Can Machines Resonate with Humans? Evaluating the Emotional and Empathic Comprehension of LMs
2406.11250
0
0
Abstract
Empathy plays a pivotal role in fostering prosocial behavior, often triggered by the sharing of personal experiences through narratives. However, modeling empathy using NLP approaches remains challenging due to its deep interconnection with human interaction dynamics. Previous approaches, which involve fine-tuning language models (LMs) on human-annotated empathic datasets, have had limited success. In our pursuit of improving empathy understanding in LMs, we propose several strategies, including contrastive learning with masked LMs and supervised fine-tuning with Large Language Models (LLMs). While these methods show improvements over previous methods, the overall results remain unsatisfactory. To better understand this trend, we performed an analysis which reveals a low agreement among annotators. This lack of consensus hinders training and highlights the subjective nature of the task. We also explore the cultural impact on annotations. To study this, we meticulously collected story pairs in Urdu language and find that subjectivity in interpreting empathy among annotators appears to be independent of cultural background. The insights from our systematic exploration of LMs' understanding of empathy suggest that there is considerable room for exploration in both task formulation and modeling.
Create account to get full access
Dataset and Error Analysis
Subsection: Dataset Curation and Annotation
The paper explains that the researchers curated a dataset of emotional and empathic dialogues to evaluate how well large language models can understand and respond to human emotions. They collected conversations from online forums and annotated them with emotional and empathic labels. This dataset allowed them to assess the models' ability to comprehend and generate appropriate emotional and empathic responses.
Subsection: Error Analysis
The paper then describes an error analysis conducted on the language models' performance on this dataset. They examined the types of errors the models made, such as failing to recognize emotions or provide empathic responses. This analysis helped the researchers identify areas where the models struggled and potential avenues for improvement.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers wanted to see how well large language models, which are AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text, can resonate with human emotions and empathy. To do this, they created a dataset of conversations where people expressed emotions and showed empathy towards each other. They collected these conversations from online forums and labeled them with information about the emotions and empathy involved.
They then tested several language models on this dataset to see how well the models could understand the emotions and provide appropriate empathic responses. The researchers looked closely at the mistakes the models made, such as failing to recognize emotions or give empathic replies. This error analysis helped them understand where the language models were struggling and how they could be improved to be more emotionally and empathically aware.
By evaluating language models in this way, the researchers aimed to assess the models' ability to truly understand and connect with human experiences, rather than just generate fluent text. This is an important step towards developing AI systems that can engage with people in a more meaningful and relatable way.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes the curation and annotation of a dataset of emotional and empathic dialogues, which was used to evaluate the performance of large language models in understanding and responding to human emotions and empathy. The researchers collected conversations from online forums and annotated them with labels indicating the emotional states and empathic behaviors expressed.
The researchers then conducted an error analysis to examine the types of mistakes the language models made when processing this dataset. They looked at cases where the models failed to correctly recognize the emotional content or provide appropriate empathic responses. This analysis helped identify specific areas where the models struggled and pointed to potential avenues for improvement.
By creating this specialized dataset and evaluating the language models' performance on it, the researchers aimed to gain insights into the models' emotional and empathic comprehension capabilities. This is an important step towards developing AI systems that can engage with humans in a more emotionally resonant and empathic manner, going beyond just generating fluent text.
Critical Analysis
The paper's focus on evaluating the emotional and empathic capabilities of large language models is a valuable contribution to the field. Assessing how well these models can understand and respond to human emotions is crucial as they become more ubiquitous in our lives. The use of a curated dataset of emotionally and empathically charged dialogues is a robust approach to evaluating the models' performance in this domain.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations of the study. The dataset, while carefully constructed, may not fully capture the nuances and complexities of human emotional and empathic interactions. Additionally, the error analysis provides insights into the models' weaknesses, but more research is needed to understand the underlying causes of these errors and how to effectively address them.
Further research could explore the influence of different model architectures, training data, and fine-tuning techniques on the emotional and empathic abilities of language models. Investigating how these models perform in more diverse and realistic conversational scenarios would also be valuable. Additionally, exploring the ethical implications of developing emotionally resonant AI systems and ensuring they align with human values should be a key consideration.
Conclusion
This paper presents a significant step towards understanding the emotional and empathic comprehension capabilities of large language models. By creating a specialized dataset and conducting a detailed error analysis, the researchers have provided valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of these models in this domain.
The findings of this study have important implications for the development of AI systems that can engage with humans in a more meaningful and relatable way. As language models continue to advance, ensuring their emotional and empathic awareness will be crucial for fostering more natural and beneficial interactions between humans and machines.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Are Large Language Models More Empathetic than Humans?
