analogical reasoning on a diverse set of reasoning tasks. With extensive experiments and analysis, we show that self-generated random examples can surprisingly achieve comparable or even better performance, e.g., 4% performance boost on GSM8K with random biological examples. We find that the accuracy of self-generated examples is the key factor and subsequently design two improved methods with significantly reduced inference costs. Overall, we aim to advance a deeper understanding of LLM analogical reasoning and hope this work stimulates further research in the design of self-generated contexts.
6/26/2024
š¬
ANALOGYKB: Unlocking Analogical Reasoning of Language Models with A Million-scale Knowledge Base
Siyu Yuan, Jiangjie Chen, Changzhi Sun, Jiaqing Liang, Yanghua Xiao, Deqing Yang
0
0
Analogical reasoning is a fundamental cognitive ability of humans. However, current language models (LMs) still struggle to achieve human-like performance in analogical reasoning tasks due to a lack of resources for model training. In this work, we address this gap by proposing ANALOGYKB, a million-scale analogy knowledge base (KB) derived from existing knowledge graphs (KGs). ANALOGYKB identifies two types of analogies from the KGs: 1) analogies of the same relations, which can be directly extracted from the KGs, and 2) analogies of analogous relations, which are identified with a selection and filtering pipeline enabled by large language models (LLMs), followed by minor human efforts for data quality control. Evaluations on a series of datasets of two analogical reasoning tasks (analogy recognition and generation) demonstrate that ANALOGYKB successfully enables both smaller LMs and LLMs to gain better analogical reasoning capabilities.
5/20/2024
š
ARN: Analogical Reasoning on Narratives
Zhivar Sourati, Filip Ilievski, Pia Sommerauer, Yifan Jiang
0
0
As a core cognitive skill that enables the transferability of information across domains, analogical reasoning has been extensively studied for both humans and computational models. However, while cognitive theories of analogy often focus on narratives and study the distinction between surface, relational, and system similarities, existing work in natural language processing has a narrower focus as far as relational analogies between word pairs. This gap brings a natural question: can state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) detect system analogies between narratives? To gain insight into this question and extend word-based relational analogies to relational system analogies, we devise a comprehensive computational framework that operationalizes dominant theories of analogy, using narrative elements to create surface and system mappings. Leveraging the interplay between these mappings, we create a binary task and benchmark for Analogical Reasoning on Narratives (ARN), covering four categories of far (cross-domain)/near (within-domain) analogies and disanalogies. We show that while all LLMs can largely recognize near analogies, even the largest ones struggle with far analogies in a zero-shot setting, with GPT4.0 scoring below random. Guiding the models through solved examples and chain-of-thought reasoning enhances their analogical reasoning ability. Yet, since even in the few-shot setting, the best model only performs halfway between random and humans, ARN opens exciting directions for computational analogical reasoners.
4/24/2024