Can Optimization Trajectories Explain Multi-Task Transfer?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Investigates whether optimization trajectories can explain multi-task transfer
- Focuses on how the training process on one task affects performance on other tasks
- Proposes a new framework to analyze optimization trajectories and their relationship to multi-task transfer
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores whether the way a machine learning model is trained on one task can provide insights into how well it will perform on other, related tasks. This is known as multi-task transfer - the idea that learning one task can help with learning other, similar tasks.
The researchers propose a new way to analyze the optimization trajectory, which is the path the model takes as it is trained on the first task. They hypothesize that this trajectory may contain clues about how the model's knowledge can be transferred to other tasks.
By studying the optimization trajectory, the researchers aim to better understand the mechanisms underlying multi-task transfer. This could lead to improved techniques for training models that can flexibly apply their knowledge across a variety of tasks.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new framework for analyzing optimization trajectories and their relationship to multi-task transfer performance. The key elements are:
-
Optimization Trajectory: The path the model takes as it is trained on the first task, represented as a sequence of model parameter values over training iterations.
-
Tangent Subspace: A mathematical representation of the direction in which the optimization trajectory is moving at a given point. The authors propose using this to measure the extent to which the trajectory is exploring "useful" regions of the parameter space.
-
Multi-Task Transfer: The performance of the trained model on new, related tasks, compared to models trained solely on those tasks.
The authors conduct experiments across a variety of machine learning tasks and model architectures. They find that the properties of the optimization trajectory, as captured by the tangent subspace analysis, are predictive of the model's multi-task transfer performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a novel and promising approach for analyzing the optimization process and its connection to knowledge transfer across tasks. However, some important caveats and limitations are worth noting:
-
The experiments are limited to a relatively small number of tasks and model types. More extensive evaluation is needed to assess the generality of the findings.
-
The tangent subspace analysis relies on certain mathematical assumptions that may not always hold in practice. The authors acknowledge this and suggest further research to relax these assumptions.
-
The interpretability of the optimization trajectory analysis is still limited. More work is needed to clearly explain the underlying mechanisms that link the trajectory to multi-task performance.
Nevertheless, this work represents an important step towards a deeper understanding of multi-task learning and transfer. Continued research in this direction could lead to more effective techniques for training models that can flexibly apply their knowledge across diverse problem domains.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a new framework for analyzing the optimization trajectories of machine learning models and their relationship to multi-task transfer performance. The key idea is that the properties of the optimization trajectory, as captured by the tangent subspace analysis, can provide insights into how well a model's knowledge can be transferred to new, related tasks.
The experimental results suggest that this approach has promise, but also highlight the need for further research to address limitations and expand the scope of the analysis. Ultimately, a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying multi-task transfer could lead to significant advancements in the field of artificial intelligence, enabling models that can more flexibly and efficiently apply their knowledge across a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Can Optimization Trajectories Explain Multi-Task Transfer?
David Mueller, Mark Dredze, Nicholas Andrews
Despite the widespread adoption of multi-task training in deep learning, little is understood about how multi-task learning (MTL) affects generalization. Prior work has conjectured that the negative effects of MTL are due to optimization challenges that arise during training, and many optimization methods have been proposed to improve multi-task performance. However, recent work has shown that these methods fail to consistently improve multi-task generalization. In this work, we seek to improve our understanding of these failures by empirically studying how MTL impacts the optimization of tasks, and whether this impact can explain the effects of MTL on generalization. We show that MTL results in a generalization gap-a gap in generalization at comparable training loss-between single-task and multi-task trajectories early into training. However, we find that factors of the optimization trajectory previously proposed to explain generalization gaps in single-task settings cannot explain the generalization gaps between single-task and multi-task models. Moreover, we show that the amount of gradient conflict between tasks is correlated with negative effects to task optimization, but is not predictive of generalization. Our work sheds light on the underlying causes for failures in MTL and, importantly, raises questions about the role of general purpose multi-task optimization algorithms.
Read more8/28/2024
🖼️
0
Examining Common Paradigms in Multi-Task Learning
Cathrin Elich, Lukas Kirchdorfer, Jan M. Kohler, Lukas Schott
While multi-task learning (MTL) has gained significant attention in recent years, its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Recent methods did not yield consistent performance improvements over single task learning (STL) baselines, underscoring the importance of gaining more profound insights about challenges specific to MTL. In our study, we investigate paradigms in MTL in the context of STL: First, the impact of the choice of optimizer has only been mildly investigated in MTL. We show the pivotal role of common STL tools such as the Adam optimizer in MTL empirically in various experiments. To further investigate Adam's effectiveness, we theoretical derive a partial loss-scale invariance under mild assumptions. Second, the notion of gradient conflicts has often been phrased as a specific problem in MTL. We delve into the role of gradient conflicts in MTL and compare it to STL. For angular gradient alignment we find no evidence that this is a unique problem in MTL. We emphasize differences in gradient magnitude as the main distinguishing factor. Overall, we find surprising similarities between STL and MTL suggesting to consider methods from both fields in a broader context.
Read more8/16/2024
0
FairBranch: Mitigating Bias Transfer in Fair Multi-task Learning
Arjun Roy, Christos Koutlis, Symeon Papadopoulos, Eirini Ntoutsi
The generalisation capacity of Multi-Task Learning (MTL) suffers when unrelated tasks negatively impact each other by updating shared parameters with conflicting gradients. This is known as negative transfer and leads to a drop in MTL accuracy compared to single-task learning (STL). Lately, there has been a growing focus on the fairness of MTL models, requiring the optimization of both accuracy and fairness for individual tasks. Analogously to negative transfer for accuracy, task-specific fairness considerations might adversely affect the fairness of other tasks when there is a conflict of fairness loss gradients between the jointly learned tasks - we refer to this as Bias Transfer. To address both negative- and bias-transfer in MTL, we propose a novel method called FairBranch, which branches the MTL model by assessing the similarity of learned parameters, thereby grouping related tasks to alleviate negative transfer. Moreover, it incorporates fairness loss gradient conflict correction between adjoining task-group branches to address bias transfer within these task groups. Our experiments on tabular and visual MTL problems show that FairBranch outperforms state-of-the-art MTLs on both fairness and accuracy.
Read more9/25/2024
👀
0
When Multi-Task Learning Meets Partial Supervision: A Computer Vision Review
Maxime Fontana, Michael Spratling, Miaojing Shi
Multi-Task Learning (MTL) aims to learn multiple tasks simultaneously while exploiting their mutual relationships. By using shared resources to simultaneously calculate multiple outputs, this learning paradigm has the potential to have lower memory requirements and inference times compared to the traditional approach of using separate methods for each task. Previous work in MTL has mainly focused on fully-supervised methods, as task relationships can not only be leveraged to lower the level of data-dependency of those methods but they can also improve performance. However, MTL introduces a set of challenges due to a complex optimisation scheme and a higher labeling requirement. This review focuses on how MTL could be utilised under different partial supervision settings to address these challenges. First, this review analyses how MTL traditionally uses different parameter sharing techniques to transfer knowledge in between tasks. Second, it presents the different challenges arising from such a multi-objective optimisation scheme. Third, it introduces how task groupings can be achieved by analysing task relationships. Fourth, it focuses on how partially supervised methods applied to MTL can tackle the aforementioned challenges. Lastly, this review presents the available datasets, tools and benchmarking results of such methods.
Read more8/29/2024