Can visual language models resolve textual ambiguity with visual cues? Let visual puns tell you!

Read original: arXiv:2410.01023 - Published 10/3/2024 by Jiwan Chung, Seungwon Lim, Jaehyun Jeon, Seungbeen Lee, Youngjae Yu
Total Score

0

Can visual language models resolve textual ambiguity with visual cues? Let visual puns tell you!

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The provided paper explores whether visual language models can resolve textual ambiguity using visual cues, focusing on visual puns as a test case.
  • The researchers investigate how well these models can interpret and generate visual puns, which rely on the interplay between text and image.
  • The paper presents experiments and findings related to the ability of visual language models to understand and create visual puns.

Plain English Explanation

Visual language models are AI systems that can process and understand both images and text. The researchers in this paper wanted to see if these models could use visual information to help resolve ambiguity in language. They focused on visual puns as a test case, since puns rely on the connection between words and images.

Puns are a type of wordplay where a word or phrase can have multiple meanings, and the juxtaposition of text and image is used to create a humorous or surprising effect. For example, a visual pun could show a picture of a pair of socks with the caption "sole mates," playing on the multiple meanings of the word "sole."

The researchers conducted experiments to see how well visual language models could interpret and generate these types of visual puns. They wanted to understand if the models could use the visual information to resolve the ambiguity in the language and recognize the intended meaning of the pun.

The findings from this research provide insight into the capabilities of these AI systems and how they can leverage multimodal information to improve their understanding of language and communication.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a series of experiments exploring the ability of visual language models to resolve textual ambiguity using visual cues. The researchers focus on visual puns as a test case, as puns rely on the interplay between text and image to create a humorous or surprising effect.

The experiments involve both interpreting existing visual puns and generating new visual puns. The researchers assess the performance of various visual language models on these tasks, comparing their ability to understand the intended meaning of the puns and create their own puns that effectively combine text and image.

The findings provide insights into the multimodal reasoning capabilities of these AI systems and their potential to leverage visual information to resolve textual ambiguity. The results also highlight areas where further research and development may be needed to enhance the reading ability and multimodal understanding of these models.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed set of experiments to assess the capabilities of visual language models in understanding and generating visual puns. The researchers acknowledge the limitations of their work, noting that the dataset of visual puns used in the experiments may not be representative of the full breadth of puns that exist.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential biases or ethical implications of these models' ability to interpret and create visual puns. Further research could explore how these models may perpetuate or reinforce certain cultural or societal biases through their pun generation.

Another area for further exploration is the generalizability of the findings to other types of multimodal content beyond puns. The paper focuses solely on visual puns, and it would be valuable to investigate how these models perform on a wider range of tasks that require integrating textual and visual information.

Conclusion

This paper provides valuable insights into the capabilities of visual language models in resolving textual ambiguity using visual cues. The researchers' focus on visual puns as a test case offers a unique perspective on the multimodal reasoning abilities of these AI systems.

The findings suggest that visual language models can effectively interpret and generate visual puns, demonstrating their potential to leverage multimodal information to improve language understanding. However, the paper also highlights areas for further research and development to fully harness the power of these models in real-world applications.

As visual language models continue to evolve, it will be crucial to explore their broader implications and potential impacts, both positive and negative, on communication, creativity, and society at large.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Can visual language models resolve textual ambiguity with visual cues? Let visual puns tell you!
Total Score

0

New!Can visual language models resolve textual ambiguity with visual cues? Let visual puns tell you!

Jiwan Chung, Seungwon Lim, Jaehyun Jeon, Seungbeen Lee, Youngjae Yu

Humans possess multimodal literacy, allowing them to actively integrate information from various modalities to form reasoning. Faced with challenges like lexical ambiguity in text, we supplement this with other modalities, such as thumbnail images or textbook illustrations. Is it possible for machines to achieve a similar multimodal understanding capability? In response, we present Understanding Pun with Image Explanations (UNPIE), a novel benchmark designed to assess the impact of multimodal inputs in resolving lexical ambiguities. Puns serve as the ideal subject for this evaluation due to their intrinsic ambiguity. Our dataset includes 1,000 puns, each accompanied by an image that explains both meanings. We pose three multimodal challenges with the annotations to assess different aspects of multimodal literacy; Pun Grounding, Disambiguation, and Reconstruction. The results indicate that various Socratic Models and Visual-Language Models improve over the text-only models when given visual context, particularly as the complexity of the tasks increases.

