Assessing Empathy in Large Language Models with Real-World Physician-Patient Interactions
2405.16402
0
0
Abstract
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the healthcare domain has the potential to significantly enhance patient care and support through the development of empathetic, patient-facing chatbots. This study investigates an intriguing question Can ChatGPT respond with a greater degree of empathy than those typically offered by physicians? To answer this question, we collect a de-identified dataset of patient messages and physician responses from Mayo Clinic and generate alternative replies using ChatGPT. Our analyses incorporate novel empathy ranking evaluation (EMRank) involving both automated metrics and human assessments to gauge the empathy level of responses. Our findings indicate that LLM-powered chatbots have the potential to surpass human physicians in delivering empathetic communication, suggesting a promising avenue for enhancing patient care and reducing professional burnout. The study not only highlights the importance of empathy in patient interactions but also proposes a set of effective automatic empathy ranking metrics, paving the way for the broader adoption of LLMs in healthcare.
Create account to get full access
Overview
This paper examines the ability of large language models (LLMs) to demonstrate empathy in real-world physician-patient interactions. The researchers used a dataset of transcribed conversations between doctors and patients to assess how well LLMs could understand and respond empathetically to the emotional states and perspectives expressed by the patients. The goal was to explore the potential and limitations of using LLMs to assist in medical communication and care.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well AI language models can show empathy when communicating with patients. The researchers used actual recordings of conversations between doctors and patients to test this. They wanted to see if AI models could understand the emotions and viewpoints expressed by patients and respond in an empathetic way. This is important because AI could potentially be used to assist doctors in communicating with and caring for patients. But the researchers wanted to understand the current capabilities and limitations of these models when it comes to demonstrating human-like empathy.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes an experiment that evaluated the empathetic abilities of LLMs using a dataset of real physician-patient dialogues. The researchers developed an annotation scheme to identify instances of empathy in the conversations, and then used this to assess how well different LLMs (including GPT-3, GPT-J, Meena, and DialoGPT) could recognize and respond empathetically to the empathetic cues present in the data.
The results showed that while the LLMs were able to identify some empathetic moments, they struggled to fully capture the nuanced emotional states and perspectives expressed by the patients. The models tended to respond in a more generic, impersonal manner, lacking the contextual understanding and emotional intelligence required for truly empathetic interactions. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for the use of LLMs in medical and healthcare settings, and suggests areas for future research to improve the empathetic capabilities of these models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the current limitations of LLMs when it comes to demonstrating human-like empathy, particularly in sensitive and emotionally-charged contexts like healthcare. While the models showed some ability to recognize and respond to empathetic cues, the researchers rightly point out that this falls short of the level of emotional understanding and context-sensitivity required for truly empathetic interactions.
One area that could be explored further is the role of multimodal inputs (e.g., tone of voice, facial expressions) in enhancing the empathetic capabilities of LLMs. Research in this area suggests that incorporating nonverbal cues can improve a model's ability to understand and respond to emotional states.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential ethical implications of using LLMs in medical settings, where empathy and emotional intelligence are critical. Further research is needed to understand how these models might impact patient care and the patient-provider relationship.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the challenges of using LLMs to demonstrate the level of empathy and emotional intelligence required for effective medical communication and care. While the models showed some ability to recognize empathetic cues, they struggled to fully capture the nuanced emotional states and perspectives of patients.
Addressing these limitations will be crucial as AI becomes more integrated into healthcare settings. Ongoing research on improving the empathetic capabilities of LLMs, as well as exploring the ethical implications of their use, will be important next steps in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Are Large Language Models More Empathetic than Humans?
Anuradha Welivita, Pearl Pu
0
0
With the emergence of large language models (LLMs), investigating if they can surpass humans in areas such as emotion recognition and empathetic responding has become a focal point of research. This paper presents a comprehensive study exploring the empathetic responding capabilities of four state-of-the-art LLMs: GPT-4, LLaMA-2-70B-Chat, Gemini-1.0-Pro, and Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct in comparison to a human baseline. We engaged 1,000 participants in a between-subjects user study, assessing the empathetic quality of responses generated by humans and the four LLMs to 2,000 emotional dialogue prompts meticulously selected to cover a broad spectrum of 32 distinct positive and negative emotions. Our findings reveal a statistically significant superiority of the empathetic responding capability of LLMs over humans. GPT-4 emerged as the most empathetic, marking approximately 31% increase in responses rated as Good compared to the human benchmark. It was followed by LLaMA-2, Mixtral-8x7B, and Gemini-Pro, which showed increases of approximately 24%, 21%, and 10% in Good ratings, respectively. We further analyzed the response ratings at a finer granularity and discovered that some LLMs are significantly better at responding to specific emotions compared to others. The suggested evaluation framework offers a scalable and adaptable approach for assessing the empathy of new LLMs, avoiding the need to replicate this study's findings in future research.