Anuradha Welivita, Pearl Pu
0
0
With the emergence of large language models (LLMs), investigating if they can surpass humans in areas such as emotion recognition and empathetic responding has become a focal point of research. This paper presents a comprehensive study exploring the empathetic responding capabilities of four state-of-the-art LLMs: GPT-4, LLaMA-2-70B-Chat, Gemini-1.0-Pro, and Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct in comparison to a human baseline. We engaged 1,000 participants in a between-subjects user study, assessing the empathetic quality of responses generated by humans and the four LLMs to 2,000 emotional dialogue prompts meticulously selected to cover a broad spectrum of 32 distinct positive and negative emotions. Our findings reveal a statistically significant superiority of the empathetic responding capability of LLMs over humans. GPT-4 emerged as the most empathetic, marking approximately 31% increase in responses rated as Good compared to the human benchmark. It was followed by LLaMA-2, Mixtral-8x7B, and Gemini-Pro, which showed increases of approximately 24%, 21%, and 10% in Good ratings, respectively. We further analyzed the response ratings at a finer granularity and discovered that some LLMs are significantly better at responding to specific emotions compared to others. The suggested evaluation framework offers a scalable and adaptable approach for assessing the empathy of new LLMs, avoiding the need to replicate this study's findings in future research.
6/10/2024
💬
Modeling Emotions and Ethics with Large Language Models
Edward Y. Chang
0
0
This paper explores the integration of human-like emotions and ethical considerations into Large Language Models (LLMs). We first model eight fundamental human emotions, presented as opposing pairs, and employ collaborative LLMs to reinterpret and express these emotions across a spectrum of intensity. Our focus extends to embedding a latent ethical dimension within LLMs, guided by a novel self-supervised learning algorithm with human feedback (SSHF). This approach enables LLMs to perform self-evaluations and adjustments concerning ethical guidelines, enhancing their capability to generate content that is not only emotionally resonant but also ethically aligned. The methodologies and case studies presented herein illustrate the potential of LLMs to transcend mere text and image generation, venturing into the realms of empathetic interaction and principled decision-making, thereby setting a new precedent in the development of emotionally aware and ethically conscious AI systems.
4/23/2024
Assessing Empathy in Large Language Models with Real-World Physician-Patient Interactions
Man Luo, Christopher J. Warren, Lu Cheng, Haidar M. Abdul-Muhsin, Imon Banerjee
0
0
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the healthcare domain has the potential to significantly enhance patient care and support through the development of empathetic, patient-facing chatbots. This study investigates an intriguing question Can ChatGPT respond with a greater degree of empathy than those typically offered by physicians? To answer this question, we collect a de-identified dataset of patient messages and physician responses from Mayo Clinic and generate alternative replies using ChatGPT. Our analyses incorporate novel empathy ranking evaluation (EMRank) involving both automated metrics and human assessments to gauge the empathy level of responses. Our findings indicate that LLM-powered chatbots have the potential to surpass human physicians in delivering empathetic communication, suggesting a promising avenue for enhancing patient care and reducing professional burnout. The study not only highlights the importance of empathy in patient interactions but also proposes a set of effective automatic empathy ranking metrics, paving the way for the broader adoption of LLMs in healthcare.
5/28/2024
🔎
Empathy Detection from Text, Audiovisual, Audio or Physiological Signals: Task Formulations and Machine Learning Methods
Md Rakibul Hasan, Md Zakir Hossain, Shreya Ghosh, Aneesh Krishna, Tom Gedeon
0
0
Empathy indicates an individual's ability to understand others. Over the past few years, empathy has drawn attention from various disciplines, including but not limited to Affective Computing, Cognitive Science and Psychology. Detecting empathy has potential applications in society, healthcare and education. Despite being a broad and overlapping topic, the avenue of empathy detection leveraging Machine Learning remains underexplored from a systematic literature review perspective. We collected 828 papers from 10 well-known databases, systematically screened them and analysed the final 61 papers. Our analyses reveal several prominent task formulations $-$ including empathy on localised utterances or overall expressions, unidirectional or parallel empathy, and emotional contagion $-$ in monadic, dyadic and group interactions. Empathy detection methods are summarised based on four input modalities $-$ text, audiovisual, audio and physiological signals $-$ thereby presenting modality-specific network architecture design protocols. We discuss challenges, research gaps and potential applications in the Affective Computing-based empathy domain, which can facilitate new avenues of exploration. We further enlist the public availability of datasets and codes. We believe that our work is a stepping stone to developing a robust empathy detection system that can be deployed in practice to enhance the overall well-being of human life.
6/27/2024