Read more

10/3/2024

💬

Total Score

0

A good pun is its own reword: Can Large Language Models Understand Puns?

Zhijun Xu, Siyu Yuan, Lingjie Chen, Deqing Yang

Puns play a vital role in academic research due to their distinct structure and clear definition, which aid in the comprehensive analysis of linguistic humor. However, the understanding of puns in large language models (LLMs) has not been thoroughly examined, limiting their use in creative writing and humor creation. In this paper, we leverage three popular tasks, i.e., pun recognition, explanation and generation to systematically evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in pun understanding. In addition to adopting the automated evaluation metrics from prior research, we introduce new evaluation methods and metrics that are better suited to the in-context learning paradigm of LLMs. These new metrics offer a more rigorous assessment of an LLM's ability to understand puns and align more closely with human cognition than previous metrics. Our findings reveal the lazy pun generation pattern and identify the primary challenges LLMs encounter in understanding puns.

Read more

6/18/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

New!Why context matters in VQA and Reasoning: Semantic interventions for VLM input modalities

Kenza Amara, Lukas Klein, Carsten Luth, Paul Jager, Hendrik Strobelt, Mennatallah El-Assady

The various limitations of Generative AI, such as hallucinations and model failures, have made it crucial to understand the role of different modalities in Visual Language Model (VLM) predictions. Our work investigates how the integration of information from image and text modalities influences the performance and behavior of VLMs in visual question answering (VQA) and reasoning tasks. We measure this effect through answer accuracy, reasoning quality, model uncertainty, and modality relevance. We study the interplay between text and image modalities in different configurations where visual content is essential for solving the VQA task. Our contributions include (1) the Semantic Interventions (SI)-VQA dataset, (2) a benchmark study of various VLM architectures under different modality configurations, and (3) the Interactive Semantic Interventions (ISI) tool. The SI-VQA dataset serves as the foundation for the benchmark, while the ISI tool provides an interface to test and apply semantic interventions in image and text inputs, enabling more fine-grained analysis. Our results show that complementary information between modalities improves answer and reasoning quality, while contradictory information harms model performance and confidence. Image text annotations have minimal impact on accuracy and uncertainty, slightly increasing image relevance. Attention analysis confirms the dominant role of image inputs over text in VQA tasks. In this study, we evaluate state-of-the-art VLMs that allow us to extract attention coefficients for each modality. A key finding is PaliGemma's harmful overconfidence, which poses a higher risk of silent failures compared to the LLaVA models. This work sets the foundation for rigorous analysis of modality integration, supported by datasets specifically designed for this purpose.

Read more

10/3/2024

Creating a Lens of Chinese Culture: A Multimodal Dataset for Chinese Pun Rebus Art Understanding
Total Score

0

Creating a Lens of Chinese Culture: A Multimodal Dataset for Chinese Pun Rebus Art Understanding

Tuo Zhang, Tiantian Feng, Yibin Ni, Mengqin Cao, Ruying Liu, Katharine Butler, Yanjun Weng, Mi Zhang, Shrikanth S. Narayanan, Salman Avestimehr

Large vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable abilities in understanding everyday content. However, their performance in the domain of art, particularly culturally rich art forms, remains less explored. As a pearl of human wisdom and creativity, art encapsulates complex cultural narratives and symbolism. In this paper, we offer the Pun Rebus Art Dataset, a multimodal dataset for art understanding deeply rooted in traditional Chinese culture. We focus on three primary tasks: identifying salient visual elements, matching elements with their symbolic meanings, and explanations for the conveyed messages. Our evaluation reveals that state-of-the-art VLMs struggle with these tasks, often providing biased and hallucinated explanations and showing limited improvement through in-context learning. By releasing the Pun Rebus Art Dataset, we aim to facilitate the development of VLMs that can better understand and interpret culturally specific content, promoting greater inclusiveness beyond English-based corpora.

Read more

6/18/2024