6/10/2024
Can AI Relate: Testing Large Language Model Response for Mental Health Support
Saadia Gabriel, Isha Puri, Xuhai Xu, Matteo Malgaroli, Marzyeh Ghassemi
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) are already being piloted for clinical use in hospital systems like NYU Langone, Dana-Farber and the NHS. A proposed deployment use case is psychotherapy, where a LLM-powered chatbot can treat a patient undergoing a mental health crisis. Deployment of LLMs for mental health response could hypothetically broaden access to psychotherapy and provide new possibilities for personalizing care. However, recent high-profile failures, like damaging dieting advice offered by the Tessa chatbot to patients with eating disorders, have led to doubt about their reliability in high-stakes and safety-critical settings. In this work, we develop an evaluation framework for determining whether LLM response is a viable and ethical path forward for the automation of mental health treatment. Using human evaluation with trained clinicians and automatic quality-of-care metrics grounded in psychology research, we compare the responses provided by peer-to-peer responders to those provided by a state-of-the-art LLM. We show that LLMs like GPT-4 use implicit and explicit cues to infer patient demographics like race. We then show that there are statistically significant discrepancies between patient subgroups: Responses to Black posters consistently have lower empathy than for any other demographic group (2%-13% lower than the control group). Promisingly, we do find that the manner in which responses are generated significantly impacts the quality of the response. We conclude by proposing safety guidelines for the potential deployment of LLMs for mental health response.
5/21/2024
Leveraging Large Language Models for Patient Engagement: The Power of Conversational AI in Digital Health
Bo Wen, Raquel Norel, Julia Liu, Thaddeus Stappenbeck, Farhana Zulkernine, Huamin Chen
0
0
The rapid advancements in large language models (LLMs) have opened up new opportunities for transforming patient engagement in healthcare through conversational AI. This paper presents an overview of the current landscape of LLMs in healthcare, specifically focusing on their applications in analyzing and generating conversations for improved patient engagement. We showcase the power of LLMs in handling unstructured conversational data through four case studies: (1) analyzing mental health discussions on Reddit, (2) developing a personalized chatbot for cognitive engagement in seniors, (3) summarizing medical conversation datasets, and (4) designing an AI-powered patient engagement system. These case studies demonstrate how LLMs can effectively extract insights and summarizations from unstructured dialogues and engage patients in guided, goal-oriented conversations. Leveraging LLMs for conversational analysis and generation opens new doors for many patient-centered outcomes research opportunities. However, integrating LLMs into healthcare raises important ethical considerations regarding data privacy, bias, transparency, and regulatory compliance. We discuss best practices and guidelines for the responsible development and deployment of LLMs in healthcare settings. Realizing the full potential of LLMs in digital health will require close collaboration between the AI and healthcare professionals communities to address technical challenges and ensure these powerful tools' safety, efficacy, and equity.
6/21/2024
Can Machines Resonate with Humans? Evaluating the Emotional and Empathic Comprehension of LMs
Muhammad Arslan Manzoor, Yuxia Wang, Minghan Wang, Preslav Nakov
0
0
Empathy plays a pivotal role in fostering prosocial behavior, often triggered by the sharing of personal experiences through narratives. However, modeling empathy using NLP approaches remains challenging due to its deep interconnection with human interaction dynamics. Previous approaches, which involve fine-tuning language models (LMs) on human-annotated empathic datasets, have had limited success. In our pursuit of improving empathy understanding in LMs, we propose several strategies, including contrastive learning with masked LMs and supervised fine-tuning with Large Language Models (LLMs). While these methods show improvements over previous methods, the overall results remain unsatisfactory. To better understand this trend, we performed an analysis which reveals a low agreement among annotators. This lack of consensus hinders training and highlights the subjective nature of the task. We also explore the cultural impact on annotations. To study this, we meticulously collected story pairs in Urdu language and find that subjectivity in interpreting empathy among annotators appears to be independent of cultural background. The insights from our systematic exploration of LMs' understanding of empathy suggest that there is considerable room for exploration in both task formulation and modeling.
6/18/2024